S120- An Almost Forgotten Gem

3Percent

Senior Member
Messages
1,741
Reaction score
2,142
If you get the chance to find a good condition S120, grab it. This camera punches way above its specifications and still feels like a modern offering amongst the mirrorless and 1" sensor compact craze.

Lately I've had a blast combing through and optimizing my camera gear, keeping only the very best camera's and lenses from my massive kit. One of those survivors is the Canon Powershot S120, which I chose over several compacts to keep.

Literally this is a compact camera- it's tiny and yet powerful. Easily stick it in your pants or shirt pocket without hesitation. You won't experience the discomfort of carrying it this way for long periods of time either, as it is about half the size and weight of the average smart phone. It's so small, that it's less intimidating or noticeable than even a smart phone- so it makes for a great street camera.

Build quality is definitely above average, the entire camera less the card/battery compartment door is metal, and the rear lcd screen is touch screen glass. The buttons and dials and other controls definitely feel premium as well. The popup flash is activated by a switch on the side and snaps quickly up into action.

The face of the camera is a bit slippery, so an aftermarket micro grip or grip tape/tabs are recommended for more secure holding if this is a nuisance to you. The rear has a very nice and secure rubber rest for the thumb that helps tremendously with one handed shooting.

It's got wifi, time lapse movies in camera, touch screen, built in flash, customizable controls, and... it makes much higher quality images than most smart phones. There's enough customization options and controls to please the professional as well, so long as practical expectations are managed.

It's files are useable all the way up to 2,500 ISO without falling apart to the point of color bleeding or too much loss of dynamic range. Base ISO looks better than many m4/3 sensor cameras I've had in the past (and even some older APS-C!), and you can make a sharp 20x30" print with it. The total ISO range is 80-12,800, but I would stay away from the max ISO setting (6,400

Talk about a great lens too, a 24-120mm equivalent unit that shoots f/1.8 on the wide end, changing to f/5.7 on the long end. At 35mm the max aperture is still f/2.8, and it doesn't hit f/4 until about 65mm, and stills gives you an f/4.5 max aperture at 85mm equivalent- with awesome lens based image stabilization to boot. Macro performance is impressive, and at 85mm equivalent the min distance to subject is about 7", which gives you great close up performance and subject distance. That is my favorite setting for closeups.

Practically this means you won't have to boost your ISO often at all. The lens sweet spot is about f/2.8 to f/4, the latter of which I use to shoot landscapes to get the most detail and performance out of the lens and sensor combination. Wide open you'll see some softening in the corners and a touch of CA in the raw files, but the Jpegs seem well corrected and look very decent out of camera if you tweak the standard settings.

If you want the ultimate light traveler camera, this is one on a very short list I'd recommend. No it doesn't have a viewfinder but if you can live without that, its the smallest, lightest, full featured camera I'd recommend above and beyond anything else for a pocketable photo making solution.
 
Great review. It is pity that they are no longer making those 1/8'' cameras. Another great compact camera is Panasonic LF1 with long focal length up to 200mm and a small EVF. They are in similar size and sensor.
 
Great review. It is pity that they are no longer making those 1/8'' cameras. Another great compact camera is Panasonic LF1 with long focal length up to 200mm and a small EVF. They are in similar size and sensor.
Agreed. And this one has a slightly larger sensor than that too. 1 1/7" plus it's BSI, which really helped it to be the highest rated sensor of this class of all time.

The LF1 is another, agreed.
 
Nice review. It's immediate predecessor, the S110, is also a very nice camera but can often be found at a much lower price point.
 
Nice review. It's immediate predecessor, the S110, is also a very nice camera but can often be found at a much lower price point.
Agreed. And I really like the minimalist grip on the S100, not sure why they dropped that, it was near perfection.
 
I agree wholeheartedly. There hasn't been anything to equal it since, and my S120 is still going strong. It's still my main hiking and travel camera.
 
I agree wholeheartedly. There hasn't been anything to equal it since, and my S120 is still going strong. It's still my main hiking and travel camera.
Amazing little camera. Too good to be true. I had one laying around with broken dpad, broken zoom, broken LCD but still took pictures lol. I think I eventually trashed it during a move. I guess the G7X G5X G9X were spiritual successors but all limited in some way compared to S120, though admittedly the smaller sensor size also a limitation on the S120 in comparison.
 
Last edited:
I agree wholeheartedly. There hasn't been anything to equal it since, and my S120 is still going strong. It's still my main hiking and travel camera.
Amazing little camera. Too good to be true. I had one laying around with broken dpad, broken zoom, broken LCD but still took pictures lol. I think I eventually trashed it during a move. I guess the G7X G5X G9X were spiritual successors but all limited in some way compared to S120, though admittedly the smaller sensor size also a limitation on the S120 in comparison.
I got one used and I also think it is a great little camera. Everything just seems to work nicely.
Small sensor makes for infinite depth of field :-)
 
My wife has an s120 that works perfectly. It is a great camera and very robust. It has received many drops and bumps and still works.
But she believes that the current cameras should improve a lot compared to one of so many years.
I've been looking at the current G9x, G7x and G5x and the specs aren't much better except for the 1-inch sensor and DIGIC processor. I don't know if she will notice a significant improvement with a G9x, G7x or G5x. The question is, is it worth spending the money for a new camera of these having an excellent s120?
 
My wife has an s120 that works perfectly. It is a great camera and very robust. It has received many drops and bumps and still works.
But she believes that the current cameras should improve a lot compared to one of so many years.
I've been looking at the current G9x, G7x and G5x and the specs aren't much better except for the 1-inch sensor and DIGIC processor. I don't know if she will notice a significant improvement with a G9x, G7x or G5x. The question is, is it worth spending the money for a new camera of these having an excellent s120?
Value is in the eye of the beholder. If shes doing large prints, yes, if not, no. ;)
 
My wife has an s120 that works perfectly. It is a great camera and very robust. It has received many drops and bumps and still works.
But she believes that the current cameras should improve a lot compared to one of so many years.
I've been looking at the current G9x, G7x and G5x and the specs aren't much better except for the 1-inch sensor and DIGIC processor. I don't know if she will notice a significant improvement with a G9x, G7x or G5x. The question is, is it worth spending the money for a new camera of these having an excellent s120?
Probably not. Honestly except for the optical zoom a modern phone camera will do a similar or better SOOC job in most situations.

If shooting a lot of low light then the 1" can help in comparison to the S120. Even then, the night modes on Pixel cameras are very impressive and if get something like Pixel 6 Pro have a 4x optical.

Of course a phone can't replace that feel of holding a real camera. Not sure how much she values that. I keep my G7X mark 1 just for that even though I use my Pixel 6a for all shooting, I can't seem to let go of my G7X.
 
Great review. I remember having this camera years ago and I just picked one up relatively cheap on eBay because I missed the portability. It seems like it’s in great shape but I am getting some center softness as if there is no actual focal point (nothing is completely sharp). It’s happening with slightly longer shutter speeds like 1/15 and 1/4… but I’m using a flash so, IS or not, it shouldn’t be an issue, right? I’m gonna try more tests at smaller apertures- but just wondering if anyone else has noticed soft focus across the frame. I’m not expecting the sharpness of an A7m4…. but it still feels soft for a 10 year old P&S.

PS Adding a photo I just took as an example. Settings were JPEG / 1/250 F4.5 ISO 80. Let me know if I’m being a diva - I focused on that Jeep’s car door handle with auto focus and the photo looks fine but not usably sharp anywhere. Thoughts? (Here’s a link to the photo as well): https://share.icloud.com/photos/082xI7UMSCo2HJRvYRdQQQR2A

b0abdb15a8d343f5b2bb4e3d579ce3a6.jpg
 
Last edited:
Great review. It is pity that they are no longer making those 1/8'' cameras. Another great compact camera is Panasonic LF1 with long focal length up to 200mm and a small EVF. They are in similar size and sensor.
Got L-F1, my main belt camera, small but useful EVF, and sometimes S100 or S95, how are they compared to S120?
 
Never updated to the S120 but still have my S95 and S100. Great little cameras. Nice review.
Same here, have not tested them aginst each other, good enough when it's not too dark.
 
Great review. It is pity that they are no longer making those 1/8'' cameras. Another great compact camera is Panasonic LF1 with long focal length up to 200mm and a small EVF. They are in similar size and sensor.
Got L-F1, my main belt camera, small but useful EVF, and sometimes S100 or S95, how are they compared to S120?
The lens in the S120 is better than the S100, and its more fully featured. I've had all the S series powershots. The S95 is very decent if you want old school and CCD, different lens too. I liked the S100's minimalist grip the most. It was near perfection for a compact.
 
I had an S120 for four years or so before I got the dreaded lens warning. I've tried several fixes and even sent it away, but it seems irreparable, which is a shame, as I agree with all the points here. The S120 was a great camera indeed, for all sorts of things, even insects in flight.



59e6cd5b3c31447892998e53381a2997.jpg



It was the camera that really got me into macro, and some of you may remember the thread I started that documented my foray into using achromats with my S120. I'd buy another in a heartbeat if they weren't so darn expensive....

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4184440
 
While I had an S120 also for quite some time, I traded it in for a G9x without losing money and I never looked back. Yes there's fewer buttons and the range is worse, but its still pocketable and delivers...!
 
While I had an S120 also for quite some time, I traded it in for a G9x without losing money and I never looked back. Yes there's fewer buttons and the range is worse, but its still pocketable and delivers...!
That's a camera I didn't expect to like, and ended up loving. I may still get the G9XII some day, this time in black, and not champagne silver (it was the color in the end that I couldn't live with).
 
Great cameras, that are fetching strong prices on eBay. I use my S100 regularly.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top