Camera Matters -- Awards with cheap cameras - Found one!

Autonerd

Senior Member
Messages
3,519
Solutions
5
Reaction score
3,089
In the last Camera Matters thread, the question came up about whether a pro photographer ever won an award with a simple camera. I stumbled upon an example today: According to the New York Times, "..a photo of Al Gore on the stump that Mr. [David] Burnett took with a Holga won a top prize at the 2001 White House News Photographers' Association's Eyes of History contest."

Copy+of+OldNewGore.jpg


Here is David Burnett's Holga Eye gallery .

--
My Flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/aarongold/
 
Hello...

Interesting picture and link - I don't think there is anything wrong with cheap cameras. IHMO - :-)
In the last Camera Matters thread, the question came up about whether a pro photographer ever won an award with a simple camera. I stumbled upon an example today: According to the New York Times, "..a photo of Al Gore on the stump that Mr. [David] Burnett took with a Holga won a top prize at the 2001 White House News Photographers' Association's Eyes of History contest."

Copy+of+OldNewGore.jpg


Here is David Burnett's Holga Eye gallery .


--
Sue Anne Rush
 
Poor image! How that even won anything is a testament to low judging standards!

-M
It won because it was taken with a Holga. Had it been taken with a 'regular' camera, it wouldn't have won anything. There's something to be gleaned from that, methinks.

--
Any opinions I express are my own and do not represent DPReview. I'm just a regular poster unless explicitly stated otherwise in the body of the post.
 
Poor image! How that even won anything is a testament to low judging standards!

-M
It won because it was taken with a Holga. Had it been taken with a 'regular' camera, it wouldn't have won anything. There's something to be gleaned from that, methinks.
Something as simple as reframing the speaker before releasing the shutter, even though it is a Holga, would have had more impact.

-M
 
Do pinhole cameras count as cheap?

Here are 3 winners from a pinhole photography competition. Not sure the date.

 
So....99% of all cameras made before the year 2000?

f8d97e83e68d4640a3ea78967f6b2d7c.jpg.png
those cameras might be simple now but were not at all simple then and definately not cheap.

What you have there is the OM2 , one of the most advanced system cameras at the time. In 1980 it sold for $380 with a standard 50mm 1.8. That is about $1250 now.
 
Last edited:
Eamonn McCabe won News Photographer of the Year for photos some of which were taken with a compact camera (Canon SureShot ?) at the Heysel Stadium Disaster ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/ar...hing-heysel-football-disaster-changed-my-life - Warning: contains distressing images ) although he has said that it was an award he wished he’d never won.
My brother was there but not where the incident happened.

BTW, read the sign (the same was repeated in Italian on the other side)



26bb41e3aa49496aafed40f80ddf9c6f.jpg
 
Last edited:
It is probably due to the 99% human Genome compatibility between monkeys and humans.

I would like to see a Genome mapping of some photographers that post to here.
 
I just bought a Canon Elan II3 w/ eye AF and Tamron 28-200mm AF in mint condition today for $30(US) at a flea market. Was that camera a good buy(cheap)?
 
The photo has impact, composition is secondary.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top