probably not
another system, where everything is not so well covered with the lenses.
waiting for your arguments in the matter on why that's not the case.
You're missing the point entirely. I don't care if Sony has a billion 50mm lenses since this is not what I'm talking about.
Tom, thanks for this note. I travelled to Australia in the 80's (long way from home), and I vividly remember half a dozen wallabies hopping around, in the outskirts of Canberra. I was so amazed that I didn't ever think about taking a picture: those creatures were simply flying... one of my best memories !Obviously to get the true perspective we have to rate the users by a capability index.
I prefer, like most, just to keep buying more and more expensive gear in the pious hope that the next wonder gear will automatically fully replace my lack of skills.
../..
Birding camera? No, but I don't have the skills for birds in flight no matter what camera body I use. But the G100 is fine with the PL 200/2.8 when I need a boost to my lack of skills and maybe catch a wallaby in mid-hop.
To my eyes the fz330 can produce as good photo's as those fz1000 ones in the same good light, 12mp or not. But that doesn't make it as good.it can't do 20mp images
there is no better zoom lens with 25-400mm or 24-600mm range
A7CR - 515 g
50/2.5- 174 g
the same would be with RX10*, RX100*, FZ cameras
It's mostly about the envelope isn't it not what you can do on a sunny day at base iso.
For me M43 is good enough just like 1440p monitors are in comparison to 4k ones. Now 1080p, that's a step too far for me these days
As long as ‘market share” continues to be measured in percentages, or gross sales units or revenue, M43 will continue to be nothing more than a minor player, I can only hope that the OM offerings, going forward, meet or exceed the JIP financial plan, regardless of market share.
Good, but not as good for many reasons.To my eyes the fz330 can produce as good photo's as those fz1000 ones in the same good light, 12mp or not. But that doesn't make it as good.it can't do 20mp images
there is no better zoom lens with 25-400mm or 24-600mm range
A7CR - 515 g
50/2.5- 174 g
the same would be with RX10*, RX100*, FZ cameras
It's mostly about the envelope isn't it not what you can do on a sunny day at base iso.
For me M43 is good enough just like 1440p monitors are in comparison to 4k ones. Now 1080p, that's a step too far for me these days
In general FF is better
Because of 50/1.2 and 200/2
no camera system without limitations
FZ1000II is cheap, compact and light, but you still have something against it?
A camera is a tool, no one makes cameras heavier than they need to be.
FZ1000II - 800gr
no, unless there are other reasons for it
For family and travel photos, 1" is enough: It's lighter, cheaper, and more compact.
www.instagram.com
I don't really disagree with that, but a lot of this for me depends on the type of photography I'm doing. For my studio work, I'm often photographing with post processing in mind, because it's either impossible or impractical to do it "right" in camera. But the point is that I do not enjoy that kind of process - I would rather get it right in camera and only do very light post-processing on my phone later when I can. And for "every day" kind of work? Fuggedaboutit. I don't have the time or desire to go through an extensive RAW-based workflow. I still use JPEG+RAW, but rarely use the RAW files.
I'm sure you know but since you asked, when rotated to the appropriate angle:
Really push what?
To be fair, many of the computational features exist in the Panasonic L-mount bodies. The only thing missing is LiveND/LiveGrad. Those are cool features, but I recently picked-up one of Neweer's True Colour Variable ND+CPL filters. I can use it on almost every single one of my L-mount lenses, as they share the same 67mm diameter. It's pretty impressive.
Well said. I wish Sony would release a follow-up to the RX10 series. I could finally retire my m4/3 stuff and call it a day. Canon has already positioned themselves to severely cannibalise a lot of m4/3 at the wide/normal end with the Powershot V1.it can't do 20mp images
there is no better zoom lens with 25-400mm or 24-600mm range
A7CR - 515 g
50/2.5- 174 g
the same would be with RX10*, RX100*, FZ cameras
Yep, nothing ..... accepted.You’re the one who brought it up!
Your answer to my question appears to be “nothing”. Noted.
Nice to know that you saw them. They can move pretty quickly when they have a notion to do so. Most country Australian towns would have their share of Kangaroos and Wallabies hanging around their more rural outskirts. Especially where there is no broad acre cultivated farming. Kangaroos can breed up a storm since their usual predator (man) started getting his meals from the supermarket.Tom, thanks for this note. I travelled to Australia in the 80's (long way from home), and I vividly remember half a dozen wallabies hopping around, in the outskirts of Canberra. I was so amazed that I didn't ever think about taking a picture: those creatures were simply flying... one of my best memories !Obviously to get the true perspective we have to rate the users by a capability index.
I prefer, like most, just to keep buying more and more expensive gear in the pious hope that the next wonder gear will automatically fully replace my lack of skills.
../..
Birding camera? No, but I don't have the skills for birds in flight no matter what camera body I use. But the G100 is fine with the PL 200/2.8 when I need a boost to my lack of skills and maybe catch a wallaby in mid-hop.
___
Photography is so easy, that's what makes it highly difficult - Robert Delpire
️ Unhappymeal for heads up.
Tennis is a fairly dynamic sport, and Pro-Captcha works in a specific area with pre-focusing. What exactly are you proposing to test there with Pro-Captcha?
