jbcohen
Senior Member
Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, and some of the programs are pretty good. GIMP, RawTherapee, quite a few others. They're all free, try 'em out. I have.Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
Here are a few:Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
The problem with most, if not all editors for Linux is that they are not well color managed. Generally working spaces like ProPhotoRGB are not available for them; unless things have changed since I last looked at that option.Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
I do my photo editing on linux for approximately 10 years now.Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
You will get responses from Linux users that there are some good photo editing software that runs on Linux machines and they are right.Any onne ever used Linux for their digital photography? Can you get photo editing software for linux?
Yes, I think the key is familiarity for many of us when it comes to complex software. As a 3-4 year Lightroom user, I've been testing the open source program Darktable (for which there is a Linux version) off and on for awhile now, but fairly intensively for over a week now to get a reasonably good feel for it. It has a steep learning curve but I'm finding it a LOT more than sufficient. It has quite a bit more control than Lightroom and quite a few of the other paid programs as well. It's certainly not "basic". GIMP, which runs on multiple platforms has most of the functionality of Photoshop so I wouldn't call it basic either. Much of it is simply a matter of personal preferences.However, if you have developed proficiency using Windows with programs like Photoshop, Lightroom, DXO Optics Pro, ON1 Photo, Capture One, Perfect Photo Suite, PortraitPro Studio, etc, etc, then you may find yourself hampered by the Linux program's capabilities and user interfaces. I have and use those programs regularly (each chosen for their capabilities for a given photo) and have developed reasonable proficiency with them. I have a computer running Linux and have tried Linux programs and feel I cannot achieve the same results I can with my Windows programs, but that is just me.
If however, free and not Windows is your objective then the Linux offerings will suffice for basic photo editing.
--
"There is a little of not done yet in all of us."
John Madden, football coach
The problem with the GIMP, is the working space, which defaults to sRGB, and its recommended working space is also sRGB, which is inadequate for many users. It used to also work with AdobeRGB, but had problems in the past with ProPhotoRGB.Off course. Try Google for keywords photo editing and Linux. I use for years photography editing and managing under Linux. I never did that with Windows.
Operating system: Ubuntu 14.04
Photo Managing: Shotwell
Raw Developement: Darktable (new 2.0 version)
Further Editing: Gimp 2.9 (actual non stable version with 16-bit support)
If I'm not misinterpreting the settings dialog, the working space can be configured. For people that do not make use of color management sRGB is a reasonable default. i never heard about ProPhotoRGB issues. Anyway, there are massive changes in 2.9, also affecting the color management [1].The problem with the GIMP, is the working space, which defaults to sRGB, and its recommended working space is also sRGB, which is inadequate for many users. It used to also work with AdobeRGB, but had problems in the past with ProPhotoRGB.Off course. Try Google for keywords photo editing and Linux. I use for years photography editing and managing under Linux. I never did that with Windows.
Operating system: Ubuntu 14.04
Photo Managing: Shotwell
Raw Developement: Darktable (new 2.0 version)
Further Editing: Gimp 2.9 (actual non stable version with 16-bit support)
It is a photography based forum, there will be lots of users here running monitors with a native gamut that covers most of AdobeRGB, and some areas out of AdobeRGB gamut. And the monitor gamut isn't the only thing that matters, avoiding clipping while editing is desirable. Once clipped, there is noway of getting a color back.Many? I could also say many user don't need other than SRGB, as most monitors are SRGB only. If some professionial or high enthusiast need or just want to work with AdobeRGB, then yes, it can be problemtic. The real problem comes with CMYK for printer. Gimp does not support CMYK. There are some awkward solutions.
At least Darktable the Raw converter should support AdobeRGB, if I am not mistaken.
--
· http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackhole_eater/
· (All photos are creative common licensed. Check them out.)
· English is not my native language.
I hoped to avoid this thread, but wanted to thank you for the news. I did not know about ProPhotoRGB support, evident in this 2.9 screenshot.If I'm not misinterpreting the settings dialog, the working space can be configured. For people that do not make use of color management sRGB is a reasonable default. i never heard about ProPhotoRGB issues. Anyway, there are massive changes in 2.9, also affecting the color management [1].
[1] http://www.gimp.org/news/2015/11/27/gimp-2-9-2-released/
So far, I have seen no evidence that gimp cannot manage larger color spaces.It is a photography based forum, there will be lots of users here running monitors with a native gamut that covers most of AdobeRGB, and some areas out of AdobeRGB gamut. And the monitor gamut isn't the only thing that matters, avoiding clipping while editing is desirable. Once clipped, there is noway of getting a color back.Many? I could also say many user don't need other than SRGB, as most monitors are SRGB only. If some professionial or high enthusiast need or just want to work with AdobeRGB, then yes, it can be problemtic. The real problem comes with CMYK for printer. Gimp does not support CMYK. There are some awkward solutions.
At least Darktable the Raw converter should support AdobeRGB, if I am not mistaken.
--
· http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackhole_eater/
· (All photos are creative common licensed. Check them out.)
· English is not my native language.
Brian A
This is not new in 2.9. Gimp is color managed -- don't know exactly since when, but since 2.8 for sure. So there is basically no reason to assume that prophoto is not supported. BTW: This is a screenshot of a dialog for selecting icc files and not a list of supported color spacesI hoped to avoid this thread, but wanted to thank you for the news. I did not know about ProPhotoRGB support, evident in this 2.9 screenshot.If I'm not misinterpreting the settings dialog, the working space can be configured. For people that do not make use of color management sRGB is a reasonable default. i never heard about ProPhotoRGB issues. Anyway, there are massive changes in 2.9, also affecting the color management [1].
[1] http://www.gimp.org/news/2015/11/27/gimp-2-9-2-released/
![]()
from gimp.org/news
Late last year I downloaded GIMP 2.9 for experimentation, and it was a bit rough. GIMP 2.10 is supposed to be the one ready for production. Here is the current roadmap for future releases:
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Roadmap#GIMP_2.10
Correct about color management. Often I edit DPreview posted photos in AdobeRGB color space, and GIMP offers to convert them for me.This is not new in 2.9. Gimp is color managed -- don't know exactly since when, but since 2.8 for sure. So there is basically no reason to assume that prophoto is not supported.