Bob, a couple of points:
Firstly, I'll echo the sentiment of another poster in saying there's often a case for staying with larger pixel dimensions. The reasons are that --
1. you have greater potential for cropping/enlarging details later on (it's rare to be able to fill the frame accurately or neatly with each subject, especially if you have to shoot in a hurry), and
2. sooner or later you'll want to print that occasional, special, subject at a much larger size, frame it and hang it on your wall.
FWIW if you have to compromise in order to conserve storage space, general opinion is that the F717's Standard compression loses so little in quality, relative to Fine mode, that you should preferably drop to Standard ahead of sacrificing pixel count. This would give you about 95 full 5 Mp images on a 128 MB card, as against 81 images (nominal) for 2048 x 1536 Fine.
Secondly, ignoring the above for the moment, then what you need in order to calculate minimum image pixel dimensions is to look at your worst-case print dimension and multiply it by the desired resolution:
1. As I guess you're aware, the F717's normal pixel dimensions (e.g. 2560 x 1920) have an "aspect ratio" (width:height) of 4:3. A 6" x 4" print has an aspect ratio of 3:2, so you'll have to set the print width to 6" and allow the surplus to bleed off the top and bottom edges of the print, or else crop them. (You can shoot in 3:2 mode to avoid having to think about cropping later but, strangely, with Sony you don't reclaim any storage space by doing this.)
2. You should aim for about 240 pixels per inch (ppi) in your print, at whatever physical size you might want that to be. You can let it fall to 200 or even 180 ppi without losing much, but it makes sense to keep the resolution up a bit if the pixels are available.
3. That means that for preferred print quality your image should be (6 x 240 pixels) wide, i.e. 1440 ppi. The nearest standard output from the F717 that meets or exceeds this is 2048 x 1536 pixels. You can see that this would give you a print resolution of 2048/6 = 341.3 ppi which is more than adequate.
4. If you wanted to drop to the next available setting (1280 x 960 pixels), the resolution becomes 1280/6 = 213.3 ppi. In practice this would still give you excellent prints; in fact for most subjects you'd be very hard pressed indeed to pick the difference. The higher figure would only have an advantage via a high resolution printer if your image had lots of ultra fine detail, such as a ship's rigging, animal hair, etc.
Mike
Melbourne
OK. That said, would I want to use this format when taking lots of
vacation photos knowing that I would want 4X6 prints as the end
result? Or would there be a wiser way to go? Bottom line---I want
to get more than (for example) 51 "Fine"images on a 128mb mem.
stick.