Guy Parsons
Forum Pro
Way back in my 35mm film days I used my two daughters' weddings as experiments as to what lens is best. The hired photog did his thing and I casually worked around him and did not interfere with his work.Now with mirrorless I haave an 85 because it is a great lens at a great price, and it is easier to crop in on a computer than it is to make a print in an enlarger.
Wedding 1 tried using only a 105mm lens but found it frustrating due to the distance required made me "lose contact" with the subjects too often in a busy wedding environment. I was after head and shoulders mainly.
Wedding 2 a year later and I deliberately bought an 85mm lens to try, perfection, it worked fine for the head and shoulders and also for occasional full height but only when I could separate the subject from distractions.
For me the exercise cemented the idea in my head that 85mm was perfect for the portraits, 105mm was just a bit too long.
Now with M4/3 of course that task is done with a 45mm as being close enough, though a 42.5mm is also available. The 45/1.8 on a small M4/3 body is way less intimidating to a nervous subject than any FF equivalent setup.
Now waiting for grandchildrens' weddings to happen so I can test further.