robert1955
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 8,163
- Solutions
- 10
- Reaction score
- 4,962
Comments on Articles are not part of the current migration. However, as they contain input by members there are relations with the forums, though the software implementation is different.
I think that it would be useful to have a look at how the Comments are operated.
Some pro and cons on the current situation:
+ the way you see Comments can be changed by the reader [new to old, old to new, most popular, staff picks
+ it is directly accessible from the article
- reactions to articles often also come in other places: brand forums for reviews, the new Articles subforum. This could become confusing
- articles [especially the reviews] cover a lot of ground, not alway clear what a commenter is referring to
- often the format seems to encourage a sort of drive-byshooting posting, not leading or even wanting to lead to discussion
I'm not sure how this could be improved.
[This thread is a spin-off from https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/68488478 ]
I think that it would be useful to have a look at how the Comments are operated.
Some pro and cons on the current situation:
+ the way you see Comments can be changed by the reader [new to old, old to new, most popular, staff picks
+ it is directly accessible from the article
- reactions to articles often also come in other places: brand forums for reviews, the new Articles subforum. This could become confusing
- articles [especially the reviews] cover a lot of ground, not alway clear what a commenter is referring to
- often the format seems to encourage a sort of drive-by
I'm not sure how this could be improved.
[This thread is a spin-off from https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/68488478 ]