Oregon Dawg
Senior Member
The rabbit hole is not necessarily a bad thing, lol. I've enjoyed my time there. It can be fun learning and exploring. At some point something usually happens that brings us back up to the surface.You're absolutely right—I’ve gone deep down the rabbit hole over the years. My photography needs have evolved, and I’ve reached a point where I fully understand the trade-offs. Now, I focus on buying what truly matters rather than endlessly poring over reviews to find the absolute best optical performers.
I used to chase upgrades in image quality and specs, but I’ve realized that for my travel needs, compactness and good image quality matter more than anything else.
A few years ago, I would have been all about prime lenses. Today, I’d happily choose a compact f/2.8 or f/4 zoom over a prime with better image quality.
Most of my travel involves flights, and my camera bag is my personal item. It has to hold my laptop, travel documents, DJI Pocket 3, camera gear, and other electronics. That’s why compactness is critical—it’s not just about weight but also size, since the bag needs to fit under the seat.
With my Nikon setup, I’ve maxed out the available space, so adding more lenses isn’t an option. With Fuji, I’d have the advantage of significantly reducing weight while still being able to carry a few extra lenses without worrying about space.
My trips are primarily for sightseeing rather than dedicated photography, so I need a setup I can take everywhere without feeling weighed down.
That being said, I love getting a lot of detail in the images. Since I watch all my videos and photos on both my 70inch TV, but also in a VR headset with a virtual 100 inch screen. love seeing the detail in objects and places and photography for me is a very personal hobby. Outside of friends and family, I don't post my images anywhere and just enjoy revisiting my memories and love going back in time with my photos and videos.
Some Updates:
I just returned from a weekend getaway, and the Z8 delivered incredible results. I shot everything—buildings, oceans, birds, people, and landscapes—and aside from one or two images, autofocus was spot-on. I also shot a lot of birds in flight for video, and the autofocus performed exceptionally well. The DX mode and additional cropping helped me capture smaller birds.
That said, I did run into some limitations with focal range for certain birds, but that’s a trade-off I’ll have to accept since I’m not planning on buying larger lenses.
For the first time, I’m in complete awe of the camera and its capabilities—there’s nothing I dislike about it, except for the size and weight of the setup. It's built like a tank, handles everything and gives me immense room to grow my skill.
I did feel a bit self-conscious shooting street photography with the Z8 and the 28-75mm f/2.8 G2. The setup felt bulky, and I didn’t want to make people uncomfortable with such a large camera and lens.
Last evening, I visited my local store and got a hands-on demo of the silver X-T5 with the 16-50mm f/2.8-4 and the 70-300mm. The weight difference compared to my Nikon setup was substantial. While the Nikon has a better grip, the Fuji wasn’t bad, and I was told I could add a SmallRig grip to improve handling.
The dials felt tactile and satisfying, the compactness was great, and I liked the easy switch between video and photo modes. Just handling it felt fun!
The X-T5 is truly compact and next to the Z8, it felt tiny. With the 70-300 on the X-T5 and the 28-400 on the Z8, there was a big difference in weight and size. The fuji setup will be a lot easier to travel with.
Unfortunately, due to store policy, they couldn’t install a battery in the unit since I was testing a brand-new boxed item. So, I couldn’t evaluate autofocus or image quality, but the handling and lens size were a significant improvement over the Z8.
But I am worried about the build quality ( I was told the silver color was prone to the paint peeling off), and the auto focus drop coming from Z8. I also don't know how the X-T5 will handle rolling shutter.
In the past this would have been an easy choice. I would have made the switch and figured it out. If I didn't pan out, I would reassess and try something else. This time, I have something I truly like, so I want to be very careful and cover all my bases before doing anything.
Travel: I've traveled with my heavy bag with a Nikon DSLR and 3 lenses. And I was carrying primes, and it was still heavy. I've carried a bag with a Fuji X-T4, 16-80, 33 1.4 and 70-300. And it wasn't much different than my Nikon bag. Now I have the X-T5, 35 f2 and 16-50. My bag weighs 5 pounds. And it feels like a maximum for me, lol. (And it's worth noting that other than the telephoto I've been happy with all three kits as far as photo quality and gear usage is concerned). I probably won't travel with the 5 pound bag unless we go somewhere special where I can do some deliberate photography. Otherwise I'll travel with my iPhone. Anyway, it could be you consider two systems, the Z8 for deliberate photography and something more compact for travel photography. Although, having two systems does add cost. I've never had two systems myself, although I suppose these days my iPhone is my second system. There are plenty of people on this forum that have multiple cameras for different use cases.
Good luck with everything! You have a lot of knowledge and experience, you will figure out what works best for you.