I already have 6 Alien Bees B800. I also have 5 Photogenic Powerlight 1500's. Does it make any sense at all to abandon these two platforms and switch to new technology such as the Good AD400Pro?
Granted, the Aliens and Photogenics are all manual but you get dependability and the ability to get them repaired after all these years if I need to. The folks at B&H told me today that if something happens to the Godox's after two years, you don't have the ability to get them repaired given their company is in China. Maybe newer isn't always better....... Any thoughts or opinions on this? Thanks for your responses.
As someone who owns both Paul C. Buff (the company that makes Alien Bees) and Godox flash systems, to me this is a totally apples-to-oranges comparison / consideration, and there are at least two huge issues:
(1)
Economical life: just because something can be repaired doesn't mean it makes sense to pay to have it repaired. A new Alien Bees B800 is a 320 W-s monolight that costs $300; a new Godox AD400Pro is a 400 W-S monolight that costs $529. If you have a five-year-old sample of either model, does it really makes sense to spend substantial money to have it repaired, instead of simply buying a new one?
(2)
Comparable products: the Alien Bees B800 and Godox AD400 Pro are very different products. The Godox includes a battery and is intended to run on battery, but the AB800 needs to be plugged in. The Godox has a built-in radio receiver and can be fully controlled from an $89 remote on your camera's hot shoe; the Alien Bees needs a $70 CyberSync just to be triggered remotely, and you can't remotely adjust the output. The Godox can work with high-speed sync and TTL control; the Alien Bees cannot. If you want more comparable products, then from Paul Buff you need to look at the Celestial.
I have a Paul Buff kit with 2 White Lightning X-3200 monolights, 1 White Lightning X-1600 monolight, the older-type CyberSync hot shoe trigger, and a CyberSync battery-powered receiver. It is heavily-built, professional-grade, old-school gear. If you don't need a hugely-wide system and mostly work in a studio or at least don't move the lighting gear around a lot, it's great.
I also have, not long ago, started assembling a small, but probably to-be-expanded, Godox kit, with a TT-685 II shoe-mount TTL flash, a TT-600 shoe-mount manual flash, and an XPro II shoe-mount trigger. The XPro II can totally control either or both flashes, independently of the other. It is lightly-built--but IMO not low-quality--gear. It's part of what's very likely the widest, most flexible, and most capable photo lighting system that has ever existed. It offers a lot more control / flexibility than the Paul Buff gear does. For low-fuss, low-muss shooting / anything remotely run-and-gun, it's a great counterpart to my Paul Buff gear.
Both are basically very good products, but they're very different. Paul Buff makes some newer models that are more like Godox gear, and I bet they're great. But to me, any of this is really about choosing the best tool for the job--and that's not always the same tool or even same brand of tool.