February 2024 Part 1 — This Month Through Your Adapted Lens

Alan WF

Senior Member
Messages
3,976
Solutions
2
Reaction score
3,357
Location
Mexico City, MX
An invitation to dust off your precious (or not so precious) glass and head out to make some photographs: the real reason for the existence of all our lenses.

Here are the guidelines:
  • Images with a removable adapter between the lens and the camera
  • Images with the lens mount permanently modified to fit a different camera
  • Images with the lens held by hand without an adapter (free-lensing)
  • Including metadata (camera, lens, aperture, shutter speed) is encouraged but not required.
  • Comments are encouraged, but please keep them friendly and constructive.
Continued from the January 2024 thread .

Regards,

Alan
 
A busy Hairy Woodpecker (Leuconotopicus villosus) scouring a pine for insects.

Regards,

Alan

Canon M50 Mark II with Canon EF to EF-M adaptor, Kenko TELEPLUS-HD 1.4x DGX extender, and Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM at 350 mm (cropped to 970 mm), f/8, 1/800 second, and ISO 500.
Canon M50 Mark II with Canon EF to EF-M adaptor, Kenko TELEPLUS-HD 1.4x DGX extender, and Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM at 350 mm (cropped to 970 mm), f/8, 1/800 second, and ISO 500.
 
Yashinon 45mm f/1.4, from Lynx-14e RF, on a Sony A6000

f/1.8
f/1.8
 
Last edited:
So when I was at a sale last weekend, I ran across a Tamron SP 500mm mirror lens, the 55B version. While I already have a copy of the 55BB version, this one was only $35... and it has a built-in tripod mount, which the 55BB doesn't. I couldn't resist. <sheepish look> From what I've read, the IQ on the 55B is supposed to be slightly weaker than the 55BB, but I haven't had a chance to shoot them side-by-side yet.

 Lumix S5, Tamron SP 500mm (55B)
Lumix S5, Tamron SP 500mm (55B)

The unfortunate part about the tripod mount is that it's actually fairly heavy, compared to the 55BB, and it was also the first time I've used a mirror on the S5, so I wasn't terribly steady handholding it at first.

2dab4dde97104e10b4ff630e19267d74.jpg

Got somewhat better with practice, at least.

93cac58900dd464bb1e2dcf6db0584e2.jpg

And for comparison's sake, some shots with my next-most-recent find, the Kiron 80-200/4.5 Macro:

 Lumix S5, Kiron 80-200/4.5 Macro (80mm)
Lumix S5, Kiron 80-200/4.5 Macro (80mm)

I like the Kiron a lot, but the Tamron doesn't do badly against it.

dbb2b459cba7485eb71529f05ffadd6f.jpg



Tamron 55B
Tamron 55B



Kiron 80-200
Kiron 80-200

And a couple of final 'just because' shots:

Tamron 55B
Tamron 55B



Kiron 80-200
Kiron 80-200



--
Flickr at https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_prof67/ Warning: Heavy Learning in progress.
 
30km of walking last weekend. There is an amazing grafiti tonnel which has overtaken this post a bit., lots of color and character there.

i typed a bit of a story but lost a connection, will comment on a lens in a reply comments, enjoyed it very much - my first manual focus experience on the street.

8d9d2e0c78374be38e070c40815f100e.jpg

4049ec135e8f490db40546b4c85aca69.jpg

26481fd200f44e26bf928e5d0067c599.jpg

a3eb53e2433f49bd899ffb4aca9430a6.jpg





692131f9d0c3446493c4ba581e328471.jpg

983f5c94440046fe8791f389667c3eb7.jpg

414c4f19ffce4600af1ca02289f71c1a.jpg

36d59b3f17d441cdbf820e7e08f37d68.jpg

8c5cc9c3bd974706a6d103c05b8d11b6.jpg

ed7d63483c504626bdf1552d83325d5f.jpg

2b8a726ce7504a44845d25d440979219.jpg

64057d75571747f2b26c18722bc578f7.jpg

2211db91445b48e89f7a089532f0901f.jpg

36b7ff2a6b8e4f9bbd5fdf75bbde20c0.jpg

e780334efd154327ab2969efc75c92df.jpg

0854872051574db497ee9f19f77457e4.jpg

bafa8ac2e58349ff891db7d4a0ebfcdd.jpg

cbecc9b810c64c27bb3a6d4df8e71c64.jpg

33d1432526ac42fbb3909829b333c6c0.jpg

This one is by Fuji’s 35mm f1.4 from the same spot for comparison, both are unedited!
This one is by Fuji’s 35mm f1.4 from the same spot for comparison, both are unedited!

--
https://500px.com/bc-foto
 
Last edited:
30km of walking last weekend. There is an amazing grafiti tonnel which has overtaken this post a bit., lots of color and character there.

i typed a bit of a story but lost a connection, will comment on a lens in a reply comments, enjoyed it very much - my first manual focus experience on the street.
Definitely some nice pics there.

I'll be curious to hear what you think of the Pentax - was that the M42 SMC Takumar/Super-Tak, or one of the K-mount versions? I have both the Super-Tak and the Pentax-M K-mount; they're both nice lenses, and I've used the M somewhat more than the Super-Tak, but neither one's really grabbed me emotionally the way the Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 has; that's my current favorite 28.
 
30km of walking last weekend. There is an amazing grafiti tonnel which has overtaken this post a bit., lots of color and character there.

i typed a bit of a story but lost a connection, will comment on a lens in a reply comments, enjoyed it very much - my first manual focus experience on the street.
Definitely some nice pics there.

I'll be curious to hear what you think of the Pentax - was that the M42 SMC Takumar/Super-Tak, or one of the K-mount versions? I have both the Super-Tak and the Pentax-M K-mount; they're both nice lenses, and I've used the M somewhat more than the Super-Tak, but neither one's really grabbed me emotionally the way the Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 has; that's my current favorite 28.
 
T-Rex Mark wrote:
30km of walking last weekend. There is an amazing grafiti tonnel which has overtaken this post a bit., lots of color and character there.

i typed a bit of a story but lost a connection, will comment on a lens in a reply comments, enjoyed it very much - my first manual focus experience on the street.
Definitely some nice pics there.

I'll be curious to hear what you think of the Pentax - was that the M42 SMC Takumar/Super-Tak, or one of the K-mount versions? I have both the Super-Tak and the Pentax-M K-mount; they're both nice lenses, and I've used the M somewhat more than the Super-Tak, but neither one's really grabbed me emotionally the way the Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 has; that's my current favorite 28.
Thanks very much Travis! This is my only 28mm and the widest vintage lens (all others are 50mm+) so my closest comparison is to Fuji’s modern 35mm f1.4. It is a Pentax K-mount I understand it was only made in 1976-1977 predating Pentax M. I hunted for it a bit after seeing it highlighted by Simon Utak as one of the best 28mm vintage lenses and me wanting a wider angle for the street
Ah! Yeah, I've heard good things about the pre-M 28mm; I've most often heard that generation called either 'Pentax-K' or 'SMC Pentax' lenses.
I believe its color outcome is great, it is quite sharp although some of these images ended with higher ISO which affects resolution but I don’t mind a bit of grain. It is sharp - many of the people shots were candid where I eyeballed the distance when taking a shot. The focus throw is probably the shortest out of all the lenses I have. The handling is great. I think the landscapes and architecture really pop in how they are rendered not just colors.
Yeah, I was seeing that in your pics.

My main opinion of the Pentax-M was formed in a comparison shoot I did in 2020 with several 28mm lenses I'd picked up over the years; this was before I got the Vivitar (Kiron) f/2.5. https://flic.kr/s/aHsmPnCCuW has the pics.

The main thing I appreciate about the Kiron is how it renders subtle tonality - the gloss on a car, the tonal variations that give clouds a 3D look.



Lumix S5, Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5
Lumix S5, Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5



Lumix S5, Vivittar (Kiron) 28/2.5
Lumix S5, Vivittar (Kiron) 28/2.5
one really strange thing is how the focus peaking has a wider range of when camera highlights that things are in focus. Perhaps it’s due to the short focus throw and f3.5 being the widest aperture. Curious of your experiences with wider lenses and focus peaking. It requires you to carefully assess whether you are getting the best out of the range when things are highlighted to be in focus.
I use focus peaking in a couple of ways. I'll pan the focus back and forth across a range as I watch the peaking strengthen and weaken, settling on where it's strongest. Or when it's really tough and critical, I'll use the magnify function to zoom in to get the best view of the peaking.
it’s great to know about the Kiron 28mm, I now will look specifically at Flickr, it would be interesting to see them side by side. I am thinking if I got another wider lens I would probably get to 23-25mm - as I enjoyed going down from 35mm to 28mm, and I know that 16mm is too wide from own experience. Any recommendations / experience with 23-25?
I've used two main 24mm lenses - the OM Zuiko 24/2.8 and the Minolta MD 24/2.8 - plus the MD 24-50/4 zoom. The Zuiko is one of my favorite lenses; the Minolta 24/2.8 is very nice, but kind of bulky. If you can live with the slower aperture, the 24-50 can be very nice.



Sigma fp, MD 24-50/4
Sigma fp, MD 24-50/4



--
Flickr at https://www.flickr.com/photos/the_prof67/ Warning: Heavy Learning in progress.
 
T-Rex Mark wrote:
30km of walking last weekend. There is an amazing grafiti tonnel which has overtaken this post a bit., lots of color and character there.

i typed a bit of a story but lost a connection, will comment on a lens in a reply comments, enjoyed it very much - my first manual focus experience on the street.
Definitely some nice pics there.

I'll be curious to hear what you think of the Pentax - was that the M42 SMC Takumar/Super-Tak, or one of the K-mount versions? I have both the Super-Tak and the Pentax-M K-mount; they're both nice lenses, and I've used the M somewhat more than the Super-Tak, but neither one's really grabbed me emotionally the way the Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5 has; that's my current favorite 28.
Thanks very much Travis! This is my only 28mm and the widest vintage lens (all others are 50mm+) so my closest comparison is to Fuji’s modern 35mm f1.4. It is a Pentax K-mount I understand it was only made in 1976-1977 predating Pentax M. I hunted for it a bit after seeing it highlighted by Simon Utak as one of the best 28mm vintage lenses and me wanting a wider angle for the street
Ah! Yeah, I've heard good things about the pre-M 28mm; I've most often heard that generation called either 'Pentax-K' or 'SMC Pentax' lenses.
I believe its color outcome is great, it is quite sharp although some of these images ended with higher ISO which affects resolution but I don’t mind a bit of grain. It is sharp - many of the people shots were candid where I eyeballed the distance when taking a shot. The focus throw is probably the shortest out of all the lenses I have. The handling is great. I think the landscapes and architecture really pop in how they are rendered not just colors.
Yeah, I was seeing that in your pics.

My main opinion of the Pentax-M was formed in a comparison shoot I did in 2020 with several 28mm lenses I'd picked up over the years; this was before I got the Vivitar (Kiron) f/2.5. https://flic.kr/s/aHsmPnCCuW has the pics.

The main thing I appreciate about the Kiron is how it renders subtle tonality - the gloss on a car, the tonal variations that give clouds a 3D look.

Lumix S5, Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5
Lumix S5, Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2.5

Lumix S5, Vivittar (Kiron) 28/2.5
Lumix S5, Vivittar (Kiron) 28/2.5
one really strange thing is how the focus peaking has a wider range of when camera highlights that things are in focus. Perhaps it’s due to the short focus throw and f3.5 being the widest aperture. Curious of your experiences with wider lenses and focus peaking. It requires you to carefully assess whether you are getting the best out of the range when things are highlighted to be in focus.
I use focus peaking in a couple of ways. I'll pan the focus back and forth across a range as I watch the peaking strengthen and weaken, settling on where it's strongest. Or when it's really tough and critical, I'll use the magnify function to zoom in to get the best view of the peaking.
it’s great to know about the Kiron 28mm, I now will look specifically at Flickr, it would be interesting to see them side by side. I am thinking if I got another wider lens I would probably get to 23-25mm - as I enjoyed going down from 35mm to 28mm, and I know that 16mm is too wide from own experience. Any recommendations / experience with 23-25?
I've used two main 24mm lenses - the OM Zuiko 24/2.8 and the Minolta MD 24/2.8 - plus the MD 24-50/4 zoom. The Zuiko is one of my favorite lenses; the Minolta 24/2.8 is very nice, but kind of bulky. If you can live with the slower aperture, the 24-50 can be very nice.

Sigma fp, MD 24-50/4
Sigma fp, MD 24-50/4


Have you compared the Vivitar (Kiron) 28mm f2.5 to the Vivitar (Komine) 28mm f2.8 Close Focus? Or anyone else compare the two? The latter is smaller unless I'm looking at the wrong Vivitar (Kiron).
 
Have you compared the Vivitar (Kiron) 28mm f2.5 to the Vivitar (Komine) 28mm f2.8 Close Focus? Or anyone else compare the two? The latter is smaller unless I'm looking at the wrong Vivitar (Kiron).
I had a couple of other Vivitar 28mm's - from 4+ years back, so I don't remember which version they are, though I might still be able to dig them out. I remember so little about them because they were unimpressive in my test shooting; tho it might be worth digging them out and trying them again for that reason.

The f/2.5 Kiron is definitely larger than average... tho not all that heavy, because a lot of the bulk is the widely flared filter ring. The barrel actually feels a bit narrower than average.
 
Yep I see what you mean, nice results from Kiron. I also found your earlier thread https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66898219, here the outdoors pictures seem very similar to how I think the Pentax would have rendered. I also saw very nice pictures on Flickr where they used it for flower photography with extensions, I will try that with my Pentax. Also nice picture from Minolta zoom.

In general though I find differences in how wider angle less distinguishable than standard angle. I looked through your nice shootout for 28mm and there is a lot of similarity from lens to lens. Probably much more visible on the larger screen though :-)
 
Great lighting. I like this portrait a lot.

Regards,

Alan
 
Asahi Takumar 200mm f/3.5
Asahi Takumar 200mm f/3.5

A tulip photo from spring of 2023. With more grays and browns in the middle of winter here in the US, I am looking forward to the coming spring and the return of more vibrant colors. In the meantime, I thought this would be a good time to inject a little color here as a preview of things to come...

Taken with a Nikon Z7 and an Asahi Takumar 200mm f/3.5 lens - M42 mount, 4 lens elements in 4 groups, 18 aperture blades, and produced from 1958 to 1965.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top