Read carefully his thread. You will note he uses the XDP in the
photos. XDP is not the same as 1000nm as it uses just 5%-10%
of the IR compared to pure IR filters and it's just about 900nm.
The rest is visible red. The effect is the same as getting a
RM90, reduce the IR to 10% pass thru and putting a red
filter.
z
photos. XDP is not the same as 1000nm as it uses just 5%-10%
of the IR compared to pure IR filters and it's just about 900nm.
The rest is visible red. The effect is the same as getting a
RM90, reduce the IR to 10% pass thru and putting a red
filter.
z
David
--Where's the post where Andy shows images taken with theXNite-1000nm – I wanted to have a stronger IR filter than my R72,
to get really high contrast B&W infrared images. Many people here
use the B&W 87C (830nm), but after seeing the skies Andy gets with
the 1000nm filter I had to go and get one of those instead!!!
1000nm filter?
What he used is the XDP... which is close to 1000nm (maybe
around 900nm) but only allowing about 10% of IR light
compared to a pure 1000nm (the rest being visible red). I
hope Andy can share his photos taken with the pure 1000nm.
If he has done so, pls. point me to the thread.
In your shutter speed table. You listed 1000nm as producing
only 1/5 sec. What aperture is that? My RG1000 can take
between 1/20 - 1/60 sec at F2.0. I guess it depends on the
thickeness of the glass used. The maxmax 1000nm is 2mm
thick, anyone got any idea what is the thickness of the
Heliopan RG1000? The thickness can determine the
brightness fo the image and this is important since one is
already getting very slow shutter in the stronger filter.
z
http://www.pbase.com/dcm74133