And why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Or what you can do with one hand at the controls.And why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
Regards,
Alan
under your budget context, u see a justificationAnd why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
Good enough for me.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
I like your gear list !under your budget context, u see a justificationAnd why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
but from my view, too often I see folks spilling money, and then spending even more by overlapping and upgrading, when They would have done better with the right gear in the first place, even if it meant to wait while they were saving
a lot of times this is lack of experience on the existing options
It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
R2
Love my Siggys too!Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
R2
A sharp Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for the Canon EF-M mount is just a little over $200 used in like new condition ? For real ?
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/sigma-30mm-f-1-4-dn-canon-ef-m-fit
Right ? And the buttons and the 3 dials and the touch of silver on the top ?Love my Siggys too!Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
R2
A sharp Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for the Canon EF-M mount is just a little over $200 used in like new condition ? For real ?
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/sigma-30mm-f-1-4-dn-canon-ef-m-fit
For me what sets the M6ii apart is the crazy good autofocus (not necessarily the MP).
R2
mine has the RF 24-105 F4L stuck on it - I love this lensI like your gear list !under your budget context, u see a justificationAnd why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
but from my view, too often I see folks spilling money, and then spending even more by overlapping and upgrading, when They would have done better with the right gear in the first place, even if it meant to wait while they were saving
a lot of times this is lack of experience on the existing options
My RP has the 100L stuck on it !
for me I'm looking to eek out mpxl's from my m6II with my 32 and 11-22not necessarily the MP).Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
R2
A sharp Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for the Canon EF-M mount is just a little over $200 used in like new condition ? For real ?
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/sigma-30mm-f-1-4-dn-canon-ef-m-fit
R2
You could sell that lens for more than you paid for it ?mine has the RF 24-105 F4L stuck on it - I love this lensI like your gear list !under your budget context, u see a justificationAnd why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
but from my view, too often I see folks spilling money, and then spending even more by overlapping and upgrading, when They would have done better with the right gear in the first place, even if it meant to wait while they were saving
a lot of times this is lack of experience on the existing options
My RP has the 100L stuck on it !
Sometimes go to sleep looking at my M6II with the 32mm on it and have this fantasy that the 32mm is my only lens, the only one I want, the only one I need.for me I'm looking to eek out mpxl's from my m6II with my 32 and 11-22not necessarily the MP).Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?It's the right tool for what I use it for.Is it able to resolve good enough in combination with the 32MP sensor of the M6ii?
R2
A sharp Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for the Canon EF-M mount is just a little over $200 used in like new condition ? For real ?
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/sigma-30mm-f-1-4-dn-canon-ef-m-fit
R2
Well yeah, that too. Plus the 32 MP, plus the super-responsive operation, plus the tilting LCD, plus... :-DRight ? And the buttons and the 3 dials and the touch of silver on the top ?Love my Siggys too!Us spoiled M users like the sharp stuff for sure. Every EF-M lens is better off on a M6II though ?
A sharp Sigma 30mm f/1.4 for the Canon EF-M mount is just a little over $200 used in like new condition ? For real ?
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/sigma-30mm-f-1-4-dn-canon-ef-m-fit
For me what sets the M6ii apart is the crazy good autofocus (not necessarily the MP).
R2
I sleep with it next to me.
be patientYou could sell that lens for more than you paid for it ?mine has the RF 24-105 F4L stuck on it - I love this lensI like your gear list !under your budget context, u see a justificationAnd why settle for an M body and the 56/1.4 when life is short and you should be using an R3 with an RF 85/1.2L.
Everyone has a different budget. For some, adapting the Canon 50/1.8 STM is the best option within their budget. For others, it's the old Sigma 60/2.8. For others, it's the Sigma 56/1.4. And for yet others it's the RF 85/1.2L.
It's great that we have all of these options. Each has its place.
but from my view, too often I see folks spilling money, and then spending even more by overlapping and upgrading, when They would have done better with the right gear in the first place, even if it meant to wait while they were saving
a lot of times this is lack of experience on the existing options
My RP has the 100L stuck on it !
The 100L is up about $200 !
Sick that I did not click when the RF24-105L was cheap. I saw the sale too. Had the money. Sick.
