Not sure yet about my A300

It seems that DSLR's are better at high ISO, but at least the
configuration I have today requires that higher ISO, so it's a wash.
A few more days and I will probably order the 18-250 and all will be
well.
the lens speed issue - it's no faster than the kit lens throughout the same range as the kit lens. I've ordered the 18-250, but not for it's speed - more for it's IQ and versatility compared to the kit lens.

--
-Jerry
Sony V1 and H5 - Still learning...

'The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.'
-- Dorothea Lange

http://www.pbase.com/icicle50/root

 
Even at a ballgame today in full sun, I was getting 1/250 at ISO 100.
So part of the issue may be the kit lens is actually slower than my
H5.
What aperture were you using? In full sun with ISO 100 and 1/250 that would indicate about f11. Why not use f5.6 and 1/1000 or f8 and 1/500?

--
Henry Richardson
http://www.bakubo.com
 
Thanks for the info Thirsty.

Now I am trying to decide Canon 40D or the A300.

I will probably stick with what I have due to size, price, and image stable body.

I took some pics at ball yesterday with the hopped up settings and they look pretty good.

The 18-250 will help too.

Thanks,

Duck44
 
Hi Henry,

I was using f8 to get some depth of field since the action was moving. I had to do this with the H5 due to focus speed. Still at f8 was not getting 1/500.

With the improved focus and tracking of the A300, do you think f5.6 is ok for sports?

Thanks,

Duck44
 
to test for that, take the camera and go back to the store and ask to try a different, better lens. They should let you do that. And/or, use your lens on their body.

also, the kit lens isn't sharp until F8 or F11

i find when shooting animals that taking a bust of photos helps, since they can move their body parts unexpectedly and fast!

check the user reviews out:
http://www.dyxum.com/reviews/lenses/reviews.asp?IDLens=204
 
Bought it at Amazon, so can't go to the store, but may try at a Ritz.

THanks,

Duck44
 
Ok,

I made my decision to stick with the A300. Some softball shots in full son really convinced me. The focus on moving objects is awesome. The D40 might be better, but I didn't want to have to bodybuild to carry it.

Opened the wireless flash (pretty cool) and spare battery.

Went online to Sony to save my $100 (Sony card) on the SAL 18-250. And guess what - BACKORDERED. I did order the hard screen protector as well.

Now for a reasonably priced 50mm on ebay.

Such is life - I can't wait for it to arrive.

Thanks for all the feedback

Duck44
 
36 flash (or KM 3600 on ebay). I have three now - two KM and one Sony bought last week (about $100 - new). The wireless feature is one of the best aspects of the KM/Sony dSLRS and it is really enhanced with a couple of flashes.
 
I didn't read the other replies but to me the shots look good all and all ! Even the first shot with the deer the deer is not bad.. I think low light and wide aperture and low contrast do to the lighting is the cause.. Other shots look good to me.. Nice and sharp.. I think that camera and lens is a keeper if you can afford to do so.. I test out things the same as you in trying to keep everything I don't absolutely need packed in case of return.. But for me it's more of a guilt trip in my head knowing I really should not have spent the money I didn't have for another camera or something I wanted.. If you have the $$$ try and just enjoy it.. George
--
George
5D
Gear is listed under my Profile.
 
Thanks for the tip
 
Thanks George.

It's a keeper now. Ogled the 40D today. Wow is it fast, but just too big for me.

Can't wait for the 18-250 to show up.

Duck44
 
It's a definite adjustment coming over from a superzoom, but I think you're getting the hang of it. Depending on how you handle the DSLR, and how much you understand about the differences in the handling and processing, it can even seem initially disappointing. However, having spent some time now with my A300 and lots of shots under my belt with all of my lenses, I can tell you as one of the first H5 users in Dpreview, and one of the most avid fans and supporters of that camera through my 2 great years with it, that the A300 is better than the H5 in some areas, and can do other things the H5 or any prosumer simply cannot.

I think the 18-250 is going to help you overall - as Jerry mentioned above, it isn't going to solve your light sensitivity issues, but it will give you a more familiar range and flexibility that you were used to on the H5, with that big zoom.

Your issues with the shutter speeds are lens related, not camera related. The H5 has a maximum aperture of F2.8 at 36mm - whereas the kit lens is beginning a little wider but still only at F3.5 - which is two f-stops less sensitive. So the same lighting and same ISO would require a slower shutter speed to get the same metering - 1/500 on the H5 versus 1/250 on the A300, for example. As you use more telephoto, the H5 could zoom all the way to 420mm with a maximum aperture of F3.7. With the kit lens, you're at F5.6 even when you're at 105mm equivalent...if you were to zoom the H5 to roughly that same focal distance, you'd be in the range of F3.2 or so. Now you're a very significant 2 full stops of sensitivity different - a 1/500 on the H5 versus a 1/125 or even 1/60 on the A300.

But - that's where the ISO factor comes into play. You can get one of those stops back by increasing the ISO. The H5 remains usable at ISO400, but noticeably grainy...while the A300 can shoot in ISO400 if properly metered and be basically free of noise. At ISO800, the H5 was getting ugly - noisy, lots of smearing, and bad color fadeout...usable in a pinch, but not for everything. The A300 is still shooting great detail and perfect color at ISO800, only just introducing some minor noise. At ISO1600, still usable on the A300 - depending on your tolerance of noise and noise removal techniques...detail and color remain good.

As mentioned above also, the ability to swap lenses as your needs grow is a big advantage with a DSLR. As long as you're willing to spend the money and deal with the bulk, the DSLR's abilities are expandable with better lenses. Lay your hands on an F2.8 constant zoom, and you're at the same or better sensitivity as the H5 with significantly better optical quality and sensor size to preserve greater detail. Slap on a low light lens like an F1.4 or F1.7 prime, and you can shoot handheld snapshots at midnight at high ISO, or turn a grey post-dusk scene into bright-as-daylight and get all the fast shutter you need to freeze action when the H5 would be shooting shutters measured in seconds.

It just takes a bit of learning and adjusting...and choosing the right lens for your shooting. I think the 18-250 is a great all around lens that you should enjoy. Finding a cheap 50mm F1.7 is almost a rite-of-passage for Alpha buyers, and I heartily recommend tracking one down while they're cheap. The low light abilities of this lens combined with the high ISO is a blissful revelation.

As mentioned, avoid Auto mode like the plague if you can. P mode is nearly identical to A mode - so if you're still learning or uncomfortable with forgetting to make changes in A or S mode on the fly, use P mode. It will save your custom settings, and still let the camera choose WB, ISO, aperture, and shutter - but give you the ability to spin the control wheel to override the aperture/shutter combination to achieve a desired depth of field or faster shutter speed.

A and S mode are useful when you want to lock one of those parameters for a particular type of shooting, and M mode when you've got the confidence to set both for your needs. Even the scene modes are useful, as they allow you to change some of the preset parameters like focus mode, metering mode, WB mode, focus area, metering area, ISO, etc to fine tune it to your preferences.

Have fun, shoot alot, practice alot and get used to the sweet spots and handling of the A300 - and you should end up falling in love with it.

Hope that helps!

--
Justin
galleries: http://www.pbase.com/zackiedawg
 
I have had my A300 about 3 weeks now, maybe 150 shots.

My wife has had her H-5 a little over 1yr and realy likes it.

Here is a A300 shot, set on auto, kit 18/70 lens..

 
Thanks zackiedawg,

Although the ship may have left the harbor on the cheap 50mm. ebay is lucky to be under $100.

I am shooting almost consistently in A mode now. Although, I have to remember to adjust A when I zoom to avoid the lens full open. I am still not comfortable shooting f8 in all occassions. And especially for flowers want less dof. I will learn.

Now if Sony will just give me a ship date on the 18-250.

Thanks again,

Duck44
 
Check good camera stores a bit off the beaten track. My son found one for me in Vancouver (he lives there) and I had it here in Newfoundland in 3 days via Canada Post Express. This was their last unit, though. I don't even have my A350 body yet, so can't try it out. I did have to pay full retail for it ($600 here), but better than getting $50 off and waiting until late August, which is when Sony is expecting new shipments.
--
-Jerry
Sony V1 and H5 - Still learning...

'The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.'
-- Dorothea Lange

http://www.pbase.com/icicle50/root

 
Ouch - late august, they gave me no estimate. My savings thru sony is $120 due to the credit card and a discover rebate.

But August!!!
 
It took me less than 15 seconds to achieve these results as referenced in one of my previous posts to you on another thread. I guarantee you could not have this lattitude or pick up this much detail from the H5.

And on the deer, had you used action setting ( helps with blur when dof not important but deer was further away anywho ), added two dashes of light ( 2 turns to the right of the exposure comp. button due to darker scene with all the foilage, and used cz glass - just think of the possibilities.

Now stop over thinking and happy shooting with your A300. :)



And may have over done the light but oh well.



--
Bobby
 
Again, a little exagerated but you can pick how much. On so much one can do with darker moving object not in good light.



--
Bobby
 
Understood Bob, I do pp a lot on my pics as well.

Just want to be sure the "clay" is better "clay".
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top