Ed Leys20479
Senior Member
Observatory
No, it's not brand new. An old one from the digital shoebox. (Okay, it's not a very big shoebox...)
Still, it's never appeared in this forum before. In truth, it's never appeared anywhere before. Oh, there might have been a buried link or two that was intended to trace out a certain point. And I know a few friends have followed that link and have seen something before that might be mistaken for this. But that other one was originally taken in my camera's highest quality jpeg mode. This one was not, and my camera renders colors differently each way.
Kinda cool, it's almost like I can run two different kinds of film through it.
Oh, that link? I'd put it here so you could see how your thoughts maybe compared with those ancient other thoughts, but they're renovating that part of the site and stuff is not available. Well, maybe stuff will never be available again.
I remember a couple though... "The ratings on this picture look like they were generated by a random number generator" and "This is a complete waste of film, I'd give it zero stars if I could." Well, maybe the second person said "minus one stars if I could". It's old, memory fades. One thing I know though, I clearly said it was taken with a digital camera. No film was harmed in the making of this photograph...
Canon PowerShot A50; raw mode
No, it's not brand new. An old one from the digital shoebox. (Okay, it's not a very big shoebox...)
Still, it's never appeared in this forum before. In truth, it's never appeared anywhere before. Oh, there might have been a buried link or two that was intended to trace out a certain point. And I know a few friends have followed that link and have seen something before that might be mistaken for this. But that other one was originally taken in my camera's highest quality jpeg mode. This one was not, and my camera renders colors differently each way.
Kinda cool, it's almost like I can run two different kinds of film through it.
Oh, that link? I'd put it here so you could see how your thoughts maybe compared with those ancient other thoughts, but they're renovating that part of the site and stuff is not available. Well, maybe stuff will never be available again.
I remember a couple though... "The ratings on this picture look like they were generated by a random number generator" and "This is a complete waste of film, I'd give it zero stars if I could." Well, maybe the second person said "minus one stars if I could". It's old, memory fades. One thing I know though, I clearly said it was taken with a digital camera. No film was harmed in the making of this photograph...
Canon PowerShot A50; raw mode