a7r4 compared to 24mp aps-c, base iso100, final.

[Advent1sam]

... I am fully sold on aps-c, have been since digital DSLR, FF is unnecessary for the majority of people imo

When will you figure out that nobody cares about your opinion about what is unnecessary for the majority of people? By all means, decide for yourself what's good enough and what's practical enough and what's economical enough for you and leave others out of it.

All these tests of yours have done a spectacular job of confirming that more resolution is objectively better at recording detail than less resolution, so they have indeed served a purpose. Time to let the subjective opinionizing go now, hmm?

Wow, you need to relax a little and stop opining about my opinion's and provide something constructive too,

I've provided plenty of constructive input with facts explaining that hardware resolution advantages are real, while pointing out that you offer nothing but opinions about what is enough and what should be enough for other people.

if you don't like ai, cool, walk on by...

I have never said or implied such a thing in any of my posts in your three different threads on this subject. What I have said repeatedly is that AI can be applicable to every image, so poorer hardware resolution can never catch up to better hardware resolution despite AI.

Like I say, if others want to carry an a7r4/3/2/1 or any other MF/FF or aps-c or m43, that's entirely your/their prerogative. I stand by my conclusion, if you don't or others don't cool, I am trying to help people not hold them back, the results from 24mp are ostensibly the same in print from any aps-c,FF,MF, the difference is just framing/skill/lens/opportunity........

You've made your point about your opinion in three threads now. How many do you think it takes to make the point that you personally are happy with your 24MP APS-C camera's resolution? I see the word final in the title of this one, so I hope that is the answer.

Man, you are angry, chill!

Oh, I'm being much nicer to you than you deserve.

No, you are a rude arrogant guy, you deserve less time than I'm giving you!

For one thing, I have to keep reminding you of what I've actually written in these threads, which is irritating. You haven't seen me angry.

I'm happy to test you

Fine, let's go there.

you seem old and outdated

You seem young and stupid.

your comments are from someone with a closed mentality

I think you're talking about yourself.

why aren't you on FF, wouldn't that suit you better, aps-c 24mp obviously is not enough for you?

Ah, there we go ... you're either stupid, or uninterested in actually reading and understanding what you see, or both. I already posted this, but of course you have no clue that it happened:

"Everyone is welcome to answer the simple question How many pixels is enough? based on his own situation. I personally own no camera with higher resolution than 24MP, and most of the time I use cameras with lower resolution than that. They are 'enough'."

Are you beginning to understand what's wrong with you?

I know what is wrong with you, yes.

Another stupid reply that shows your inability to read, comprehend, and respond.

Sure

 

[GaryW]

... I am fully sold on aps-c, have been since digital DSLR, FF is unnecessary for the majority of people imo

When will you figure out that nobody cares about your opinion about what is unnecessary for the majority of people?

Well, if I can be pedantic, a cellphone is going to be the best camera for the majority of people.

You might want to express that opinion once, maybe twice. Why would you make three separate threads about that, conducting 'tests' that you (incorrectly) imagine justify your opinion being appropriate for others?

I haven't made 3 separate threads about that.

Why would you think people care about your - or anyone's - pedantry?

It's not my fault if you can't follow the thread.

By all means, decide for yourself what's good enough and what's practical enough and what's economical enough for you and leave others out of it.

All these tests of yours have done a spectacular job of confirming that more resolution is objectively better at recording detail than less resolution, so they have indeed served a purpose. Time to let the subjective opinionizing go now, hmm?

If we didn't post opinions, this forum would be even less interesting (and active) than it already is. Or something. ;-)

One opinion thread, okay, Two opinion threads on the same thing - pushing it. Three opinion threads on the same thing - too much.

 

[sybersitizen]

... I am fully sold on aps-c, have been since digital DSLR, FF is unnecessary for the majority of people imo

When will you figure out that nobody cares about your opinion about what is unnecessary for the majority of people?

Well, if I can be pedantic, a cellphone is going to be the best camera for the majority of people.

You might want to express that opinion once, maybe twice. Why would you make three separate threads about that, conducting 'tests' that you (incorrectly) imagine justify your opinion being appropriate for others?

I haven't made 3 separate threads about that.

Of course 'you' haven't. The 'you' was hypothetical.

Why would you think people care about your - or anyone's - pedantry?

It's not my fault if you can't follow the thread.

Another hypothetical 'you', I see. Gosh, this has been so fun. So fun.

By all means, decide for yourself what's good enough and what's practical enough and what's economical enough for you and leave others out of it.

All these tests of yours have done a spectacular job of confirming that more resolution is objectively better at recording detail than less resolution, so they have indeed served a purpose. Time to let the subjective opinionizing go now, hmm?

If we didn't post opinions, this forum would be even less interesting (and active) than it already is. Or something. ;-)

One opinion thread, okay, Two opinion threads on the same thing - pushing it. Three opinion threads on the same thing - too much.