Canon LP-E6NH Performance

Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics, including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).

There's a nice clear graph in the following brief of the charge/discharge cycle (yellow graph):

https://qmed.com/sites/default/files/Electrochem Li-ion Battery Temp Trends.pdf

This one delves a bit more deeply:

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c04093

Another good general resource is "BatteryU":

https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-808-how-to-prolong-lithium-based-batteries

R2
None of those show the graph I'm looking for: x-axis is time, y-axis is temperature using a Canon charger (or equivalent scenario). I see now, quoted, above, "end of the discharge cycle". I thought we were talking about the end of a charge cycle, not discharge cycle.

--
Victor Engel
We are talking about charging

All the information is in that paper I titled for you but it won't be specific to lpe6xx batteries and chargers.

I can do the test however we do this in different types of calorimeters normally and we may have manufactured some instrumented cells.

When one asks for the temperature my question would be where? What's it's environment? What exactly is happening to the cell? Is the cell characterised?
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics,
including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).
I'm calling you out as just being rude R2. It's not acceptable. You have started to talk about something we are not, and now are throwing personal insults at people.

I'm very surprised r2
There's a nice clear graph in the following brief of the charge/discharge cycle (yellow graph):

https://qmed.com/sites/default/files/Electrochem Li-ion Battery Temp Trends.pdf
I can't find the source document which is important. But if it's how we would do this then what that graph is showing you, is for some sort of battery, under some sort of charge/discharge process, at some ambient, has this energy flow in/out of the calorimeter. You may see that close to the end of the charge cycle it most certainly doesn't create a large amount of heat.
This is a sister document to the one I suggested reading.what this looks to explore is the impact of aging. It is not a discussion about thermal transfer of cell systems. The organisation are well respected and a good resource.
I would generally advise people to take the resource with a pinch of salt.
R2

--
Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries
 
All the information is in that paper I titled for you but it won't be specific to lpe6xx batteries and chargers.
I was looking for graphs, specifically temperature vs. time.
 
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics, including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).
I'm calling you out as just being rude R2. It's not acceptable. You have started to talk about something we are not, and now are throwing personal insults at people.

I'm very surprised r2
Insults?? No need for histrionics! No rudeness was intended or should be perceived Ephemeris (I was actually being complimentary!). And I was also being truthful... as you were being both informative And argumentative (and for no reason that I could discern).

I think we're both trying to say the same thing actually: When it comes to Li-ion batteries, heat is bad at whatever stage it's present.

R2

--
Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries
 
Last edited:
All the information is in that paper I titled for you but it won't be specific to lpe6xx batteries and chargers.
I was looking for graphs, specifically temperature vs. time.

--
Victor Engel
Understood. I have some for customers work and some for cars.

Perhaps the best thing is is I log a canon pack at room temp both on case. I could perhaps do the same charging in a grip on camera.
 
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics, including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).
I'm calling you out as just being rude R2. It's not acceptable. You have started to talk about something we are not, and now are throwing personal insults at people.

I'm very surprised r2
Insults?? No need for histrionics! No rudeness was intended or should be perceived Ephemeris (I was actually being complimentary!).
argumentative in bold as you did. That is not a compliment and your being called out on it.
And I was also being truthful... as you were being both informative And argumentative (and for no reason that I could discern).
Your being called out again on repeating tour same insult.
I think we're both trying to say the same thing actually: When it comes to Li-ion batteries, heat is bad at whatever stage it's present.
I'm not trying to send insults so I'm not sure that is the same thing.

Perhaps one could cease with insults? It's not helping the question of temperature Vs charging on a canon charger.
R2

--
Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries
 
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics, including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).
I'm calling you out as just being rude R2. It's not acceptable. You have started to talk about something we are not, and now are throwing personal insults at people.

I'm very surprised r2
Insults?? No need for histrionics! No rudeness was intended or should be perceived Ephemeris (I was actually being complimentary!).
argumentative in bold as you did. That is not a compliment and your being called out on it.
Referring to someone as being argumentative is not an insult. Maybe the misunderstanding is a cultural thing?

Bottom line: don't take it that way. It was not intended.
R2
 
There are tons of resources out there that detail Li-ion charge/discharge/storage characteristics, including Ephemeris (when informative and not argumentative ;-) ).
I'm calling you out as just being rude R2. It's not acceptable. You have started to talk about something we are not, and now are throwing personal insults at people.

I'm very surprised r2
Insults?? No need for histrionics! No rudeness was intended or should be perceived Ephemeris (I was actually being complimentary!).
argumentative in bold as you did. That is not a compliment and your being called out on it.
Referring to someone as being argumentative is not an insult. Maybe the misunderstanding is a cultural thing?

Bottom line: don't take it that way. It was not intended.

R2
I'm saying your being rude. I've repeated that are you and it's not wanted. I trust this is clear across any cultures.

Now your arguing? How is that helping?
--
Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries
 
Are you using the same charger for all 4? Do you have another charger you can try?
I have 2 chargers and used them both in this case.
Thanks for the reference. It did help clear some things up. I'm not going to purchase new batteries at this time.
Even if an older battery is showing 1 red bar, if it is still working it’s still worth carrying along as a spare. I try to leave one in the car, and one in whatever pack/bag I’m using, in an internal pocket so as to never be completely caught out. I’ve often ended up lending it to someone else!

I would also suggest that if you have 2 camera bodies it’s well worth choosing them to have the same battery.
I would not leave one in the car. I suspect the wide swings in temperature from colder than ambient temperature overnight due to radiative cooling to 50 or 60 degrees above ambient temperature when sitting in the blaring sun are not very good for batteries.
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly
So that would mean it's not creating the most heat.
but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
The charge cycleooks pretty similar to the few suppliers I looked at that make the same cells. Canon don't make the cells.
I don't believe it's about the cells, but about the circuitry in the battery. The battery isn't simply a couple of cells connected electronically. There is also circuitry to control the charging. That's what I was referring to.
It's all about the cells and the charger is what controls the charging.
Victor Engel
Hmm - I'll have to check on that. There are many threads suggesting to use official Canon batteries because they include circuitry to control charging.

That didn't take long. https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Canon+LP-E6+battery+pack+Teardown/133243
 
Are you using the same charger for all 4? Do you have another charger you can try?
I have 2 chargers and used them both in this case.
Thanks for the reference. It did help clear some things up. I'm not going to purchase new batteries at this time.
Even if an older battery is showing 1 red bar, if it is still working it’s still worth carrying along as a spare. I try to leave one in the car, and one in whatever pack/bag I’m using, in an internal pocket so as to never be completely caught out. I’ve often ended up lending it to someone else!

I would also suggest that if you have 2 camera bodies it’s well worth choosing them to have the same battery.
I would not leave one in the car. I suspect the wide swings in temperature from colder than ambient temperature overnight due to radiative cooling to 50 or 60 degrees above ambient temperature when sitting in the blaring sun are not very good for batteries.
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly
So that would mean it's not creating the most heat.
but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
The charge cycleooks pretty similar to the few suppliers I looked at that make the same cells. Canon don't make the cells.
I don't believe it's about the cells, but about the circuitry in the battery. The battery isn't simply a couple of cells connected electronically. There is also circuitry to control the charging. That's what I was referring to.
It's all about the cells and the charger is what controls the charging.
Victor Engel
Hmm - I'll have to check on that. There are many threads suggesting to use official Canon batteries because they include circuitry to control charging.

That didn't take long. https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Canon+LP-E6+battery+pack+Teardown/133243
Ha - as I suspected, 2x CR18500 cells. The best quality Panasonic 2040mAh cells are only about £/$/€ 10 each.
Indeed. Exactly what they have provided is unknown but something along those lines.
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?

Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
 
Last edited:
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?

Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
Thanks, I am interested in knowing what this thread started out to seek as well, but steered way off into answering. I havent been able to use those bars in any meaningful way myself
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?

Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
Thanks, I am interested in knowing what this thread started out to seek as well, but steered way off into answering. I havent been able to use those bars in any meaningful way myself
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?
I posted a few responses along the way of what Canon said it was in one of there kind of info papers and also from the R7 manual (I was reading it at the time).

This is from an old EOS magazine.


This is from the 1DX MKiii manual where it appears the charger has the recharge performance display.

Is this a state of health parameter Canon describe? I'm not sure. Perhaps the charger times how long it takes to reach the voltage control limit in the charger cycle to use it as an estimators for how much charge is stored.

Perhaps even more simple is a voltage measurement at the current cutoff at end of charging.

I'm not sure.

I'm also not sure how that's transferred to the camera. Or does the camera form a simple current measurement by passing a 1kHz AC across the cell to use as an estimator for battery resistance?



1425ffc9802442268dc3841c4c33a196.jpg

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?
I would think if this is passed digitally to the battery from charger , and then to the camera then we should be able to measure that data on an oscilloscope. It would seem a complex way to do it.

Counter. Perhaps but then one still needs to transfer the data. Perhaps they do.

Measuring the resistance would be easier I'd think.
Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
It seems like it's something they have had as a feature for a long time (perhaps before 1Dx Mk iii).

Questioning it's usefulness seems reasonable. I also have some batteries showing red but that's doesn't preclude me from using them. How they compare to a new for some simple charge / discharge graphs I suppose may help us a little but I think that just says I'm testing an older lithium cell compared to a new one so I should be able to anticipate the result before doing any work.

I think power from these batteries is a problem. Notionally there a circa 25W battery when new and charged. But at what point in the state of charge // life span does some of the camera features shut down? 8k /4k120 perhaps, or high frame rate shooting.

I run grips on the r5s but the camera doesn't appear to be able to use them concurrently and keep that available power level up for longer.

We develop some power tool batteries (the models for them) and say we have a 2000W tool then long before the battery is depleted you don't have a 2000W tool any longer as the system is power limited by the battery.
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?

Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
Thanks, I am interested in knowing what this thread started out to seek as well, but steered way off into answering. I havent been able to use those bars in any meaningful way myself
Someone posted a link elsewhere in this thread to an article that was I think from Canon Europe. Somewhere toward the end this question is answered. Basically three green bars means a new battery, two green bars means the battery is not new but still functioning within Canon’s acceptable limits, one green bar means the battery performance is dropping near the bottom of Canon’s acceptable limit and a red bar means Canon feels the battery needs to be replaced because it’s no longer operating at full capacity.
 
I'll have to look for this screen. Up until now, my technique is to shoot until the camera no longer functions, at which point I change the battery. This works for non-critical applications, which is what I normally do. When shooting a wedding or clips for a 48 hour film contest or something, the battery gets swapped out more frequently. When we were filming for the 48 hour film contest, the process generally went like this:

Set up the scene.
Shoot a few takes.
Finish the scene, at this point both battery and card are replaced.
Battery just removed is put in a charter and replaced with a fresh one.
Card is dumped to a laptop and then passed on to another laptop and dumped again.
So now we have two copies of the clips and can safely reuse the card.
The card is placed with the battery that is charging.

It was a nice assembly line. The camera was a Can 5D Mark II not long after it came out, so video on Canon DSLRs was relatively new. I think this was before 24 fps was introduced in updated firmware.

The only other "critical" use is live performances. In those cases, I have spare batteries nearby and replace them during a lull in the performance, usually at the same time as replacing the card. That said, it's unusual for a single charged up battery is not sufficient for a whole shooting session for me.
 
Actually it's not the temperature swings that would have a negative impact, it's the Heat. Heat is what kills Li-ion batteries, and that final 10% of the charging cycle is what builds up the most heat (as does baking it in a car).

R2
Why would the last 10% create the most heat? During this the current is reducing towards zero.
Probably it's accumulating more slowly but is adding to the heat already there from earlier charging, until the cooling to ambient temperature is faster than the warming from charging. This would be another reason to charge slowly instead of quickly. Heat could dissipate while charging. I have a feeling Canon have figured all those details out and taper off the charge appropriately.
Thanks Victor, I didn't have time to explain any more thoroughly (had to head to work). The heat accumulates the most by the end of the charging cycle. It's very bad to charge (or keep charging) a hot battery!
It won't be hot R2. The charge currents are small.

The current is tapered as per the expeditions of the cell manufacturer until the expected cutoff, probably around 30mA.

It is quite plausible the end of the cycle isnt the point of maximum temperature for a cell, and it would be unusual if it was. So I don't think this is the right way to view it.
Look at the last line in my post (which you ignored ;-) ). That of course describes Canon's circuitry (which prevents cooking of the battery during charging). However I've seen other 3rd party manuf that don't do so well!

In addition there are other factors that can come into play that will change the heat production curve of the charging cycle, such as immediately charging a hot freshly-depleted battery, or charging a battery when the ambient temperature is high. Every manuf I've seen recommends against doing either of these.
Discharge is even worse. The heat generated internally gets very high (due primarily to the increased internal resistance) as the battery gets depleted.
If we notionally say we will pull 25W, or 3A and power will reduce the temperature of the battery should be thought about as a delta from its start point. So assuming it will be hot I also don't think is correct.
Look at any temperature test curves done on Li-ion batteries. You'll see that huge spike at the end of the discharge cycle. Or just feel the thing with your hand!
I looked for such a curve but didn't find one. I do notice my laptop warming up when it is charging. I've not noticed it with Canon batteries, but I don't have them sitting on my lap when they're charging either.
It appears that discharge is what R2 was thinking about, but maximum rate of charge also won't be at the end of discharge.

There are a lot of thermal models used related to both the analysis of entropic charging but also being able to monitor/predict. For example in a car we implement certain cells discharging, other cells used in regen to better equalise the thermal energy within a pack. This is to improve performance rather than longevity

There is an open paper called something like thermal analysis of a fast charging method for high power lithium ion cells. That gives some description of ways in which thermal impacts to charging are taken into account when one wants to fast charge.
Ephemeris, you’re clearly very knowledgeable about, and professionally involved with, battery and charging technology. I asked a question earlier that I don’t think has been answered.

Main question: What do the three bars (3 green, 2 green, or 1 red) displayed on the battery info screen actually represent?

Sub questions : Are they an actual measure of “recharge performance”? If so, how is that being measured, and how/where is that information stored? On the battery IC or in the camera? Logic would suggest in the battery IC as it reads the same in different camera bodies. Or is it a “counter”, simply documenting the number of charge/discharge cycles? Or something else, such as state of discharge before recharging? Or measuring increased internal cell resistance as the battery ages?

Canon clearly wants us to buy a new battery when we see one red bar, yet the batteries continue working.
Thanks, I am interested in knowing what this thread started out to seek as well, but steered way off into answering. I havent been able to use those bars in any meaningful way myself
Someone posted a link elsewhere in this thread to an article that was I think from Canon Europe. Somewhere toward the end this question is answered. Basically three green bars means a new battery, two green bars means the battery is not new but still functioning within Canon’s acceptable limits, one green bar means the battery performance is dropping near the bottom of Canon’s acceptable limit and a red bar means Canon feels the battery needs to be replaced because it’s no longer operating at full capacity.
I've posted a few but this was the first.

Its also within some advanced camera manuals and I spotted it in the manual for the 1DX MK III charger.

https://www.eos-magazine.com/articles/eospedia/batterycheck.html

Looking for any data transfer between bAttery and camera I can look at, but I am not expecting to find any.

I did think of comparing a red bar battery to a 3 green but for us that's just the comparison of an old battery to a new so I'm not sure how helpful that is.
Indeed - have read that and the manual(s). But it does not say what it is measuring or even what it means in terms of battery longevity (cycles, not the amount of charge remaining). Seems highly subjective yet we know it must be somehow recorded or encoded in the battery IC. And 3rd party batteries that also activate that display must either have copied or reverse engineered the information.
 
As no one seems to have any idea what Canon are measuring, is it too cynical to assume that they are purely going by the age of the battery?

As to the question whether it is advisable to remove the battery from the camera or not, I think that depends on the type of internal clock battery the camera employs.

Cameras like my R5 are supposed to use a capacitor for that purpose and it might be irrelevant whether it holds the charge or drains over time, but for cameras, like the M6 mk2 and other M cameras that employ a non user replaceable internal clock battery it is advisable to leave a battery inside the camera, or you will shorten the life of the internal clock battery considerably.

--
Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time. But now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.
 
Last edited:
As no one seems to have any idea what Canon are measuring, is it too cynical to assume that they are purely going by the age of the battery?

As to the question whether it is advisable to remove the battery from the camera or not, I think that depends on the type of internal clock battery the camera employs.

Cameras like my R5 are supposed to use a capacitor for that purpose and it might be irrelevant whether it holds the charge or drains over time, but for cameras, like the M6 mk2 and other M cameras that employ a non user replaceable internal clock battery it is advisable to leave a battery inside the camera, or you will shorten the life of the internal clock battery considerably.
 
Well, whatever they might measure, it's probably best ignored or managed in the way you suggest.

I haven't noticed any significant capacity differences in terms of shots or video performance between batteries they write off with one red bar and others with green bars. Canon have a way of fleecing users with accessories and especially batteries ...

P.S: I am full of admiration for your fantastic bird galleries!

Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time. But now that it's the opposite it's twice upon a time.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top