During the years I have learned in DPR that in the (wider) "Anglo American" world, (US, UK, Aus, ie), photographic pictures are very roughly classified into "snapshots", "good images" and "fine art", according to the properties, qualities and also who is the photographer and even how many minutes the photographer uses to take the picture :-D However, the distinction between these "classes" doesn't seem very clear, and much depends on who gives the verdict.
Somebody even had the rule that you need to use minimum a few minutes to take the picture for it not to be a "snapshot" :-D
In the few other languages I speak it seems that you just "classify" photographic pictures in poor, reasonable, good and excellent pictures, regardless of how many minutes you have used to take the picture?
Also some pictures are called "artistic", without any specific explanation. So this "artistic" classification would probably correspond to the "fine art" classification?
Jahn
