LtColDavenport
Well-known member
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 18
Hi,
I have just purchased my first D500 and I have a question about the Buffer and the SD card to use.
For slot n. 1, I have the fasted XQD Lexar make. No problem. 200 RAW images.
But, I don't like shooting on just one card and I like to have a back up. So I put inside a UHS-I 95 MB/s card (Lexar Bronze) I had and set RAW+JPG Fine*. I do a first test and I was shocked at first, merely 25 image. I mean I was expecting less, but not that much. I have an X-Pro2 that has both RAW and JPG bigger in file size, slot n.2 it is just UHS-I and I can take around 50 picture at 8 FPS, and the limit it is probably still the RAW, not the JPG. How can it perform better than a D500?
I took a breath and decided that maybe was the card. So I take a UHS-II V60 (Lexar gold, the same used in my X-Pro) and put it in the D500. Repeated the test and...27 images. It was barely an improved, honestly, I am not sure if it is just a normal variance error.
So I did one last test. I turned off all camera correction for JPG, dropped the quality from FINE* to FINE and I got.... 30. Sure, at least it is a sure improvement this time but, is it normal? It almost feels like my D500 write at UHS-I. The card should be twice as first, if not more (tested), why I am getting such a small improvement? If on UHS-I it take 25 images, I would expect something around 50 on UHS-II. Am I doing something wrong?
Reading online, I found out that the D500 haven't worked nicely with Lexar SD, and unfortunately I just have those lying around as far as UHS-II goes. But I also read that Nikon should have fixed it with a firmware update (I have the latest) and Lexar should have also tried to fix it by their part on newer SDs (I bought them 2 months ago, the issue was reported on D500 release, so...).
It may be worth try to buy another brand? Maybe try a V90 card this time? Or it would just be a waste of money and what I am seeing are the performance I should be getting for some reason?
Just for further information, I leave this link , it is a Review I found about the Nikon D500 SD card performance. Not that updated but it's something. Simply based on that site numbers, it seems that the D500 internal SD connection top up at around 160+ MB/s, considering a JPG it is around 11-14 MB, at 10FPS it should be around 110/140MB/s hence less than what the Buffer to SD connection should be. So may be my SD card?
If anyone has any further information it would be appreciated. I don't need a buffer of 200 images, but on the other hand, 25 it is really small, especially for what this camera was designed for. I would be more than happy if I could land in something in between.
Thanks in advance.
I have just purchased my first D500 and I have a question about the Buffer and the SD card to use.
For slot n. 1, I have the fasted XQD Lexar make. No problem. 200 RAW images.
But, I don't like shooting on just one card and I like to have a back up. So I put inside a UHS-I 95 MB/s card (Lexar Bronze) I had and set RAW+JPG Fine*. I do a first test and I was shocked at first, merely 25 image. I mean I was expecting less, but not that much. I have an X-Pro2 that has both RAW and JPG bigger in file size, slot n.2 it is just UHS-I and I can take around 50 picture at 8 FPS, and the limit it is probably still the RAW, not the JPG. How can it perform better than a D500?
I took a breath and decided that maybe was the card. So I take a UHS-II V60 (Lexar gold, the same used in my X-Pro) and put it in the D500. Repeated the test and...27 images. It was barely an improved, honestly, I am not sure if it is just a normal variance error.
So I did one last test. I turned off all camera correction for JPG, dropped the quality from FINE* to FINE and I got.... 30. Sure, at least it is a sure improvement this time but, is it normal? It almost feels like my D500 write at UHS-I. The card should be twice as first, if not more (tested), why I am getting such a small improvement? If on UHS-I it take 25 images, I would expect something around 50 on UHS-II. Am I doing something wrong?
Reading online, I found out that the D500 haven't worked nicely with Lexar SD, and unfortunately I just have those lying around as far as UHS-II goes. But I also read that Nikon should have fixed it with a firmware update (I have the latest) and Lexar should have also tried to fix it by their part on newer SDs (I bought them 2 months ago, the issue was reported on D500 release, so...).
It may be worth try to buy another brand? Maybe try a V90 card this time? Or it would just be a waste of money and what I am seeing are the performance I should be getting for some reason?
Just for further information, I leave this link , it is a Review I found about the Nikon D500 SD card performance. Not that updated but it's something. Simply based on that site numbers, it seems that the D500 internal SD connection top up at around 160+ MB/s, considering a JPG it is around 11-14 MB, at 10FPS it should be around 110/140MB/s hence less than what the Buffer to SD connection should be. So may be my SD card?
If anyone has any further information it would be appreciated. I don't need a buffer of 200 images, but on the other hand, 25 it is really small, especially for what this camera was designed for. I would be more than happy if I could land in something in between.
Thanks in advance.