I don't know how many are in the same boat, but I got into dead end with this first world problem.
What I like in BF:
- Lens change option - different focal lengths, f2 aperture
- Simplicity
- Design
- Price (with one i lens half the price of GFX100RF)
- Interface
- Durability (no moving parts, card doors, screen mechanism)
- Working with 24MP raws more simple, faster, conivinient
In GFX 100RF:
- Huge sensor with high resolution for cropping ability, Bayer demosaic pattern fading away, better dynamic range, better tonality, colors.
- Complete camera, no urge building a system
- Ergonomic is exist, tall body grip, small lens bump the mass center in the body
- Size with the built in lens
- EVF
- Tilting screen
- Aspect ratio dial
- Hot shoe
- Leaf shutter
In BF the interchangeable lens is a huge deal, because in terms of the RF I have the 28mm FOV with F4 and done. But the cropping ability may helping, I use 28-50mm range excursively. On the same time in BF the lack of the flash use a bit pain, even if I'm not a flash photographer.
Both cameras built appeals me but in different way. The nostalgic, convinient and versatile RF design of the GFX, and one of my favourite DP2Q camera body like simple and sturdy BF. I'd get both, but even one of each is a quite investment.
There is one critical performance preference which still unclear, the AF.
