Filter Use

Cory Waltz

Well-known member
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Location
Huntsville, AL, US
I've been toying with the idea of getting a Cokin P filter holder, and a couple of HiTech GNDs. For those of you who've used the Cokin system, how did you incorporate a circular polarizer? Did you use the Cokin one, or did you just use a round circular polarizer and then attach the Cokin holder? If the latter, is getting the circular polarizer set correctly a problem?

Thanks for the help.
 
I've been toying with the idea of getting a Cokin P filter holder,
and a couple of HiTech GNDs. For those of you who've used the
Cokin system, how did you incorporate a circular polarizer? Did
you use the Cokin one, or did you just use a round circular
polarizer and then attach the Cokin holder? If the latter, is
getting the circular polarizer set correctly a problem?

Thanks for the help.
 
I thought at least 1 person would have responded by now. Maybe I should have said something about incorrect focus in the title... or that the 10D is discontinued.
I've been toying with the idea of getting a Cokin P filter holder,
and a couple of HiTech GNDs. For those of you who've used the
Cokin system, how did you incorporate a circular polarizer? Did
you use the Cokin one, or did you just use a round circular
polarizer and then attach the Cokin holder? If the latter, is
getting the circular polarizer set correctly a problem?

Thanks for the help.
 
Now I can't remember what the question was LOL--OH--yes, I use Cokin P. I actually do use the Cokin circular polarizer. I also recently purchased the blue/gold polarizer also for different reasons. I believe there might be another circular polarizer--perhaps Singh Ray (which is MUCH more expensive) but the Cokin one does a good job.

I'm not sure what you are asking--do you mean use a circular polarizer and then try to fit the Cokin on top of that? I'm not sure if you know how it attaches, so here is a link so you can see it
http://www.geocities.com/cokinfiltersystem/howitworks.htm

You must attach the lens adaptor ring to your lens/protective filter and then the holder slides down over that. The filters slide into the slots in the holder. If you look closely, you will see that there is a thin slot very close to the lens--this is where the polarizer fits--and then it turns within this slot--or you can turn the whole holder--just as a regular circular polarizer works. No difference.

The reason I use Cokin is because I have 9 lenses and am able to use a filter (I have NDs and ND grads, polarizers, IR filter [actually gel that fits in a gel holder and fits in filter holder altho' there is now an 89B filter that works instead of having to buy a gel] with all my lenses simply by having an inexpensive adaptor ring for each lens. When I was shooting with an Oly E10, Jaja (a 'used to be' contributor to this forum--but who has quite an interesting sie of his own in Belgium http://www.belgiumdigital.com/ ) got me interested in the Cokin setup and I've been using it for a number of years--simply adding lens adaptor rings as I've bought and sold lenses and cameras.

Hope this helps.

Diane
--
Diane B
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
 
I only use a UV filter to cut glare... And to protect the main lens.

I do not use any other specialty filters anymore as I can reproduce anything I want in Photoshop. More flexibility that way with the original image.
Vaughn
Now I can't remember what the question was LOL--OH--yes, I use
Cokin P. I actually do use the Cokin circular polarizer. I also
recently purchased the blue/gold polarizer also for different
reasons. I believe there might be another circular
polarizer--perhaps Singh Ray (which is MUCH more expensive) but the
Cokin one does a good job.

I'm not sure what you are asking--do you mean use a circular
polarizer and then try to fit the Cokin on top of that? I'm not
sure if you know how it attaches, so here is a link so you can see
it
http://www.geocities.com/cokinfiltersystem/howitworks.htm
You must attach the lens adaptor ring to your lens/protective
filter and then the holder slides down over that. The filters
slide into the slots in the holder. If you look closely, you will
see that there is a thin slot very close to the lens--this is where
the polarizer fits--and then it turns within this slot--or you can
turn the whole holder--just as a regular circular polarizer works.
No difference.

The reason I use Cokin is because I have 9 lenses and am able to
use a filter (I have NDs and ND grads, polarizers, IR filter
[actually gel that fits in a gel holder and fits in filter holder
altho' there is now an 89B filter that works instead of having to
buy a gel] with all my lenses simply by having an inexpensive
adaptor ring for each lens. When I was shooting with an Oly E10,
Jaja (a 'used to be' contributor to this forum--but who has quite
an interesting sie of his own in Belgium
http://www.belgiumdigital.com/ ) got me interested in the Cokin
setup and I've been using it for a number of years--simply adding
lens adaptor rings as I've bought and sold lenses and cameras.

Hope this helps.

Diane
--
Diane B
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
--
Vaughn T. Winfree
Friends Don't Let Friends Shoot Film :)

pBase supporter http://www.pBase.com/vaughn
 
I only use a UV filter to cut glare... And to protect the main lens.
I do not use any other specialty filters anymore as I can reproduce
anything I want in Photoshop. More flexibility that way with the
original image.
I'm a long time PS user and am pretty good--you can't reproduce the results from a polarizer very easily--you can layer mask/ correct, but if you don't get some clouds and some 'interesting' sky to begin with, you can't bring that up in PS. You can replace the sky, 'recreate' the sky--but a polarizer helps with both sky---and OF COURSE--it eliminates 'glare' from metal, water, etc. You also can't reproduce REAL IR----and you can't 'soften/silken' water without using an ND filter in the case of not being able to drop the shutter speed sufficiently.

Diane
--
Diane B
black and white lover, but color has seduced me
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
 
I agree with your points on not being able to reproduce the polarizer and see the benefits to using the ND, but from what I know of the Cokin system the filters are plastic right? How does that compare quality wise (optically) to a $100+ glass circular filter? Would it affect the image quality much?
I only use a UV filter to cut glare... And to protect the main lens.
I do not use any other specialty filters anymore as I can reproduce
anything I want in Photoshop. More flexibility that way with the
original image.
I'm a long time PS user and am pretty good--you can't reproduce the
results from a polarizer very easily--you can layer mask/ correct,
but if you don't get some clouds and some 'interesting' sky to
begin with, you can't bring that up in PS. You can replace the
sky, 'recreate' the sky--but a polarizer helps with both sky---and
OF COURSE--it eliminates 'glare' from metal, water, etc. You also
can't reproduce REAL IR----and you can't 'soften/silken' water
without using an ND filter in the case of not being able to drop
the shutter speed sufficiently.

Diane
--
Diane B
black and white lover, but color has seduced me
http://www.pbase.com/picnic/galleries
--
C.Ayers
http://www.pbase.com/prob1t
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top