Generally impressed with Topaz Photo AI

...Hopefully the day will come when nobody feels a need to use Lightroom.
Many alternatives out there. LR is just one product among many others.
I already have 3 different alternatives on 1 of my computers. That's not even counting Linux based alternatives, which I also have.

Somebody stated that DxO PhotoLab 6 ELITE edition which is touted as a complete, end-to-end, RAW photo editing software, would also have the new version of DeepPrime.
DeepPRIME XD was the headline major enhancement in PhotoLab 6 Elite almost six months ago. Soon, no doubt, the speculation about the PL7 contents will start. But if previous releases are any guide, the speculation will all be wrong.
 
We are trying DXO Photolab 6 now. Deep prime works well, the color modules have user controls. Use it mainly for raw conversions vs DPP. We were thinking of adding Topaz Sharpen AI for sharpening. Any experience with the latter vs Photo AI?
Sharpen AI is now at the end-of-life stage. All the development work is going into Photo AI, so even if Sharpen AI may still be better for some images, Photo AI is likely to overtake it soon.
I’m curious, that’s a pretty bold statement, is there a source of information on this or a prediction? Not that I doubt about that photo AI isn’t a worthy program, just curious about “end-of-life “ stage for Sharpen AI.
 
It keeps getting better. I use it and PureRaw 2. Every file is different and sometimes PAI does better and sometimes PR does. In the fall we will see where PAI is and how much they want for the upgrade.
Paying for a Topaz upgrade? That's not how Topaz works. If you pay the annual maintenance fee, you get all the upgrades that arrive in that year. That might be only one or two for DeNoise AI or 50 for Photo AI.
There are 52 weeks in a year. Could be more than 50 updates in a year
 
I have DxO Pure Raw 2. It can do an absolutely great job in many situations.
My first impression, Pure Raw 3 is much improved. I keep hearing about folks using a given software but still using Lightroom. I want standalone products. Be that Topaz or Pure Raw. Hopefully the day will come when nobody feels a need to use Lightroom.
After Adobe implements AI it may be the other way around.
It has AI?
Only Auto has AI for now. Reports by members here that some are beta testing NR AI for both LrC and PS. PS has Neural AI on the wait list. Just a matter of time.

That is all Adobe really needs now for a major update. With the new masking, performance improvements, etc not much significant to add, for me anyway.

--
Don't Look Up.
Adobe has AI for upscaling? At least I think so as I use it sometimes. It has other AI tools as well but maybe you mean AI for NR?

My license just gives me the standard NR both for PC and mobile. I wish Adobe could bring some tool like upscaling to a mobile platform.
 
It keeps getting better. I use it and PureRaw 2. Every file is different and sometimes PAI does better and sometimes PR does. In the fall we will see where PAI is and how much they want for the upgrade.
Paying for a Topaz upgrade? That's not how Topaz works. If you pay the annual maintenance fee, you get all the upgrades that arrive in that year. That might be only one or two for DeNoise AI or 50 for Photo AI.
There are 52 weeks in a year. Could be more than 50 updates in a year
I'm expecting the Photo AI releases to slow down soon. The product is now complete enough not to need beta test-like release cycles.

There's an overhead cost to both the developers and the users with each release, and they're not worth doing unless there's useful incremental content in each. So, releases will probably drop back to a monthly cycle soon.
 
I love the App . . . performs incredibly well most of the time IMHO . . . and it keeps getting better!

Best,

V G
 
We are trying DXO Photolab 6 now. Deep prime works well, the color modules have user controls. Use it mainly for raw conversions vs DPP. We were thinking of adding Topaz Sharpen AI for sharpening. Any experience with the latter vs Photo AI?
Sharpen AI is now at the end-of-life stage. All the development work is going into Photo AI, so even if Sharpen AI may still be better for some images, Photo AI is likely to overtake it soon.
I’m curious, that’s a pretty bold statement, is there a source of information on this or a prediction? Not that I doubt about that photo AI isn’t a worthy program, just curious about “end-of-life “ stage for Sharpen AI.
Here's a reliable source of information:


Digital Nigel's paraphrasing doesn't match it, but Photo AI may fully replace the other apps.
 
Thanks for the link.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top