Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a bit of an overstatement. All of the reviews of the 828 have been positive (even Phil gave it a Recommended). The vast majority of 828 owners are happy with their cameras. Everyday excellent 828 shots are posted here. How does this translate to the 828 being a shi* or cra*?The problem with this forum and with most of the world is that
there are too many people willing to defend just about any cra* out
there and the reason makers like Sony get away with the shi* they
just pulled.
If its not true and theres no reason to believe it is he's just spreading misinformation.If what this guy says is true, then Kudos to the store and for the
guy for posting it here and if not, what's the big deal?
Its ok to spread a unfounded rumor but you have a problem with satisifed 828 owners expressing their opinion?The big deal however to me is again the people that not only BUY
the junk Sony just made but they try to defend the product, try to
make workarounds and try to advice others to do the same.
If you can't find a camera that you would be happy with from all the possibilites available at this time then you will never find a "good" camera.Now, what you guys buy is none of my business but when it means
that I cannot buy a good camera because a defective one is being
made AND sold in decent numbers, then it concerns me.
Well this one certainly sounds genuine.Georgi,
I've seen too many of these ridiculous "the salesman said" posts to
give them any credibility.
Phil wanted (and almost did) give the 828 an "Average" rating if you read the review, in fact he gave it a recommended only to Pro users for newbies he gave it an "average"This is a bit of an overstatement. All of the reviews of the 828The problem with this forum and with most of the world is that
there are too many people willing to defend just about any cra* out
there and the reason makers like Sony get away with the shi* they
just pulled.
have been positive (even Phil gave it a Recommended). The vast
majority of 828 owners are happy with their cameras. Everyday
excellent 828 shots are posted here. How does this translate to the
828 being a shi* or cra*?
Not at all but the Sony police apparently do not like dissatisfied 828 owners expressing their opinion!If its not true and theres no reason to believe it is he's justIf what this guy says is true, then Kudos to the store and for the
guy for posting it here and if not, what's the big deal?
spreading misinformation.
Its ok to spread a unfounded rumor but you have a problem withThe big deal however to me is again the people that not only BUY
the junk Sony just made but they try to defend the product, try to
make workarounds and try to advice others to do the same.
satisifed 828 owners expressing their opinion?
OH I think if he looks hard enough he will, it's just unfortunate that he got sucked into the Sony marketing hype for a camera that has not lived up to its advance billing.If you can't find a camera that you would be happy with from allNow, what you guys buy is none of my business but when it means
that I cannot buy a good camera because a defective one is being
made AND sold in decent numbers, then it concerns me.
the possibilites available at this time then you will never find a
"good" camera.
--Harry
--
http://www.pbase.com/hpb
'We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act
of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen,
the music we have heard, the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams
I might be wrong but doesn't Sony have contracts with most of the major players for CCD's or sensors?erikkfi wrote:
I guess these highly experienced camera sales people simply forgot
that Sony has been making the best professional video cameras for
25 years. But then they don't count do they?
He still gave it a "Recommended" and all of the other reviews have been positive as well of the experience of the vast majority of 828 owners (at least from what I see here).Phil wanted (and almost did) give the 828 an "Average" rating if
you read the review, in fact he gave it a recommended only to Pro
users for newbies he gave it an "average"
I'm shocked that a company "hyped" a new product. Egads can you imagine what would happen if other companies did the same thing? ;-)OH I think if he looks hard enough he will, it's just unfortunate
that he got sucked into the Sony marketing hype for a camera that
has not lived up to its advance billing.
I guess you are an expert in people behaviour... but how about this point of view -The problem with this forum and with most of the world is that
there are too many people willing to defend just about any cra* out
there and the reason makers like Sony get away with the shi* they
just pulled.
I really have no curiousity about it. If there's a real store taking that position it may be interesting if we knew some specifics. Until such time its a unsubstantiated rumor.Although I did not name the store specifically, I named the town,
the store's size, and his position. I will not put his name or the
name of the store out there until I clear that with him. If you had
one iota of real curiosity, you would call up the Swiss electronic
telephone book and find it. It is not that hard. Since they are not
open on Monday, I will call him on Tuesday and get permission and
ask him to put up his images.
Never called you a trollThe basic point is that such information is not really pertinent
for the anecdote related. Nevertheless, a couple of people attested
to the fact that I am not a troll nor do I spend my time spreading
rumors.
Again I never called you a troll. What "yowling" where you referring to?Finally, what surprises me is that you don't recognize that someone
publishing under his own name with a valid e-mail address and
responding to the yowling here is quite different than your usual
troll.
Ok folks,
Just got a mail from a good friend, he went to his friendly local
camera store to check out the 828 and they told him that they
refuse to sell it. After their in-house tests they came to the
conclusion that the quality is just terrible.
--Its not just that technoloy is changing, but the business around it
is as well. Doubt me? Check the Kodak news on the home page.
Nate
Ok folks,
Just got a mail from a good friend, he went to his friendly local
camera store to check out the 828 and they told him that they
refuse to sell it. After their in-house tests they came to the
conclusion that the quality is just terrible.
--
I've no idea why these pathetic tossers insist on posting up such feeble trolls ('a friend told me', indeed!), but why oh why do people respond en masse every time?!Just got a mail from a good friend, he went to his friendly local
camera store to check out the 828 and they told him that they
refuse to sell it. After their in-house tests they came to the
conclusion that the quality is just terrible.