* Customizing an F828 Set-up *

Great post back Anthony......Do you have any photos from the ariel
rig you've fashioned for the F828? I'm looking forward to my
preorder Epson 4000 due in March: its good to hear your getting
great blow ups on the Epson 7600.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
I'm not yet a member of SMUG or P-Base yet but when I return from a trip to UK I'll post some details - and hopefully some great shots of castles and abbeys ... great photo opportunities.

Thanks for your interest.

By the way the Epson 4000 will be a great machine - if you can put up with a lot of extraneous chatter you could join the Yahoo Epson wide-format group ... lots of information there.

Tony
--
828707 from down under
 
Great post back Anthony......Do you have any photos from the ariel
rig you've fashioned for the F828? I'm looking forward to my
preorder Epson 4000 due in March: its good to hear your getting
great blow ups on the Epson 7600.

Regards,
Norman
Tony.....Will look forward to see your shots from the UK when you have a site, also would be interested in seeing a photo of your ariel set up, and the casing you've fabricated for the F828, which you could add to this thread at any time, finding it through the search engine.

Here is a shot flying low in a single engine plane over coastal Mts North of Vancouver. I am assembling over time a portfolio of photos for an eventual CD-Rom from travels in the wild coastal Princess Louisa Falls area, from land, boat and air.


I'm not yet a member of SMUG or P-Base yet but when I return from a
trip to UK I'll post some details - and hopefully some great shots
of castles and abbeys ... great photo opportunities.

Thanks for your interest.

By the way the Epson 4000 will be a great machine - if you can put
up with a lot of extraneous chatter you could join the Yahoo Epson
wide-format group ... lots of information there.
Thanks for the reference of the Yahoo Epson wide-format group. Do you have a link for it? I am looking forward with great anticipation to the arrival of the Epson 4000- 17"x 44" sz. potential with archival inks re fine art prints- exciting stuff. It has taken a leap of faith for me ro pre-order and move to a machine of this cost & size capability in conjuction with the F828.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
Tony
--
828707 from down under
 
I've had one on order since Dec. 31st. I don't think anybody has them in stock. Are they still being manufactured?
Al
(Link below)

http://www.ibuyernet.com/prod~id~153374~SONY_RMDR1.htm

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.

The F828 I find relatively light, compact, fluid and flexible in
its handling. These features are carried through in my choice of
tripod, and ball head. The tripod: Manfrotto Carbon fibre 443
(carbon One) -center post removed. The Kirk BH-3 ball head, I find
to be a gem, with its large single knob for fast aim and frame,with
two smaller pan and ball friction knobs.

The quick release plate remains mounted on the base of the F828,
allowing for rapid transition from tripod to hand held shots. I
prefer to shoot from the tripod, including shots where movement is
involved, such as wildlife. (AF mode may be preset to continuous in
wildlife circumstances, and monitor otherwise). I set the ball
friction knob to where the ball head allows me to both frame
quickly, and holds position with further lock down, (if need be.)

I am drawn to use the “real” setting exclusively, and ISO 64 as a
default setting, with contrast set at minus one, to hold and
retain subtle tonal gradation. I use the fine setting and a 1 Gig
card, which allows for 262 approx.shots at 8 M pixels,(128 back-up
in the camera). Circumstances permitting I prefer to shot in full
manual mode. My ongoing approach is to explore a theme or
subject(s) in series, while moving and varying camera positions,
and focal lengths.

I have attached to the camera strap loop a 1” diam. key ring for my
index finger, as a means of further securing the camera off the
tripod,in place of a strap. - a personal choice. Finding the
combination of variables, that make balance in set -up is IMO
highly individual. The accompanying lens hood remains on, unless an
add on lens such as the MCON-35 is used.

The live histogram is refered to often, edging highlights up to,
and not beyond the right side. In critical or high contrast
situations I bracket exposure, and/or make two shots in the same
position off the tripod. For example, one exposing for the brighter
sky or highlights, and the other for ground areas, or shadows,
which may then later be selectively recombined, and merged in post
processing.

I am of the view that there is no one best camera, and no one
camera fits all. As orientations vary, there is no need to think of
one set up that is necessarily better than another. It is IMO less
about whats "best" and much more about what is suitable. I tend to
think of a digital camera in a larger context, or a link in a
chain in a creative image package.

The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.

Other related and customizable facets of a camera may be thought
of as extending to include editing software, and post processing
(which I enjoy), where viewed on a graphics quality monitor. With
the arrival of the F828, and my overall satisfaction with it, I
have pre-ordered an Epson 4000 printer, for the marketing of
archival fine art prints.

A Lowepro "side line shooter "camera bag works for me for all round
purposes in the bush, and urban areas, while the waterproof
Pelican 1400 hard case protects the camera around coastal
environments.

It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman

--
NRich
http://www.pbase.com/norman
 
A16444,

I'm sorry to hear that. One alternative is if the remotes are out of stock in the U.S. is to buy the RM-DR1 from a Canadian source such as Sony.ca.....Canadian cost $ 79.99 which through exchange rate translates to approximately $ 61 U.S. Dollars, plus shipping.

http://www.sonystyle.ca/commerce/servlet/PerformSearch?searchType=productSearch&keyword=RM-DR1

I am a strong proponent of a remote release. The F828 has no mirror to add movement. One can choose not to introduce movement by finger pressing a shutter, or even touching the camera, and instead trigger without movement with an electronic remote release. When mounted on a worthy tripod this method, along with correct settings will hold all the resolving detail the 8M pixel F828 is capable of.

Let me know if you don't get satisfaction fron Sony.ca ....I'll make a few phone calls locally here in Western Canada and see if one of the eight Greater Vancouver Sony retail outlets has it in stock.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
(Link below)

http://www.ibuyernet.com/prod~id~153374~SONY_RMDR1.htm

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.
The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
 
I really need this item. but I cant find it, I guess because I dont really know what it's called, in swedish that is.

any tips where one could buy such a level, in europe?


I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.

The F828 I find relatively light, compact, fluid and flexible in
its handling. These features are carried through in my choice of
tripod, and ball head. The tripod: Manfrotto Carbon fibre 443
(carbon One) -center post removed. The Kirk BH-3 ball head, I find
to be a gem, with its large single knob for fast aim and frame,with
two smaller pan and ball friction knobs.

The quick release plate remains mounted on the base of the F828,
allowing for rapid transition from tripod to hand held shots. I
prefer to shoot from the tripod, including shots where movement is
involved, such as wildlife. (AF mode may be preset to continuous in
wildlife circumstances, and monitor otherwise). I set the ball
friction knob to where the ball head allows me to both frame
quickly, and holds position with further lock down, (if need be.)

I am drawn to use the “real” setting exclusively, and ISO 64 as a
default setting, with contrast set at minus one, to hold and
retain subtle tonal gradation. I use the fine setting and a 1 Gig
card, which allows for 262 approx.shots at 8 M pixels,(128 back-up
in the camera). Circumstances permitting I prefer to shot in full
manual mode. My ongoing approach is to explore a theme or
subject(s) in series, while moving and varying camera positions,
and focal lengths.

I have attached to the camera strap loop a 1” diam. key ring for my
index finger, as a means of further securing the camera off the
tripod,in place of a strap. - a personal choice. Finding the
combination of variables, that make balance in set -up is IMO
highly individual. The accompanying lens hood remains on, unless an
add on lens such as the MCON-35 is used.

The live histogram is refered to often, edging highlights up to,
and not beyond the right side. In critical or high contrast
situations I bracket exposure, and/or make two shots in the same
position off the tripod. For example, one exposing for the brighter
sky or highlights, and the other for ground areas, or shadows,
which may then later be selectively recombined, and merged in post
processing.

I am of the view that there is no one best camera, and no one
camera fits all. As orientations vary, there is no need to think of
one set up that is necessarily better than another. It is IMO less
about whats "best" and much more about what is suitable. I tend to
think of a digital camera in a larger context, or a link in a
chain in a creative image package.

The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.

Other related and customizable facets of a camera may be thought
of as extending to include editing software, and post processing
(which I enjoy), where viewed on a graphics quality monitor. With
the arrival of the F828, and my overall satisfaction with it, I
have pre-ordered an Epson 4000 printer, for the marketing of
archival fine art prints.

A Lowepro "side line shooter "camera bag works for me for all round
purposes in the bush, and urban areas, while the waterproof
Pelican 1400 hard case protects the camera around coastal
environments.

It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman

--
NRich
http://www.pbase.com/norman
 
Hej,

I can't talk to you in your own language, but try this link:

http://www.hama.de
and then go to > Produkte > Suche > "Wasserwaage"

You'll find two versions - a simple and a double one. I'm sure any of the better equipped photo shops in Sweden should either stock it or be able to order it quickly from your country's HAMA importer.

Regards,

Johannes
I really need this item. but I cant find it, I guess because I dont
really know what it's called, in swedish that is.

any tips where one could buy such a level, in europe?
 
Appreciate the responses.
Steve
Thanks for the post, always interesting to hear how others are
using their kit. Checked out your galleries, "Sailing North:
Inspirations" is an exceptional collection of individual images in
their own right - but as a collection from a single trip is
outstanding.
I'm fairly new to digital photography and to the STF (got an 828
just over three weeks ago), but was heavily into 35mm a few years
ago.
Hi Steve.....Coming into digital from 35mm via an F828 has got to
be a great adventure.
I am finding that as I get used to the 828 my way of working is
evolving (practice and taking advice from STF). Started off in P
auto, then to aperture priority (which I used to use most when I
had my Contax gear). I am now moving more to Manual and using the
histogram to judge exposure. In good light there are no problems
at all, but in dull light I am tending to underexpose one or two
stops then lift the image in PSP in post processing.
I find ones relation to tripod or momopod , in a variety of
situations, effects exposure choices, and whether one is drawn to
use the tripod or hand hold in low light. A quick release I find
indispensible. Are you currently using one? I think we have
psychological preferences in regards to shooting on or off a
tripod. Low light may stretch ones resolve:-)

Sometimes a mono pod will act to encourage routine use of
additional support in low light, and some may serve as a good
walking stick:-) Manfrotto makes a monopod that has a small
internal tripod inside a monopod at the base that retracts, and is
useful for photographing in low light in locations such as museums,
that prohibit tripods, and may overlook monopods.
As far as focussing goes, I am using the movable spot focussing
control if the situation allows, more and more - think this is a
great feature.
In terms of handling I think the 828 is superb, and I am tending to
use the external screen a lot more than I would have thought as
this is letting me easily capture unusual angles.

I am hand holding down to about 125, but finding it easy to rest
the camera on various surfaces and using the rear screen and this
lets me get acceptable images down to about 1/30.

Kit wise, in addition to the 828 I have invested in a manfrotto
714shb tripod. This folds down to about a foot long, is
lightweight and sturdy enough for most conditions I have
encountered. This also fits with my goal of not carting a ton of
kit around anymore. I have also bought a tamrac velocity 5 bag
onto which I strap the tripod. This has space for the 828,
flashgun power leads, filters and lens cloth. Filter wise I have a
UV and circular polarizing. I only have a single 128Mb stick at
the moment and this is proving the most irritating as I am filling
it all too quickly.

On my shopping list, once my credit card has recovered from the 828
is a decent flashgun (undecided yet), IR and ND filters and further
memory sticks.
I have bit the bullet on a one Gig flash card. takes 262 shots -8M
in fine mode. when I download, the card needn't be lost or damaged,
as it doesn't leave the camera.
At the moment I am shooting mostly local architecture, portraits of
friends and family, as well as trying to enter each of the STF
challenges (may even make a placing one day).

I am very much enjoying learning to get the best out of my 828 and
I am amazed at the amount of control and enjoyment that can be had
in post-processing.
I agree, post processing I also find enjoyable, giving me an
opportunity to revisit the shots, and refine an image. Thank you
for posting.

Thank you for your thoughful post.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
Thanks to yourself and other STF'ers for sharing their experience.

Steve

--
http://www.pbase.com/stevecheetham
--
http://www.pbase.com/stevecheetham
 
Hello Yaz.....a little background on camera levels. There is several types available :one the axial level,(much like a carpenders level), and the bullseye level. which is circular. I am using the German Kaiser bullseye level. The principle differences between the two is that while the axial level tends to be a little more accurate, the bullseye level is generally compact, (1/2" dia.), and faster to use.

I am giving you a link to a one source of the kaiser level that you see pictured in my set up photo. It is designed to fit in the hot shoe. One of the reasons I like this level is that it is made up of two bulleye levels, one for horizontal (scenes and landscapes), and the second level for pointing the camera straight down, useful for copy work....link below.

http://www.kbcamera.com/supportsales.htm

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
any tips where one could buy such a level, in europe?
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium .

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.
.
The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.
...Those reading please feel free to share your set -up, by return post.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
 


I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.

The F828 I find relatively light, compact, fluid and flexible in
its handling. These features are carried through in my choice of
tripod, and ball head. The tripod: Manfrotto Carbon fibre 443
(carbon One) -center post removed. The Kirk BH-3 ball head, I find
to be a gem, with its large single knob for fast aim and frame,with
two smaller pan and ball friction knobs.

The quick release plate remains mounted on the base of the F828,
allowing for rapid transition from tripod to hand held shots. I
prefer to shoot from the tripod, including shots where movement is
involved, such as wildlife. (AF mode may be preset to continuous in
wildlife circumstances, and monitor otherwise). I set the ball
friction knob to where the ball head allows me to both frame
quickly, and holds position with further lock down, (if need be.)

I am drawn to use the “real” setting exclusively, and ISO 64 as a
default setting, with contrast set at minus one, to hold and
retain subtle tonal gradation. I use the fine setting and a 1 Gig
card, which allows for 262 approx.shots at 8 M pixels,(128 back-up
in the camera). Circumstances permitting I prefer to shot in full
manual mode. My ongoing approach is to explore a theme or
subject(s) in series, while moving and varying camera positions,
and focal lengths.

I have attached to the camera strap loop a 1” diam. key ring for my
index finger, as a means of further securing the camera off the
tripod,in place of a strap. - a personal choice. Finding the
combination of variables, that make balance in set -up is IMO
highly individual. The accompanying lens hood remains on, unless an
add on lens such as the MCON-35 is used.

The live histogram is refered to often, edging highlights up to,
and not beyond the right side. In critical or high contrast
situations I bracket exposure, and/or make two shots in the same
position off the tripod. For example, one exposing for the brighter
sky or highlights, and the other for ground areas, or shadows,
which may then later be selectively recombined, and merged in post
processing.

I am of the view that there is no one best camera, and no one
camera fits all. As orientations vary, there is no need to think of
one set up that is necessarily better than another. It is IMO less
about whats "best" and much more about what is suitable. I tend to
think of a digital camera in a larger context, or a link in a
chain in a creative image package.

The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.

Other related and customizable facets of a camera may be thought
of as extending to include editing software, and post processing
(which I enjoy), where viewed on a graphics quality monitor. With
the arrival of the F828, and my overall satisfaction with it, I
have pre-ordered an Epson 4000 printer, for the marketing of
archival fine art prints.

A Lowepro "side line shooter "camera bag works for me for all round
purposes in the bush, and urban areas, while the waterproof
Pelican 1400 hard case protects the camera around coastal
environments.

It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman

--
NRich
http://www.pbase.com/norman
 
I can't talk to you in your own language, but try this link:

http://www.hama.de
and then go to > Produkte > Suche > "Wasserwaage"

You'll find two versions - a simple and a double one. I'm sure any
of the better equipped photo shops in Sweden should either stock it
or be able to order it quickly from your country's HAMA importer.

Regards,

Johannes
I really need this item. but I cant find it, I guess because I dont
really know what it's called, in swedish that is.

any tips where one could buy such a level, in europe?
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
 
Hi Ed,

... just a short thank you to let you know, I appreciated hearing back that a thread info has value for others. I would invite any now reading to add to this thread by sharing your current camera set up: what works for you, and why.

Regards,
Norman

NRich
http://www.pbase.com/norman
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium .

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
 
I think that if you check out the Sony Style site for this remote, the RN-VD1, you will find that the compatibility list includes the F-828. I guess I would deduce that this is now functioning for video and still camera use. Also B&H is also listing this remote and suggesting it for the F-828 as well. I couldn't find the RM-DR1 in stock anywhere, I assume this is why.
............t...............
I'm sorry to hear that. One alternative is if the remotes are out
of stock in the U.S. is to buy the RM-DR1 from a Canadian source
such as Sony.ca.....Canadian cost $ 79.99 which through exchange
rate translates to approximately $ 61 U.S. Dollars, plus shipping.

http://www.sonystyle.ca/commerce/servlet/PerformSearch?searchType=productSearch&keyword=RM-DR1

I am a strong proponent of a remote release. The F828 has no mirror
to add movement. One can choose not to introduce movement by finger
pressing a shutter, or even touching the camera, and instead
trigger without movement with an electronic remote release. When
mounted on a worthy tripod this method, along with correct settings
will hold all the resolving detail the 8M pixel F828 is capable of.

Let me know if you don't get satisfaction fron Sony.ca ....I'll
make a few phone calls locally here in Western Canada and see if
one of the eight Greater Vancouver Sony retail outlets has it in
stock.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
(Link below)

http://www.ibuyernet.com/prod~id~153374~SONY_RMDR1.htm

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.
The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
 
I think that if you check out the Sony Style site for this remote,
the RN-VD1, you will find that the compatibility list includes the
F-828. I guess I would deduce that this is now functioning for
video and still camera use. Also B&H is also listing this remote
and suggesting it for the F-828 as well. I couldn't find the RM-DR1
in stock anywhere, I assume this is why.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
 
Seems the RM-VD1 is out of stock also. Tried B&H and Amazon.
Thanks
Al
I'm sorry to hear that. One alternative is if the remotes are out
of stock in the U.S. is to buy the RM-DR1 from a Canadian source
such as Sony.ca.....Canadian cost $ 79.99 which through exchange
rate translates to approximately $ 61 U.S. Dollars, plus shipping.

http://www.sonystyle.ca/commerce/servlet/PerformSearch?searchType=productSearch&keyword=RM-DR1

I am a strong proponent of a remote release. The F828 has no mirror
to add movement. One can choose not to introduce movement by finger
pressing a shutter, or even touching the camera, and instead
trigger without movement with an electronic remote release. When
mounted on a worthy tripod this method, along with correct settings
will hold all the resolving detail the 8M pixel F828 is capable of.

Let me know if you don't get satisfaction fron Sony.ca ....I'll
make a few phone calls locally here in Western Canada and see if
one of the eight Greater Vancouver Sony retail outlets has it in
stock.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
(Link below)

http://www.ibuyernet.com/prod~id~153374~SONY_RMDR1.htm

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
http://www.pbase.com/image/26045948/medium

I find the F828 lends itself to be customized for individual
needs, to respond to the instructions given it, in a variety of
conditions in the field. Refinements in set up according to my
needs allows more of my attention to go to artistic intent and
visual choices, that directly effect the outcome of photos.
The RV-DR1 remote release is used to trigger the shutter ,
minmizing the possibility of camera movement. This remote release
remains connected, as if part of the camera, with the remote cord
wound with electrical tap and shortened to approx. six inches. A
level is often used outdoors for landscapes (horizontal/vertical)
placed in the flash shoe, eliminating a need for cropping due to
tilted horizons.
It would be interesting to share experiences, and photos of
varying camera setups for follow up discussion, that we may
benefit from a variety of usage.

Norman
 
Hi Norman,

Just a visitor passing by here, but I was taken by the similarity of my setup.

Aside from differences in components etc, I only have one main difference probably caused by my interest in panoramas.

I have added a Manfrotto levelling head (Compact 438) between my 55pro legs and the head. It works really great and I never have to fiddle with the tripods legs to get proper level to allow panning the ballhead. I got so used to the levelling head that it's now permanently there, even if I'm not planning to shoot panoramas.



If you are into wide images, I definetely reccomend it.

Another thing I use that is not visible in your picture is the Manfrotto tripod strap. Very convenient, and another things that I haven't taken off since I installed it.

Claudio

--
http://www.pbase.com/klaudio
 
Hello Claudio,

I enjoyed visiting your galleries, and seeing how the set-up you are using (especially with panos) suits your needs. One notion that I would like to convey in this thread, is that IMO like cameras, the set up we choose is likely to have more to do with suitability relative to ones individual needs, than what is "best" in any absolute sense. The most challenging aspect IMO may be the soul searching required to know oneself, and prioritze ones needs according to ones creative intent.

It may be a usefull exercise for those reading to list set-up priortiies, in field use. Mine are:

1. Weight Reduction: the Manfrooto Cabon One 443 tripod I am using weights 47 oz.. My alternate 055 manfrotto is nearly double the weight at : 85 oz. The 055pro tripod with the excellant 438 leveling head weights: 105oz. Here is a link to a post to Shay regarding sample weight comparisons:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=7667406

2. Handling: My set up combination is designed to be not only light but also very fast in operation. In this regard I find the 20 oz. BH-3 ballhead from Kirk Enterprise is outstanding, for my purposes. The BH-3 has a friction knob for the large omni directional ball - I pre set this knob on the tight side, as I shot on the tripod frequently for wildlife. In this way the camera itself, can be set as both repositionable, and stay where it is placed when framing a subject, all in a single rapid fluid motion. The BH-3 has a pano dial rotatable with fine setting at the base of the head.

3. Stability: here i am looking for adaquate stability. IMO a set-up with a carbon tripod, in conjuntion with a cable release may prevent movement more so than a tripod twice the weight, when hand pressing the shutter. Different systems of usage for different needs and priorites, make for a variety of interesting combinations. Because I prefer to look down on the LCD. I am able to pre shorten the tripod legs, gaining additional stability.

My current combination of F828, tripod, and ball head weight a total of 101 oz. I carry this set-up, at the ready, not on a strap, much like a hunter might moving in a landscape, craddled in the crook of my arm. I enjoy this compact, mobile, light weight, set-up designed for high image capture ratios, and minimizing fatique over a full days outing.

Thank you for your interesting and valued contribution to this thread, expanding alternatives, especially for those where weight may be less of a concideration.

Regards,
Norman
--
NRich

http://www.pbase.com/norman
Hi Norman,

Just a visitor passing by here, but I was taken by the similarity
of my setup.
Aside from differences in components etc, I only have one main
difference probably caused by my interest in panoramas.

I have added a Manfrotto levelling head (Compact 438) between my
55pro legs and the head. It works really great and I never have to
fiddle with the tripods legs to get proper level to allow panning
the ballhead. I got so used to the levelling head that it's now
permanently there, even if I'm not planning to shoot panoramas.

http://www.pbase.com/image/26261302/original .

If you are into wide images, I definetely reccomend it.

Another thing I use that is not visible in your picture is the
Manfrotto tripod strap. Very convenient, and another things that I
haven't taken off since I installed it.

Claudio

--
http://www.pbase.com/klaudio
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top