D60, D80, D90 - image quality?

I agree with His words (100%) . . . .

"Firstly, there are about a hundred threads regarding the image quality of these cameras".

"Secondly, The answers will be totally subjective. Based on personal preferences and sample variations".

"You will get about a thousand different responses, none of which will be conclusive".
--
Stan
--------------
http://ssnet.cz/photo.html
 
"Firstly, there are about a hundred threads regarding the image
quality of these cameras".
Maybe. But if only unique threads were allowed, you could shut down this forum. It's all repetition of about 20 classic thread topics.
"Secondly, The answers will be totally subjective. Based on personal
preferences and sample variations".
Nope. PerL, for example, was friendly enough to post a real comparison. Extremely helpful, and highly conclusive. Much better than "my camera takes nice pics".
"You will get about a thousand different responses, none of which
will be conclusive".
It's been quite conclusive, to this point.

BG
 
and don't mind the extra weight (which really isn't that much).
The D300's more robust build, along with its weather sealing and
dust removal system make it an excellent camera for damp, dusty
and otherwise hostile environments.

--
When a hammer is your only tool, all problems begin to look like nails.
 
That would save time...
Basil G has a D300.
André
 
fact that he already had a D300. That is what happens when I read
and post while in a weakened state (sober).

--
When a hammer is your only tool, all problems begin to look like nails.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top