Skeeterbytes
Forum Pro
Mistake, or artistic choice? Experts disagree!
I presume the runner's exhaustion is the photo's main intent.
Cheers,
Rick
I presume the runner's exhaustion is the photo's main intent.
Cheers,
Rick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do think this is a fair point. When I look at really talented sports photographers' work, and consider many of the "rules", I see them violated all the time. Wide action shots instead of tight crops because the context was more of the story, cropping motion to allow space to run into (but maybe not), level horizons (except when it's more interesting not), rule of thirds is probably the most violated rule it probably isn't even in the list.Mistake, or artistic choice? Experts disagree!
All fair points. My issue was with citing "mistakes."I do think this is a fair point. When I look at really talented sports photographers' work, and consider many of the "rules", I see them violated all the time. Wide action shots instead of tight crops because the context was more of the story, cropping motion to allow space to run into (but maybe not), level horizons (except when it's more interesting not), rule of thirds is probably the most violated rule it probably isn't even in the list.Mistake, or artistic choice? Experts disagree!
I do not suggest that the "rules" are wrong, but rather they are good guidance for most shots until the photographer reaches the point they decide it is better in some case to do otherwise.
I also suggest that the only way the photographer knows when that is, is to make some efforts along that line and see how it goes. Some will be mistakes, some not and will improvements.
I suggest that pointing out the "rules" is helpful. Arguing about them is not. Everyone has to find their path, and cropping wide for an editor to make choices is absolutely valid (and often requested).
Honestly, to some extent the only way we REALLY judge is which shots editors pick, and I remain so baffled by those choices some days I feel like the only rule is "take a bunch of random stuff because there's no way to tell what gets picked.
I have literally had sports editors take a vertical dunk shot in basketball (a good one, and star player), crop it very wide horizontally, and omit the ball and basket. OK, it showed the face, but ... really?
Linwood

I had two goals: avoid monotonous cropping (I'm not shooting for a yearbook), and leave space to give my boss the option to crop photos however he wants because he knows this doesn't bother me. Following "rules" where there are only three "proper" ways to crop a photo would go against both those goals.I do think this is a fair point. When I look at really talented sports photographers' work, and consider many of the "rules", I see them violated all the time. Wide action shots instead of tight crops because the context was more of the story, cropping motion to allow space to run into (but maybe not), level horizons (except when it's more interesting not), rule of thirds is probably the most violated rule it probably isn't even in the list.Mistake, or artistic choice? Experts disagree!
I do not suggest that the "rules" are wrong, but rather they are good guidance for most shots until the photographer reaches the point they decide it is better in some case to do otherwise.
Yeah, rules. Whose rules? When some rando on the Internet tells me to ignore what my boss is telling me to do and do it his way, guess what, I'm going to ignore that advice.I suggest that pointing out the "rules" is helpful. Arguing about them is not. Everyone has to find their path, and cropping wide for an editor to make choices is absolutely valid (and often requested).
You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-DHonestly, to some extent the only way we REALLY judge is which shots editors pick, and I remain so baffled by those choices some days I feel like the only rule is "take a bunch of random stuff because there's no way to tell what gets picked.
Did you have a very wide horizontal shot of that player? Vertical shots are very rarely used for articles...I have literally had sports editors take a vertical dunk shot in basketball (a good one, and star player), crop it very wide horizontally, and omit the ball and basket. OK, it showed the face, but ... really?
Linwood
He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D
I'm sure I did (I don't recall the game now so can't confirm). But they would have been floor shots, on a fast break or something similar. I have their standard aspect ratio and always include some in exactly that. The school goes by the moniker "Dunk City" so they are obsessed with dunks. The prior SID would, or ask me to, do a collage of dunks to fit the aspect with 3-4 players across.Did you have a very wide horizontal shot of that player? Vertical shots are very rarely used for articles...I have literally had sports editors take a vertical dunk shot in basketball (a good one, and star player), crop it very wide horizontally, and omit the ball and basket. OK, it showed the face, but ... really?
Linwood
Oh, this race didn't have any of those.He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D
A race with no fans?Oh, this race didn't have any of those.He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D
This gets to why they seldom charge admission (parking, sometimes). Championships do attract a crowd, but they're necessarily scattered across many acres, even if there's a scrum for the finishing chute (plan accordingly, those tapes stretch).A race with no fans?Oh, this race didn't have any of those.He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D

100%.My point is that if you consider who consumes your shots you learn something about how to crop, except sometimes you learn mysterious or even bad things as well. Like the OP's shot with the weird added artistic affect (at least in my opinion it was unhelpful).
Linwood
Yes. There were a handful of watchers along the course but the runners greatly outnumbered the spectators.A race with no fans?Oh, this race didn't have any of those.He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D
That is too bad. Here we get a lot of spectators for XC meets, both at the HS level and the college level.Yes. There were a handful of watchers along the course but the runners greatly outnumbered the spectators.A race with no fans?Oh, this race didn't have any of those.He probably meant fans cheering on the athletes and runners in front of fans/race signs...You know what's really funny? Ask them what kind of photos they want. I asked him what kind of photos he wanted for this and he told me, "atmospheric photos". I'm not sure what he meant so I figured I'd just make the backgrounds as blurry as possible. :-D
It's hard to get people to come to a hot humid park in the middle of a work day to watch two races that lasted an hour.That is too bad. Here we get a lot of spectators for XC meets, both at the HS level and the college level.Yes. There were a handful of watchers along the course but the runners greatly outnumbered the spectators.A race with no fans?
It would have been even hotter at 3:30PM.Most of our races start at 3:30-4:00 pm. Some of the big ones start at noon.
I got enough sweat and exercise that day hauling the 400mm f2.8 between three locations.Some courses have features that can make them more interesting, such as this course with a bridge the runners cross.
That is one thing that they deal with, the heat. There is a specific wet bulb temperature above which all sports can not happen so the schools tend to look at the forecast and will sometimes move the start time accordingly.It would have been even hotter at 3:30PM.Most of our races start at 3:30-4:00 pm. Some of the big ones start at noon.