Gearóid Ó Laoi Garry Lee
Veteran Member
So why the assumption by everyone?
Mind you I hope there will be.
Mind you I hope there will be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow.. that's cryptic! Did he developeindigestion just as he was answering you or is there something behind that 'smile'?I also asked if 14-35 would be the kit lens for the new pro body,
they said with a smile that it wasn't impossible...
He was lying.Wow.. that's cryptic! Did he developeindigestion just as he wasI also asked if 14-35 would be the kit lens for the new pro body,
they said with a smile that it wasn't impossible...
answering you or is there something behind that 'smile'?
The Olympus rep here in Croatia told me the lens will be 2000-2500 euros.Why can't the 14-35 be the 'kit lens'?
That's a bit strong isn't it?He was lying.
I don't see it... they have 3 'tiers'.. completed 'tiers' of zooms at present. How can they squeeze any more kit lenses in there?The Olympus rep here in Croatia told me the lens will be 2000-2500Why can't the 14-35 be the 'kit lens'?
euros.
But he also said they were developing new kit lenses.
Re: the 14-35 being the 'kit lens' for the E-3: I'd always thought that that was why the 14-35 was held back!he said that it "wasn't impossible"...
Oops. There was supposed to be a question mark at the end, not a fullstop.That's a bit strong isn't it?He was lying.
Not in me, you don't.I see hunger for primes, not zooms..
Do you? I mean, really?I see the zoom range
completed! I see 14-xxmm fulfilled in every tier!
Oops. There was supposed to be a question mark at the end, not aThat's a bit strong isn't it?He was lying.
fullstop.
Not in me, you don't.I see hunger for primes, not zooms..
Do you? I mean, really?I see the zoom range
completed! I see 14-xxmm fulfilled in every tier!
Nope because top pro range isTop Pro doesn't have anything like that. 14-35 is too short.
It would'nt be logical at all IMHOI can easily see something similar (17-54, 2.0-2.8, let's say)
fitting into Olympus's Top Pro tier.
Over the past 47 years only one camera manufacturer, Canon, have successfully competed with Nikon for a substantial share of the pro SLR market, and Canon were an also ran until the EOS-1. Topcon, Pentax, Minolta and Olympus all failed despite have making nice professional level cameras backed by a complete system of accessories. It takes more than pro level hardware, it takes credence, and as of yet Olympus does not have it. In the nearly three years since the introduction of the E-1, Olympus have lost any momentum they may have had attracting large numbers of professionals.Will be the E-3 be marketed (and priced) to compete with the likes
of the D200, orrrrrr (and this is a big "or"), will it be released
as a fully Pro camera with all of the features that one would
expect of such a model (and price of course)?