jb_va2001
Veteran Member
For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
----
JB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have
backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or
damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
I find that I often reorganize my best images to make themn easier
to locate and when I back up this version I now have two copies or
more.
CDs are very cheap. Not everything would be a disaster to lose but
for those images that are important make several copies.
--For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have
backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or
damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
jerry
For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have
backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or
damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
This is actually a very well accepted theory and its being practiced by many large legal firms and photography studios for archiving their data these days. And here is why:IMHO they are the most stable
media for long-term storage. I do not leave them plugged in, I
fill them with valuable files, then take them out of the computer
case, so they aren't running. I'm strongly considering putting
them in a safe-deposit box.
Just a little food for thought...
laptop hard disks have a safe life of 2-3 years and desk top hard
disks 8-10 years. external hard disks usually can be expected to
last 5-6 years. this is the physical expectations. I have crashed
many hard disks over the 25 years I have owned computers (crashed
my first 10MB disk in 1980 which cost me $10,000.00)
Software changes also may make many disks unreadable in 5-10 years.
CDs and DVDs will probably have software changes in less than 5
years. Can anyone read a 5 1/4 inch floppy anymore (and I have 8
inch and 12 inch floppies if you want to really go back.)
Multiple copies on several mediums is certainly safer and you have
to stay abreast of the technology and be prepared to recopy
everything to the next archieve medium when it arrives.
For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have
backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or
damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
I have read all replies and did not see any reference to the type of Media that should be better than others such as CD-R vs CD-RW and DVD- +R vs DVD- +RW media.For those of you storing your images on CDs or DVDs, do you have
backups or two copies of the disk? The risk of loss (corrupted or
damaged disk) seems low, but...
----
JB
--Happy Data Storage to All.
laptop hard disks have a safe life of 2-3 years and desk top hard
disks 8-10 years. external hard disks usually can be expected to
last 5-6 years. this is the physical expectations. I have crashed
many hard disks over the 25 years I have owned computers (crashed
my first 10MB disk in 1980 which cost me $10,000.00)
Software changes also may make many disks unreadable in 5-10 years.
CDs and DVDs will probably have software changes in less than 5
years. Can anyone read a 5 1/4 inch floppy anymore (and I have 8
inch and 12 inch floppies if you want to really go back.)
Multiple copies on several mediums is certainly safer and you have
to stay abreast of the technology and be prepared to recopy
everything to the next archieve medium when it arrives.
Never use RW meterial for achcieving. 3-6 months at most.I have read all replies and did not see any reference to the type
of Media that should be better than others such as CD-R vs CD-RW
and DVD- +R vs DVD- +RW media.
ultra cheap CDs may be bad when you use them. Very few people go back and look at every image on a backup to see if each recorded perfectly.Also, there appears to be different quality CD and DVD media which
may need to be considered. Meaning, are the ultra-cheap Media as
good as the Professional Grade.
There are a lot of test results on the internet showing how really bad RW meterial is for backups of longer than a few monthsI have no proof (just what I have read from those that supposedly
know) that the R media (for both CD and DVD) is better than the RW
media for longevity and quality for archival storage.
It never slips up on us but we put it off until we realise we are too late and in trouble. Things we never though we would use again seem to return and are needed.Regarding future technology should not be something that "slips up"
on us since we have the opportunity to test our previous media with
the newer equipment as well as software so we should NOT overlook
this.
I did not own the 1401 I used in collage or I might have kept a piece.The one poster that has the older disks from some 20+ years ago.
Do you happen to have any of the Disk Platters that we used on the
IBM 1401 and 1460 Computers back in the 1950's and early 1960's
[Grin]....
--
--Vernon...
http://www.pbase.com/vrain
--yup i make 2 copies of all my work - 1 is stored in the office and
the other i store off site
If you are concerned about personal information left on a hard drive, all you need to do is use a program which writes over the files or entire disk several times when you truly want it cleaned of data. I used to work for a company that did work for the military. We had hard drives with Secret information stored on them If the disk was needed for unclassified work, it could be "cleaned" and reused. This was usually done with SCSI drives. The document control people would only approve IDE drive if one could show that no additional sectors had gone bad since the disk was put into service. The concern here was that the built-in controller would mark a sector as bad it it failed a write operation 3 time (or some such number). There was a possibility that classified data could remain on the bad sector and the cleaning software would not be allowed to overwrite that sector. I always felt that was being a little too paranoid. It would require some specialized equipment to read those bad sectors, so I wouldn't worry too much about a buyer of that disk being able to read the data let alone make anything out of it.it is too easy for dishonest people to extract personal
information, even efter you THINK you've deleted it). For the very
reason I don't like selling them,
If you are concerned about personal information left on a hardit is too easy for dishonest people to extract personal
information, even efter you THINK you've deleted it). For the very
reason I don't like selling them,
drive, all you need to do is use a program which writes over the
files or entire disk several times when you truly want it cleaned
of data. I used to work for a company that did work for the
military. We had hard drives with Secret information stored on
them If the disk was needed for unclassified work, it could be
"cleaned" and reused. This was usually done with SCSI drives. The
document control people would only approve IDE drive if one could
show that no additional sectors had gone bad since the disk was put
into service. The concern here was that the built-in controller
would mark a sector as bad it it failed a write operation 3 time
(or some such number). There was a possibility that classified
data could remain on the bad sector and the cleaning software would
not be allowed to overwrite that sector. I always felt that was
being a little too paranoid. It would require some specialized
equipment to read those bad sectors, so I wouldn't worry too much
about a buyer of that disk being able to read the data let alone
make anything out of it.
Norton sells a utility for doing what I have been describing. The
operation is known as a "government wipe." By the way, even if you
aren't selling an old drive, there are other reasons for erasing
files so others can never retrieve them. You can figure out what
those reasons might be. The point is that it can be done. It just
takes a little longer to permanently erase a file.
Dewdrop