First of all, I must apologise for asking you to give your
particular 820 a second chance. Though I don't think I influence
your decision much in the end, I think it's just sad things turn
out this way...
s800 which I saw was fantastic. But I forget to mention that we
have in our team a color management expert that got all printers to
print alright with spot-on color, much like Andrew Rodney is doing
for a fee...
We printed cupious amounts of photos from s800 and we liked it for
its speed (already then 800 was 'fast' by HP standard). Epson 2000P
was a nightmare, for the color management guy practically had to
tweak quite a lot for
every different print files and again with
different paper types. Imagine we test printed so much then, I
think he lost some white blood cells (not from the inks, but from
frustrations spending time
alone in the lab tweaking the outputs
while we were out for lunch...).
Sorry I digressed. What I was saying was that Canon s800 worked
like a charm. And I have to qualify: it worked (past tense) like a
charm. I would have thought s820 is an improvement from s800...
You too huh? How much is a new printhead? I'm now wonderig just how
economical in the long haul these Canons really are when compared
to the new HP's. Don't you get virtually a new print head with
every HP cartridge? And how come Canon still uses a manual print
head alignment proceedure while HP's is automatic? (using that blue
light) Also Hp has automatic paper detection. So which one is
really more technologically advanced? Because I guess if I take it
back to the store I could then just as easily pick up a 7150.
Wonder if the new S830 would still have printhead problems?
Probably. Well if Canon isn't making money off of ink carts like HP
does it sure is recovering nicely from repalcement print heads.
Kinda balances out. And oh, by the way, that was the 2nd time I had
to replace the black cart in 2 weeks. And yes I have been doing a
lot of photo work.
Yes, in this respect, I think the cheap 7150 would probably be a
good replacement. Bear in mind that while I tested with the draft
driver last year, 7150 has slightly poorer shadow details compared
with the s800. That said, it seemed to one poster (chingon, I
think) that the shadow details of the production model 7350 is
still not as good as the s9000. Maybe Canon improved print wuality
still further between s800 and s9000 or HP did not nail the shadow
detail business (not a huge problem, so I don't think it's in their
priority) on time as they introduced the 7000 series to the market.
How much was your s820? HP 7150 sells at $189 street, I guess.
--
Fotografer