Can you check if a JPEG has been post-processed or if it is out-of-camera?

[GPSMapNut]

You stated, "Removing such variables makes the level much more even
and allows the judges (who are well aware of the restrictions) to
concentrate on contestants' ability to take good shot instead on
ability to manufacture a photograph."

Perhaps they could solve their dilema by giving everyone a
disposable camera and have them turn them in to the judges. Then
they would truly know who was the "best photographer"! Oh, and by
the way...make them black and white cameras so one cannot use the
crutch of color.

Granted, such contest will not be to everybody's liking but, there
is a whole bunch of people who like it this way so, why not? "

True, I really don't care what they do...it just seems so
artificial to eliminate tools that a true artist can use to
communicate. I can understand not being able to add or subtract
elements to a picture, e.g. putting a Moose into a woodsy sunset
picture.. but, the discussion about whether you should be able to
increase contrast, sharpness, vividness, etc. in camera or after
camera seem moot.
Please....it is only my opinion...
Why is it you can put in your two cents worth, but only get a penny
for your thoughts? What happened to the other penny?
uufda

Another way of looking at it is: It's a contest where everybody is forced to make ALL the shooting decisions at the time they take the shot. Film or digital; you select a subject, position yourself, select the lens, aperture, shutter speed and other settings. You choose the angle, composition and the moment. Half press the shutter and ask yourself: "Is this my final answer?" Than full press thinking "yes, this is my final answer".

Maybe nobody cares about adding contrast or vividness but, regardless of the media used there is no second chances to avoid a distracting elements, blur the background or to crop, correct perspective or horizon levelling. If editing was allowed, there would be no control over such corrections.

That's just my 2 cents worth so, I'm not sure who owes a penny? ;-)

--
Andrew Kalinowski
Photography: http://www.FotoCanada.ca
Maps http://www.topocanada.com
GPS and mapping: http://www.GPSNuts.com Recreational

 

[Intermezzo]

GPSMapnut, thanks for the detailed reply!! No need for apologies at all...

I pretty much agree with everything you've written. On a theoretical level, it's pretty much a no-brainer for one to try to work with files that contain more data bits and are more flexible towards change. However, does all that translate into a discernible improvement in image quality? I'll definitely take a closer look into those areas you mentioned (sharpening artifacts, banding, etc.)

Thanks again.