Evaluating possible D7000 Upgrade to My Photo Rig

Please forgive me for abusing a dead equine, but just to be sure.... You folks agree that I will get much sharper images and better color - even with my crappy existing lenses? How about whiter whites?
I have a D70, shoot in RAW, and never have problems with color or whites. Do you shoot in JPG? If you switch to RAW you will have more control over your colors and you will get sharper images without spending a dime.
I do want to get better lenses, but that will have to wait. For only having two lenses, they have served me pretty well all these years.
You could buy some relatively cheap primes, like the 50 or 35 1.8's to improve your image quality. You would get much more out of your new D7000 if you upgrade your lenses, seriously. If resolution if what you're after, then you'll have that in spades with a D7000, but you will still be getting soft images with those lenses. Will they be too soft for your tastes and needs? I have no idea.

Let me add some other things to consider- the D7000 has oodles of more features than the D70, which I personally think is a more compelling reason to upgrade than the pure megapixels increase. Ever fancy shooting macro? It has MLU (not on D70). Want to use old MF lenses? It will meter with them. It has a larger screen with live view, which may be quite useful in certain situations. It's more weather sealed than the D70. Not to mention improved AF and viewfinder. All of these will really help you get your shot, and will improve your photography beyond the resolution aspect.
 
My first Nikon DSLR was a D70. I has a two Canons, the D30 and the D60, the Nikon blew both of the Canons out of the water. For me the D70 was a watershed product for Nikon, period.

I progressed through each subsequent change, D200, D300, D700 and today I shoot a D7000 waiting for the D700 replacement.

Frankly, the D700 was and is the finest camera I ever owned. The D7000 is a D700 lite. If the ISO performance was similar to the D700, I would not even think of changing. I would sell my FX glass in a heartbeat.

I love the ergonomics, the output, the feature set etc. It is pure Nikon.

The only thing I really wish the D7000 had was a tilting LCD like the D5100 or NEX7, I would also love not having to use an external GPS. Except for the LCD issue, the D7000 IMHO is a superb camera. I would wait for it's replacement but that's because I love taking pictures and I am a bit of a gearhead.
--
Regards,

Jeff Morris / Homecinemaman

Adams, Gutmann, Steichen, Snoopy, Stigletz, Weston. they lead by example.

I hunt, I peck, I squint, all on a Dell M1330 13" laptop. So don't laugh, I'm happy there aren't more typo's!
 
Hey Steve,

You've gotten some decent advice throughout the thread...lots of good reading.

I'll address your main question at the end but will interject the odd comment on the way down.
I’m seeking guidance on upgrading my rig. I want to upgrade for the following reasons:

(1) I am dissatisfied with the lack of sharpness and detail – especially when I crop.
Given you current lenses (especially the sub-par 70-300) much of your sharpness issues may be attributed to the lens or lenses you own. When I put my 70-200 2.8 on my D70s I can get some pretty impressive results (the 70-200 is my best lens).
(2) I was shocked at the superior colors I got with a borrowed D3100.
For a couple of generations the entry level Nikons have been known for the terrific colors. This holds true with the D50, D40, D60 and D3100. They have been set up at the factory to produce nice saturated images right out of the box. Other cameras, such as the D70 or D300 are a little more muted and generally need some tweeking to produce the same kind of colors.
(3) I’m suffering from long-denied GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome).
You've had that D70s for a long enough time .... you deserve something new.
(4) Faster, better operations would sure be welcome.
Ergonomically, not much has changed between generations of these Nikons, just a few refinements here and there.
My current rig (bought in the mid-1800’s) is as follows:
(1) Nikon D70S
(2) Nikkor AF f/3.5-4.5 G 18-70mm (27-105mm equiv.)
(3) Nikkor AF f/4.0-5.6 G 70-300mm (105 – 450mm equiv.)
The 70-300 is the weakest link in your chain.
(4) Nikon Speedlight SB-800’s (two) plus stands and umbrellas
Awsome! Love the SB800...make sure you get a CLS compatible camera.
What I shoot:
(1) Portraits (adults and children)

(2) Nature (some landscapes, but mostly animals at a distance, plus flowers, etc.)
(3) General, family get-togethers, weddings, baptisms, etc.
(4) I almost always shoot RAW

How I process my results:
(1) I mostly use Lightroom, but sometimes I resort to Photoshop.
(2) 75% of my shots are sent out in digital format.
(3) 20% are sent to a photo processor.
(4) 5% are printed on my Epson Stylus Photo 1400.

What I am considering:
(1) Nikon D7000 (now)
(2) Other lenses in the distant future.

Rationale:

(1) Almost triple pixels (6 vs 16.2 mp) on the sensor should yield sharper crops
True, but the question is ...why are you cropping so much? Is it because your 18-70 doesn't zoom in enough for your shooting style? Is it because your 70-300 does a poor job near 300mm. Maybe there are ways to not crop so much...to use all of your sensor.
(2) Tremendous improvements in technology should result in better color, etc.
Not really, you will get some extra dynamic range (more detail in shadows with a given white point) and some improvements in high ISO noise (and of course some ISO settings that just aren't there on the old D70).
(3) Several generations improvement in technology in general (ease of use, etc.)
Again, not really, a Nikon is a Nikon is Nikon. The D70 is just as easy to use as the newer cameras.
(4) I really want to keep the Nikon CLS and Flash Command support.

Concerns:

(1) All the hoopla about defective D7000’s – although it appears that some of this has come from mob-hysteria, and more, from people who weren’t prepared for such a sophisticated camera, and the need to RTFM – so much smoke makes me worry about the possibility of some real fires. However, virtually every expert has praised the camera, and not one encountered any of the supposed issues. NOTE: I am not trying to “stir the pot” on this issue.

(2) Perhaps I should wait 6 – 24 months to ensure that something amazing doesn’t come out at about the same price point as the D7000.

If you are still with me, please forgive the lengthy posting – but I have seen many responses to similar questions which complained about insufficient information. Any suggestions would be most welcome. I think I am at that phase of analysis where one just goes around in circles, chasing one’s own tail!
You've had your camera long enough, an upgrade is certainly deserved. But I've also read that your budget doesn't allow you to upgrade both your lenses and to get a D7000. While the D7000 might be the best camera you can get in DX, the question remains....do you need the best? The answer is probably no. I think if I were you I'd be looking to pick up a D90 at a good price and use the savings to upgrade your lenses. The 18-70 is generally considered a decent lens so I'd keep that as a walk around zoom unless I found a great deal on D90+18-105 kit. Then look to shore up on the lens front. Depending on how you shoot maybe the new 85-1.8 is the way to go. Shallow depth of field often makes for a nice portrait. Or maybe the newer AFS 70-300 if you want the same focal length as you have now in a better lens (maybe Tamron). Heck, you can sometimes find a used copy of the terrific 80-200 2.8 push pull for around $400.

The old adage of lenses before camera comes into play here. However, no one can deny you that new camera smell....you've put in the years with the D70. I think a nice compromise might be something like a D90 and some new glass.

--
eddyshoots
 
EddyShoots - thank you so much for addressing this issue - you confirmed what I have long suspected. My initial "limit" is the 6mp sensor on the D70S. If I upgrade to the D7000 I will then be able to detect the next "limit" which will be my existing lenses weaknesses, e.g.: distortion, softness, etc. If I upgrade my lenses, I will then be able to detect the "limits" of the D7000, e.g.: not full frame, only 16mp, etc.

However, each step will still be an improvement, limited only by the next weakest link in the chain.

If I am not mistaken, by getting the D7K, I will net a small, but meaningful improvement in IQ now, AND be able to reap the advantages of improved lenses as I can purchase them in the future.
 
I am truly humbled by the generosity of the people who so kindly gave their advice. I have gone back and read and re-read each posting several times. There is truly a treasure trove of information and insights here, and I am very grateful. Thank you all, very much. I intend to look at my options in light of your advice, and hopefully, I will make a decision within the next 30 days or so.

Steve
 
EddyShoots - thank you so much for addressing this issue - you confirmed what I have long suspected. My initial "limit" is the 6mp sensor on the D70S. If I upgrade to the D7000 I will then be able to detect the next "limit" which will be my existing lenses weaknesses, e.g.: distortion, softness, etc. If I upgrade my lenses, I will then be able to detect the "limits" of the D7000, e.g.: not full frame, only 16mp, etc.

However, each step will still be an improvement, limited only by the next weakest link in the chain.
Yes, but there is also a practical limit about how far one needs to go. Facebook, flickr or email images only need to be a couple of mp...every extra mp is completely wasted. Unless you print HUGE, you will be wasting many of the mp of the newest cameras...I've made 12x18 inch prints from a D40 (6mp) and there is no noticeable pixelization. How much larger than 12x18 do any of us really go?
If I am not mistaken, by getting the D7K, I will net a small, but meaningful improvement in IQ now, AND be able to reap the advantages of improved lenses as I can purchase them in the future.
I believe that you might with the 18-70 but I doubt it with the 70-300. I had one for short time that I got as a package deal with a film camera. I found that the weakness of that lens was apparent even with a 6mp camera. In other words I found that lens to be weaker even than a 6mp camera...you may not see any improvement moving up to a D7000 and using that lens.

I posted below a longer response but will summarize here. I don't think it's worth while to blow your entire budget on the latest and greatest camera with the lenses you have now. Yes you can use an upgrade in camera but there really needs to be some room in the budget for better glass.

Feel free to IM me should you want to get into more specifics.

--
eddyshoots
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top