What is purple and green colors on this picture?

Salgado Photo

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
377
Reaction score
138
Location
Orlando, FL, US
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?



80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg



Thanks!
 
Solution
If you have Photoshop, you can use Camera Raw to correct chromatic aberrations.

The pipette tool of this section can help to determine precizely which color to desaturate.
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?

80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg

Thanks!
It looks like chromatic aberrations. Various software can detect and improve without affecting the rest of the picture. Hopefully, you shot RAW, as there is are more options to fix it well. Generally, it is under a "Lens Correction" menu. Photoshop has lens correction options, but I would prefer using DxO PL5. Search for "how to fix lens aberrations," and you will get many tutorials.
 
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?

80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg

Thanks!
The way it's red where its just going out of focus close to the camera and green where the background is just going out of focus looks like longitudinal chromatic aberration. I think Canon's DPP4 calls it 'color blur'; it's a classic fault of fast long lenses used wide open, and difficult to correct, though Canon's Digital Lens Optimizer (DLO) makes a decent stab at it for Canon lenses in camera or within DPP4. Easier to avoid if you stop down a bit, get further from the background and use less contrasty lighting, but most of that's the opposite of what you were trying to do there. Or use a super expensive fluorite and/or apochromatic lens.
 
Last edited:
fast FE lenses suffered from LCA more, I think RF glass controls it very well - could not see it until I zoomed in all the way.

It is a pretty much 1 click eyedropper fix in lightroom, not so sure about photoshop, perhaps within camera raw import menu.



8a9192355376417caa6ca97abda50360.jpg.png
 
Ok thanks, I only use DPP4 and Photoshop. I am sure between one of them I can do it.
 
If you have Photoshop, you can use Camera Raw to correct chromatic aberrations.

The pipette tool of this section can help to determine precizely which color to desaturate.
 
Solution
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?

80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg

Thanks!
The way it's red where its just going out of focus close to the camera and green where the background is just going out of focus looks like longitudinal chromatic aberration. I think Canon's DPP4 calls it 'color blur'; it's a classic fault of fast long lenses used wide open, and difficult to correct, though Canon's Digital Lens Optimizer (DLO) makes a decent stab at it for Canon lenses in camera or within DPP4. Easier to avoid if you stop down a bit, get further from the background and use less contrasty lighting, but most of that's the opposite of what you were trying to do there. Or use a super expensive fluorite and/or apochromatic lens.
There is no such thing as a true APO design for a lens with focusing in it. It's impossible. A telescope can be made APO because it works at a single focal length. If anything moves inside it will be off slightly, end of story. That is why zooms are worse than primes, more elements moving around = more fluctuations in acuity and aberrations.

It wouldn't surprise me if he could retake the photo at a different distance and show no LCA whatsoever.

As for APO designations on consumer lenses, it's all wholly untrue. Not even fluorite lenses are 100% APO. That is why Canon has never ever put "APO" on a lens even when they do use fluorite.

--
"I see you're using an old style, I wondered where you learned it from?"
"You know very well, it's yours too."
 
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?

80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg

Thanks!
The way it's red where its just going out of focus close to the camera and green where the background is just going out of focus looks like longitudinal chromatic aberration. I think Canon's DPP4 calls it 'color blur'; it's a classic fault of fast long lenses used wide open, and difficult to correct, though Canon's Digital Lens Optimizer (DLO) makes a decent stab at it for Canon lenses in camera or within DPP4. Easier to avoid if you stop down a bit, get further from the background and use less contrasty lighting, but most of that's the opposite of what you were trying to do there. Or use a super expensive fluorite and/or apochromatic lens.
There is no such thing as a true APO design for a lens with focusing in it. It's impossible. A telescope can be made APO because it works at a single focal length. If anything moves inside it will be off slightly, end of story. That is why zooms are worse than primes, more elements moving around = more fluctuations in acuity and aberrations.

It wouldn't surprise me if he could retake the photo at a different distance and show no LCA whatsoever.

As for APO designations on consumer lenses, it's all wholly untrue. Not even fluorite lenses are 100% APO. That is why Canon has never ever put "APO" on a lens even when they do use fluorite.
I thought control of CA was one of the features of the expensive RF 50 f/1.2 used by the OP. Did it just limited CA effect?

I liked using my EF 85 f/1.8 so much I bought the RF 85 f/1.2. Partially to correct the huge CA in the cheaper EF 85.

--
"Very funny, Scotty! Now beam me down my clothes."
"He's dead, Jim! You grab his tri-corder. I'll get his wallet."
 
I am trying to learn more so I do not want to use the wrong terms here. Is the purple and green tinted area there if I had looked closer in real world or is this like an aberration? If it is how do I avoid it? Or is it like a one click fix in photoshop?

80a6eb88f6f449488c7fa6df18dc4c19.jpg

Thanks!
The way it's red where its just going out of focus close to the camera and green where the background is just going out of focus looks like longitudinal chromatic aberration. I think Canon's DPP4 calls it 'color blur'; it's a classic fault of fast long lenses used wide open, and difficult to correct, though Canon's Digital Lens Optimizer (DLO) makes a decent stab at it for Canon lenses in camera or within DPP4. Easier to avoid if you stop down a bit, get further from the background and use less contrasty lighting, but most of that's the opposite of what you were trying to do there. Or use a super expensive fluorite and/or apochromatic lens.
There is no such thing as a true APO design for a lens with focusing in it. It's impossible. A telescope can be made APO because it works at a single focal length. If anything moves inside it will be off slightly, end of story. That is why zooms are worse than primes, more elements moving around = more fluctuations in acuity and aberrations.

It wouldn't surprise me if he could retake the photo at a different distance and show no LCA whatsoever.

As for APO designations on consumer lenses, it's all wholly untrue. Not even fluorite lenses are 100% APO. That is why Canon has never ever put "APO" on a lens even when they do use fluorite.
I thought control of CA was one of the features of the expensive RF 50 f/1.2 used by the OP. Did it just limited CA effect?
All modern lenses "feature" control of CA. Compared to the old EF 50mm the new one is much better.

You never know what you're looking at on the internet. Weird saturation adjustments maybe? You never know.

It could just be a random slightly worse copy. Or the shot just taken at a bad distance for the lens. Most lenses start to lose fidelity near their minimum. This looks close to it for a 50mm.



I liked using my EF 85 f/1.8 so much I bought the RF 85 f/1.2. Partially to correct the huge CA in the cheaper EF 85.
--
"I see you're using an old style, I wondered where you learned it from?"
"You know very well, it's yours too."
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top