Over and out

That's cool, and I understand where you're coming from. I just wish you had directed your replies to what other people have said in other threads to THOSE OTHER PEOPLE instead of in a reply to me.

-Todd
There I said it. I've been very quite about my feelings but can't
take it anymore. So flame away... (I can already predict who's
going to flame this post).

Hendra.
Waaaugh...the 828 has issues and people won't stop complaining, so
I'm taking my ball and going home!

Man alive, people, get a grip. I want Sony to address the 828's
issues with a fix if possible, and the only way they will do that
is if enough people complain! Complaining isn't always a bad
thing, even if it hurts your feelings a little to see your brand
new $1000 camera get bashed for a while.

Don't defend the 828 to the point that you're willing to ignore or
accept it's flaws at the expense of possibly getting them fixed.
Don't think it can happen? It happened before when Sony
reluctantly recalled the F707 to fix the BFS that was discovered
and posted about in this very forum.

If there is any hope at all that Sony might be able to minimize
these issues with a fix, then people complaining in this forum is
the best chance 828 owners have of that happening.

-Todd
 
The complaints aren't organized. THey are just one post bashes of the 828. If the were REALLY organized, they would be confined to a few threads...not (now) 10 threads on the first page, half of which only have one or two replies..
-Todd
The problem isn't the criticsm.....its that people feel the need to
make sure EVERYONE HERE KNOWS that THEY aren't buying the camera.
So the make their own thread, and CLUTTER UP the forum.

BTW--I have dual citizenship here at STF AND CTF. BUt this need to
drown the forum in negativity is really out of hand....
Man alive, people, get a grip. I want Sony to address the 828's
issues with a fix if possible, and the only way they will do that
is if enough people complain! Complaining isn't always a bad
thing, even if it hurts your feelings a little to see your brand
new $1000 camera get bashed for a while.

Don't defend the 828 to the point that you're willing to ignore or
accept it's flaws at the expense of possibly getting them fixed.
Don't think it can happen? It happened before when Sony
reluctantly recalled the F707 to fix the BFS that was discovered
and posted about in this very forum.

If there is any hope at all that Sony might be able to minimize
these issues with a fix, then people complaining in this forum is
the best chance 828 owners have of that happening.

-Todd
You are accomplished enough you might never need the help, support,
and knowledge base this forum has in the past provided in
abundance, but please consider the huge gap you and folks like you,
with such talent and ability, will leave.

I know you're not getting anything now but a hard way to go, but
you might not see the considerable amount you give, or how much it
is appreciated. I know you provide it out of the kindness of your
heart and good nature, and you don't deserve to have to fight every
day.

But

If all reason and moderation vanish, the house that you and several
others built will dissolve into a breeding ground for unchallenged
misinformation and negativity.

I don't think the churn will last; I'm hoping the good stays
around, weathers out the storm, and continues to lead by
unimpeachable example.
--
'One more time we hear.......the images look great, just so long as
you don't look at them'

Justin Blethrow on the rabid defense of a certain 'other' camera.

http://www.pbase.com/daemeon
--

'One more time we hear.......the images look great, just so long as you don't look at them'

Justin Blethrow on the rabid defense of a certain 'other' camera.

http://www.pbase.com/daemeon
 
We canonites are not all bad. :)
There I said it. I've been very quite about my feelings but can't
take it anymore. So flame away... (I can already predict who's
going to flame this post).

Hendra.
Waaaugh...the 828 has issues and people won't stop complaining, so
I'm taking my ball and going home!

Man alive, people, get a grip. I want Sony to address the 828's
issues with a fix if possible, and the only way they will do that
is if enough people complain! Complaining isn't always a bad
thing, even if it hurts your feelings a little to see your brand
new $1000 camera get bashed for a while.

Don't defend the 828 to the point that you're willing to ignore or
accept it's flaws at the expense of possibly getting them fixed.
Don't think it can happen? It happened before when Sony
reluctantly recalled the F707 to fix the BFS that was discovered
and posted about in this very forum.

If there is any hope at all that Sony might be able to minimize
these issues with a fix, then people complaining in this forum is
the best chance 828 owners have of that happening.

-Todd
--

'One more time we hear.......the images look great, just so long as you don't look at them'

Justin Blethrow on the rabid defense of a certain 'other' camera.

http://www.pbase.com/daemeon
 
Todd,

It depends on what you're posting. I'm disappointed in the 828 myself but I also recognize the positives of the camera. The hysterical and incessant bashing only hurts the creditability of the basher.

It bothers me when I see STF regulars and newbies saying they are leaving the forum because of the rampant negativity. Companies' overriding concern is their profits. I don't see Sony being concerned by STF threads bashing the 828 by folks who were unlikely to buy the 828 in the first place. Real and potential customers contacting them would have an impact.

Using STF to get letters to Sony would be constructive. The endless bashing and camera wars only make the forum a place one wants to be away from. Most of the bashing posts that I've seen have come from folsk who have never used an 828. I'm not Sony but they don't influence me at all beyond being annoying.

Finally if you want to use the collective 828 experience then you will have to admit that most of the 828 posts by 828 users have been positive.

--
http://www.pbase.com/hpb

'We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams
 
Matt,

As you know, I'm trying to stay out of the "debate" threads. But, I find that I'm limited to about 20% of the STF :-( The other 80% of the threads are too volatile to my digestive system.

Maybe Phil should create an 828 forum. At least STF could return to some semblence of normalcy.

I respect and fully understand your decision. I hope you decide to return, when you're ready.

Good fortune and good shooting,
Steve
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
--
http://www.pbase.com/slo2k
'The question is not what you look at, but what you see' - Thoreau
 
Matthew, my take on it is that the greatest amount of damage is being done by irresponsible postings from three specific mind-sets:

1) Those with the misfortune to have acquired below-par cameras (they don't have to be total lemons to qualify) and who won't give the time of day to those whose equal but opposite fortune has landed them a good copy.

2) Those who own cameras that perform very well and who won't give the time of day to those with legitimate problems.

3) Those who assume that a casual but general sounding reference to either "side" of an issue is intended (note, intended ) as a categorical, unbending assertion that all copies of the camera behave either this way or that way.

There's a further trait here that operates as a corollary of mind-set (3), and it's one that insists on ascribing motive or intent to what is, if read literally, a merely narrative word, phrase or sentence, extending to the very raison d'être for an entire given post.

There is some (if limited) excuse for instances of the first scenario, but only through allowing for the inevitable dismay at having spent a lot of money on faulty equipment, and due recognition of the emotions that this reality arouses.

There is NO excuse for either of the other positions. These three cancers of denial and intolerance are precisely what we saw with Sony BFS, DLSS and HAF errors, and in the Canon camp with 10D front/back AF problems which, though far from universal, were widespread enough to prove they weren't happening in people's imaginations -- individual or collective.

One would have thought that the STF might have learned from the 10D focus epic. It was by far the worst display of abusive intolerance over a real camera problem that I can recall seeing in the equipment brand forums.

Until the F828 came along.

By way of only one example, I see many responses to the recent thread started by Todd Meyers as a very sad commentary of this forum, driven almost entirely by (2) and (3), above. At its worst, it sprouted a sub-thread attacking somebody else that was illogical, accusatory, and downright ugly beyond belief.

Todd did his darnedest, over and over again, to indicate how he'd wanted to love the F828, and had tried to give it every possible chance -- on the available evidence -- to prove itself a worthy contender for his next purchase. He finally turned away from it only with reluctance and regret.

Most importantly, NOWHERE did he go out of his way to brand all F828s as rubbish, or as anything else. All he really did was offer the contention that the F828 in its current state of development represents too much of a gamble to justify his custom. Perhaps his fatal mistake was to include the words "provocative" and "advice" in his opening subject line when he intended nothing more than a personal narrative. An unwisely chosen initial subject line can ruin the best-intentioned thread, because that's what every new arrival sees first.

For anyone to have got on Todd's case as an F828 "trasher" on the basis of his sentiments in that thread -- and many did -- was a pitiful indictment of this forum. Mindless intolerance, cynicism at its worst, discarded logic... it was all there.

Ulysses has an uncanny ability to pour oil on troubled waters in threads like that without causing secondary offence. I can't pretend to match him there. There's a few heads I really feel like banging together in this current climate, and they're to be found on both sides of the hardware war ("debate" would be an absurd euphemism for the way much of it's being conducted).

Time to ask ourselves, again, what we're here for, what it might have been that used to hallmark the STF as a singularly harmonious forum, what has changed, and why. And to do this while some of its previously unique appeal is left.

Mike
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
 
Steve,

I guess we will just have to start some other threads. Take a few pics post them, etc. I'm so tired of all this silliness.

harry
--
http://www.pbase.com/hpb

'We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams
 
Oh you've got to be kidding. I still really want an 828. I was up all night trying to read German when some website over there posted the first pictures of the 828. I don't think most of the people complaining are people who never were truly interested in the 828 to begin with. Far from it. I think most of them are people who really want the 828 but want it to work properly. It's got a ton of things going for it, but Sony's got to address the problems I think...I hope, anyway.

-Todd
Todd,

It depends on what you're posting. I'm disappointed in the 828
myself but I also recognize the positives of the camera. The
hysterical and incessant bashing only hurts the creditability of
the basher.

It bothers me when I see STF regulars and newbies saying they are
leaving the forum because of the rampant negativity. Companies'
overriding concern is their profits. I don't see Sony being
concerned by STF threads bashing the 828 by folks who were unlikely
to buy the 828 in the first place. Real and potential customers
contacting them would have an impact.

Using STF to get letters to Sony would be constructive. The endless
bashing and camera wars only make the forum a place one wants to be
away from. Most of the bashing posts that I've seen have come from
folsk who have never used an 828. I'm not Sony but they don't
influence me at all beyond being annoying.

Finally if you want to use the collective 828 experience then you
will have to admit that most of the 828 posts by 828 users have
been positive.

--
http://www.pbase.com/hpb

'We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act
of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen,
the music we have heard, the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams
 
Matthew,

I hear you. I mostly hang out at the 300D forum and got sick of them trashing Sony camera. And now, its the STFers that are trashing too. Maybe in a month, everybody will calm down.
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
--
John from Southern California
http://www.pbase.com/johnrweb/favorite
http://www.pbase.com/domdom
F707 and 300D
 
Todd,

I really want an 828 too. Like you I'm not getting one because of the noise and the pf. What we are disagreeing on is how to achieve the end we both want.

I've written a letter to Sony telling them why they lost my sale.

I wasn't saying that you were a "basher" if it came across that way I apologize I was referring to others. I would like to see a bit more perspective in the 828 debate. It has some real strengths and lots of folks will do well with the camera. Its a good camera but it could have been a "champ" if Sony had made some better decisions.

Harry

--
http://www.pbase.com/hpb

'We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved.' Ansel Adams
 
I know we have had our ups and downs but you have always been a class act. Whatever you do please stay true to your photography and follow your passions. Everything will be here when you get back. Take Care..
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
--
rich
'beware the eggplant'
c-7oo, d-51O, DSC-F7O7, 3OOD

'it's not having what you want, it's wanting what you got'
http://www.pbase.com/iceninevt
 
I know we've had our debates that go long and hard, but please don;t leave. This happens in all forums. You should have seen the 300D forums for a while, and still now. MANY people were disappointed with the 300D, and there were plenty of 10D owners knocking the 300D on the 300D forums. There were constant threads of the 300D being a toy, and the crappy dulled down firmware. There were so many "why I chose a 10D instead of a 300D toy" threads.

Give it some time. Things will get back to normal. You offer way too valuable information for you to leave. You benefit a lot of people here including me.

Brian
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
--
The Hunger Site: http://www.thehungersite.com
-------------------------------------
http://adigitaldreamer.com
-------------------------------------
Portfolio at: http://www.skulpt.com
 
Right on Todd

We complain for one reason the camera has issues. We or I do not mean any harm to anyone just got to solve this problem we don't sqeak they don't hear anything. Millions would buy get bad results and spend 2 years thinking they are at fault most will not have the sense to complain thats what drives Microsoft and Intel people think its them not the product .
It's not like people are making this up, the 828 has issues and
it's no secret. Forums like this are what puts pressure on Sony to
make things better. I was here back in the day when all of us F707
owners were seeing BFS (blue flash syndrome) and we thought there
was no hope of a Sony fix because their firmware wasn't upgradeable
by the end user. Well, people start organizing calls to Sony and
posting their serial numbers trying to figure out a
pattern...finally enough bad press here and lo and behold, Sony
offers free shipping both ways for owners to get their firmware
replaced.

Thank goodness for this forum, and for people who complain loudly
and insist on quality. It's your best hope of getting Sony's
attention. And that is a good thing...don't you realize that?

-Todd
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
 
that some on the stf have tied thier personal credibility to the cam they prefer. it might be better to tie it to the photos you take instead. and let the ego....um.....go go.

wm
 
Matthew,

I know this is your thread but it prompted me to re-read Phil's Forum Rules which I hadn't done for awhile after reading some of the posts and replies.

It's a good thing Phil doesn't have time to police all the posts or some of us would probably be in 'forum jail or banned'.

Some of the following excerpts are eye opening to say the least. I hope you'll continue your contributions and also hope you're feeling better after hearing you were home ill recently.

Best regards,

David

****************************************************************************************

Be civil - anyone being abusive, calling names or generally trying to stir up trouble will not be tolerated. If you think someone is wrong it may be because they are new, don't jump on them, think first. If you are repeatedly abusive you will be banned from these forums.

New posters - Before you ask a question please check to see if someone else has asked it before, ask our search engine first.

No Off Topic - Please keep all off-topic messages to the Open Talk forum, that's what it is there for. Off Topic messages may be moved to Open Talk or deleted if posted in one of the main forums, repeated posting of Off Topic messages can lead to a ban.

SPAM - Anyone posting the same (or similar) message more than twice in any of the forums. No single user may start more than three new threads in any fifteen minute period, this helps to limit SPAM and wasteful cross-posting.

Flame / Attacks - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks or self-promoting messages. See first rule.

Trolls - Anyone deliberately antagonizing other forum users by posting 'flame bait' type messages are not welcome. See first rule.

Bashing - Deliberately and repeatedly bashing the same brand, product or company will get you banned. If you have a complaint or comment to make then make it once and make sure you have facts to support it. See first rule.

Harassment - If we receive complaints about users harassing other users either by forum message, email or by other methods you will be banned immediately. If serious enough we will also contact your ISP and report the matter.
 
One thing I noticed is this site is slow so looking in past posts is a daunting task. Phil should divide this up into time chunks by forums. thes go back way to far.
-Todd
The problem isn't the criticsm.....its that people feel the need to
make sure EVERYONE HERE KNOWS that THEY aren't buying the camera.
So the make their own thread, and CLUTTER UP the forum.

BTW--I have dual citizenship here at STF AND CTF. BUt this need to
drown the forum in negativity is really out of hand....
Man alive, people, get a grip. I want Sony to address the 828's
issues with a fix if possible, and the only way they will do that
is if enough people complain! Complaining isn't always a bad
thing, even if it hurts your feelings a little to see your brand
new $1000 camera get bashed for a while.

Don't defend the 828 to the point that you're willing to ignore or
accept it's flaws at the expense of possibly getting them fixed.
Don't think it can happen? It happened before when Sony
reluctantly recalled the F707 to fix the BFS that was discovered
and posted about in this very forum.

If there is any hope at all that Sony might be able to minimize
these issues with a fix, then people complaining in this forum is
the best chance 828 owners have of that happening.

-Todd
You are accomplished enough you might never need the help, support,
and knowledge base this forum has in the past provided in
abundance, but please consider the huge gap you and folks like you,
with such talent and ability, will leave.

I know you're not getting anything now but a hard way to go, but
you might not see the considerable amount you give, or how much it
is appreciated. I know you provide it out of the kindness of your
heart and good nature, and you don't deserve to have to fight every
day.

But

If all reason and moderation vanish, the house that you and several
others built will dissolve into a breeding ground for unchallenged
misinformation and negativity.

I don't think the churn will last; I'm hoping the good stays
around, weathers out the storm, and continues to lead by
unimpeachable example.
--
'One more time we hear.......the images look great, just so long as
you don't look at them'

Justin Blethrow on the rabid defense of a certain 'other' camera.

http://www.pbase.com/daemeon
--
'One more time we hear.......the images look great, just so long as
you don't look at them'

Justin Blethrow on the rabid defense of a certain 'other' camera.

http://www.pbase.com/daemeon
 
I think the talk is neccessary. It's been like this with 7x7 releases too, yes? Maybe not this strong, but back then there was a lot less digicam owners / buyers too. All the negatives should be discussed here too - this is the best feedbaack channel to Sony that we have (check this out: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=7297829 )

The talk is all the more instense, because people don't expect successor product to be worse in any aspects, compared to the one it is following. I think this is a normal and healthy phenomenon. You know better than to take it personally. You SHOULD still enjoy doing with your camera what you do and do exactly what you want to do. That's what I do with mine, the forums don't dictate the way I shoot and what equipment I use.
Besides, you know your input to the forums is much appreciated and respected.
Matthew Cromer wrote:
I've had all I can take.

Every other thread here is someone bashing the 828. Well you've
completely ruined STF and the DP Review forums for me. You win.
I'm out of here. I can't deal with your hateful negativity any
more. It's a camera that has nasty PF in some conditions, and
therefore you decide to destroy a forum and a community over it.
What the h*ll is wrong with you people?

All of you who delight in trashing Sony, the 828, 2/3" sensors, and
anyone who uses an 828, congratulations to you. You beat me.

Phil Askey, if you read this message, the trash needs to be taken out.
--
my favorite work:
http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1
--

 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top