Visiting the Milky Way - and some galaxies

Nordstjernen

Veteran Member
Messages
6,876
Solutions
5
Reaction score
2,188
Location
Molde, NO
Here are some recent photographs made with my small 10.6 cm telescope and my A900 (not modified). All pictures are exposed for one to two hours, made up from 5 minute single exposures that are stacked. Focal length 530 mm, aperture f:5 at ISO 1600. Auto guided Losmandy G-11 equatorial mount.

The camera was focused with the Remote Camera Control software that came with the camera and a laptop PC. This kind of focus check works very well for critical work -- much better than using the LCD for checking at high magnification as I did earlier.

I think my tecnique is improved a bit! I am amazed with the amount of detail and how deep the camera goes -- dark nebulas and galaxies fainter than magnitude 18.

Enjoy!

BELOW: The cocon-nebula is a small emission nebula in the Milky Way, surrounded by dark clouds of interstellar dust. You can easily follow the dark rivers that are formed by thiese dark clouds as they block light from the stars in the background.



BELOW: This small and bright reflection nebula is found in the constellation of Cepheus. The two hour exposure reveals clouds of dark dust shattering the field of view.



BELOW: This faint emission nebula is hard to photograph with DSRL cameras, since the hydrogen alpha (Ha) response is limited. Still the nebula stands out against a star rich area in the Milky Way.



BELOW: Another emission nebula, the Caliifornia nebula. This is also a faint object and it takes some working with the files to get an acceptable result.



BELOW: A bright and very beautiful reflection nebula, the Pleiades. With a pair of binoculars some of the nebulous can be seen against a dark sky. Here the long exposure has gained a lot of fine structures -- my best photo of this object!



BELOW: All the pictures above shows astronomical objects in our galaxy, the Milky Way system. Here are two other galaxies found in Ursa Major, the spiral galaxy M81 to the left (same type as the Milky Way) and the irregular and distorted M82 to the right.

 
Unless I've missed some, I'd say you outdid yourself with these.
--
From the original Pheanix:
'Shoot first (pictures that is); ask questions later'
Keith (me) - the original pheanix
 
i feel peace like i am dreaming then i pinch myself to get back to reality. excellent.
--
cuong aka buzz
--
http://www.insightfolio.com/
--
carl zeiss lenses do matter to me.
 
Excellent as usual! I see your work & I wonder if anyone on the other forums is doing anything that comes even close? Have you seen this sort of stuff presented elsewhere on dpreview?
--
AEH
http://aehass.zenfolio.com/
Question: What do you do all week?
Answer: Mon to Fri. Nothing, Sat & Sun I rest!
 
What amazes me is how well and bright the Merope nebula in the Pleiades has come out. While all the other shots are extremely good, I've been able to see the galaxies by eye, and the California and others with either by eye or with an O111 or UHC filter. But the Merope nebula has always eluded me. Yet here it is - the brightest of the lot.

I envy your mount too.
Cheers,
Renato
 
Amazing pictures & it's sobering to think that the people out there don't have any of the cameras that we argue about !!
--
Keith-C
 
Pretty darned impressive work! Thanks for sharing these wonderful images!

--
Busch

Take the scenic route! Life is too short to do otherwise.

http://www.pbase.com/busch
 
As usual, you produce stunning stuff. Your tracking/guiding is very good. Is your rig good enough to track by itself for 5 minutes?
--
Steve W
weather photos: http://home.comcast.net/~scwest/atmo/
 
Very nice. I always enjoy astrophotography and all the wonders it reveals. Looking at all those "bright little lights" in what are very small segments of the sky in each photo, I think that one can't help but wonder what other life is out there?

Too bad you can't get enough magnification to show whatever starships might be out there as well. But even Hubbell can't do that. :)

Thanks for the illuminating post.

--
Mark Van Bergh
 
at looking at some pretty impressive photos on here and moving on without the courtesy of a comment or thank you. These are simply too amazing for me to do that. Astronomical photography is a field that has tweaked my interest and your results are feeding my curiousity. I know photography can be an expensive hobby. I expect astronomy can be an expensive hobby. Astronomical photography surely must be astronomically expensive but, I sense myself being draw into this "black hole". Thanks for sharing the results of your expertise, truly fascinating.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top