How Important Is Having Two Memory Card Slots For You?

Krav Maga

Senior Member
Messages
3,758
Solutions
1
Reaction score
3,939
Location
UT, US
I'm just curious. For me, and I'm not a pro photographer, I think it's very important. Granted, I've never had a card failure, but they do and will fail if given enough time. Over the past 20 years, I've only had one catastrophic hard drive failure (thankfully I was backed up) but I still have redundancy built in to my computer system.

For pros, I'd think it would be an absolute necessity.

Thoughts?
 
Advance doesn't equal reliability. If advance = reliability major companies like google would not spend billions annually for backups and redundancies.
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots. As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!
Yes, that's a great strategy. Didn't say double card slots are without benefits. But if you had to choose between having a single body with two card slots or two bodies with single card which would you choose, given all possible failure scenarios?
That is introducing a false strawman choice.

A responsible professional would prefer two cameras with two slots.

I'm baffled by people who charge money for using one body and frequently change lenses. Not only is it annoying and misses shots, it also runs a risk for the client to have no backup.
 
Last edited:
There is no backup when using two cameras since no one is shooting them both at the same time. Two cameras allow for redundancy in case of incident and flexibility with lens.
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots. As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!
Yes, that's a great strategy. Didn't say double card slots are without benefits. But if you had to choose between having a single body with two card slots or two bodies with single card which would you choose, given all possible failure scenarios?
For me... If it were important images I only had one shot at capturing... 2 slots, of course. If it were images that could be recreated, then no preference.

But what you said was: "I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure.."

What we're saying is that you should have said "except" instead of "including". Because, in regard to the topic, pictures lost due to card failure cannot be saved by a 2nd, 3rd or even 10th camera. They're just lost.
if you shoot weddings, two cameras and two photographers is highly recommended.

but when i go hiking in spring to fall, i usually bring my infrared camera and my color camera with at least one lens for each camera. with a 150-600mm lens, this gets heavy hiking up hill. i could not imagine taking an extra color and an extra infrared camera due to weight, size, and cost.
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots. As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!
Yes, that's a great strategy. Didn't say double card slots are without benefits. But if you had to choose between having a single body with two card slots or two bodies with single card which would you choose, given all possible failure scenarios?
For me... If it were important images I only had one shot at capturing... 2 slots, of course. If it were images that could be recreated, then no preference.

But what you said was: "I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure.."

What we're saying is that you should have said "except" instead of "including". Because, in regard to the topic, pictures lost due to card failure cannot be saved by a 2nd, 3rd or even 10th camera. They're just lost.
if you shoot weddings, two cameras and two photographers is highly recommended.

but when i go hiking in spring to fall, i usually bring my infrared camera and my color camera with at least one lens for each camera. with a 150-600mm lens, this gets heavy hiking up hill. i could not imagine taking an extra color and an extra infrared camera due to weight, size, and cost.
If it is a job, then perhaps having an assistant carrying another camera set-up will work?

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
 
Yes, that's a great strategy. Didn't say double card slots are without benefits. But if you had to choose between having a single body with two card slots or two bodies with single card which would you choose, given all possible failure scenarios?
These two choices get you two different things. If you have a single body and it goes bad, then you lose the ability to take additional photos with that camera. But with the single card, if that goes bad then you lose all the photos you've shot up until that point.

Personally I think it's more painful to lose images that you've already shot because losing something you have is more painful than losing something you never had to begin with. This is backed up by science. In psychology, this is called loss aversion. Loss aversion refers to people's tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains. Loss aversion says that the pain of loss is greater than the joy of gaining something. Losses loom larger than gains.

Besides, if my camera went bad, at least I could still additional images with my smartphone.
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots.
You don't mean smart photographers in general, do you? I am guessing you mean certain professional photographers. I have done just fine with one one card and two two card cameras, used separately, my whole digital life. And, before that, a one roll of film camera. I have a preference for avoiding worst case scenario thinking or, as AE Neuman always said: What, me worry? I suppose that would change if I were preparing for battle.
As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!

4674017-Navy-SEALs-Quote-Two-is-one-one-is-none.jpg
--
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots.
You don't mean smart photographers in general, do you? I am guessing you mean certain professional photographers. I have done just fine with one one card and two two card cameras, used separately, my whole digital life. And, before that, a one roll of film camera. I have a preference for avoiding worst case scenario thinking or, as AE Neuman always said: What, me worry? I suppose that would change if I were preparing for battle.
There is one shoot I do that I do about 150 portraits.

I could swap out the SD Card throughout the day so that if an SD card got damaged, I would only miss a portion of the shots. And I guess I could then go back to the organization and tell them that I need to do certain portraits again because of a damaged SD card.

But . . . that would add complexity to my process. And if I have to go back to the organization because of a failed SD Card, it would be a pain in the butt. When it is so easy to simply shoot to dual cards.

And . . . sometimes I do a group shot of about 150-175 people in the shot.

If the SD card failed that had that shot on it, it would be next to impossible to get all those people to come back for a make-up shot.

Since I have 2 cameras with dual SD cards, it really is such a simple thing to shoot to two cards and reduce the chance of having to go through the pain of asking people back to take their pictures again.

It is such a simple thing to do.

I don't really understand why anyone is saying that they don't see the value in cameras with dual slots. LOL. :)

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!

4674017-Navy-SEALs-Quote-Two-is-one-one-is-none.jpg


--
My Personal Flickr Favs . . .

[FL][RP][LS][GC][51][ML][TMPM][ExifTool]
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots.
You don't mean smart photographers in general, do you? I am guessing you mean certain professional photographers. I have done just fine with one one card and two two card cameras, used separately, my whole digital life. And, before that, a one roll of film camera. I have a preference for avoiding worst case scenario thinking or, as AE Neuman always said: What, me worry? I suppose that would change if I were preparing for battle.
There is one shoot I do that I do about 150 portraits.

I could swap out the SD Card throughout the day so that if an SD card got damaged, I would only miss a portion of the shots. And I guess I could then go back to the organization and tell them that I need to do certain portraits again because of a damaged SD card.

But . . . that would add complexity to my process. And if I have to go back to the organization because of a failed SD Card, it would be a pain in the butt. When it is so easy to simply shoot to dual cards.

And . . . sometimes I do a group shot of about 150-175 people in the shot.

If the SD card failed that had that shot on it, it would be next to impossible to get all those people to come back for a make-up shot.

Since I have 2 cameras with dual SD cards, it really is such a simple thing to shoot to two cards and reduce the chance of having to go through the pain of asking people back to take their pictures again.

It is such a simple thing to do.

I don't really understand why anyone is saying that they don't see the value in cameras with dual slots. LOL. :)

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!

4674017-Navy-SEALs-Quote-Two-is-one-one-is-none.jpg
--
My Personal Flickr Favs . . .
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tacticdesigns/sets/72157631300869284/
[FL][RP][LS][GC][51][ML][TMPM][ExifTool]
If dual slot so important, it so be basic requirements of camera. Not only for pro camera. For example,travel/entry level camera should has dual slot. We can't ask someone go back to travel destination (especially oversea country) to take again travel photo 😭 if SD card damage.

Since dual slot (only mirroring backup to dual card) should be not much costing, dual slot should apply to all entry/medium range camera.
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots.
You don't mean smart photographers in general, do you? I am guessing you mean certain professional photographers. I have done just fine with one one card and two two card cameras, used separately, my whole digital life. And, before that, a one roll of film camera. I have a preference for avoiding worst case scenario thinking or, as AE Neuman always said: What, me worry? I suppose that would change if I were preparing for battle.
There is one shoot I do that I do about 150 portraits.

I could swap out the SD Card throughout the day so that if an SD card got damaged, I would only miss a portion of the shots. And I guess I could then go back to the organization and tell them that I need to do certain portraits again because of a damaged SD card.

But . . . that would add complexity to my process. And if I have to go back to the organization because of a failed SD Card, it would be a pain in the butt. When it is so easy to simply shoot to dual cards.

And . . . sometimes I do a group shot of about 150-175 people in the shot.

If the SD card failed that had that shot on it, it would be next to impossible to get all those people to come back for a make-up shot.

Since I have 2 cameras with dual SD cards, it really is such a simple thing to shoot to two cards and reduce the chance of having to go through the pain of asking people back to take their pictures again.

It is such a simple thing to do.

I don't really understand why anyone is saying that they don't see the value in cameras with dual slots. LOL. :)

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!

4674017-Navy-SEALs-Quote-Two-is-one-one-is-none.jpg
If dual slot so important, it so be basic requirements of camera. Not only for pro camera. For example,travel/entry level camera should has dual slot. We can't ask someone go back to travel destination (especially oversea country) to take again travel photo 😭 if SD card damage.

Since dual slot (only mirroring backup to dual card) should be not much costing, dual slot should apply to all entry/medium range camera.
If you deem it a good thing, it is nice if it is there.

I don't shoot dual card on everything.

Just mostly when I shoot for other people (either paid or volunteer) and I don't want to let them down.

For vacation, I am ok shooting single slot.

I'll shoot my Pentax Q, Nikon D5100, Canon S90 (when I still had it) or Fujifilm XP80.

None of those cameras have dual slots.

But . . . where possible, I back-up the shots each night to my laptop.

Last year, we took a vacation to California.

Each night when we got back to the hotel room, I'd pull the SD card from whatever camera I used that day and quickly back-up the pictures to the computer.

That way, if my camera got lost or stolen, I would still have a bunch of the pictures from our vacation. :)

I even backed-up the pictures to a pair of 64GB cards I brought.

So when we flew back home, I had multiple copies of all the vacation picts I took.

1. A set on my computer.

2. A set on a 64GB card in the 2nd slot of my Nikon D7000.

3. A set on a 64GB card in the back-up waterproof compact camera (Fujifilm XP50) that I took. And that was in my pocket.

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)

--
My Personal Flickr Favs . . .

[FL][RP][LS][GC][51][ML][TMPM][ExifTool]
 
The problem for me with this whole discussion is that most people who currently have cameras with dual slots DO NOT use them for redundant backup purposes. Lets leave out paid professionals (a minority in this thread), you see threads on sending RAW to one and jpg to another or doubling the amount of memory, etc.

Dual slots are a nice to have feature, less important than a second camera.

Since my film cameras, 10D, 5D, 60D, 7D, EOS M, 7DMKII and EOS M3 I have had 3 failures. Mirror fell out of 5D, water damage to 7D and internal SD card pins bent from forcing a card in the EOS M. Since the year 1979 and literally a million or more photos, the only images I have ever lost were the 3 times I forgot the memory card, the one time I forgot the roll of film and the time my granddaughter opened the back on my 35mm camera.

I wish I had as good a record with external hard drives...

Ben Boozer
Disagree without being disagreeable
 
Last edited:
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots. As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!
Yes, that's a great strategy. Didn't say double card slots are without benefits. But if you had to choose between having a single body with two card slots or two bodies with single card which would you choose, given all possible failure scenarios?
For me... If it were important images I only had one shot at capturing... 2 slots, of course. If it were images that could be recreated, then no preference.

But what you said was: "I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure.."

What we're saying is that you should have said "except" instead of "including". Because, in regard to the topic, pictures lost due to card failure cannot be saved by a 2nd, 3rd or even 10th camera. They're just lost.
if you shoot weddings, two cameras and two photographers is highly recommended.

but when i go hiking in spring to fall, i usually bring my infrared camera and my color camera with at least one lens for each camera. with a 150-600mm lens, this gets heavy hiking up hill. i could not imagine taking an extra color and an extra infrared camera due to weight, size, and cost.
If it is a job, then perhaps having an assistant carrying another camera set-up will work?

Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
I get paid for weddings and portrait shoots once in a while, but mostly i shoot for fun. I do have friends and family help me carry tripods, lenses, and camera bags :)

sometimes, i go to an Open Space on the way home. I always carry my camera and most lenses with me. you don't always know when you'll need it.
 
It's important if your life or livelihood depends on 100% reliability. For casual photography it is not important. A single card slot is enough.
not for me. If I'm on a rare trip or vacation and there's a rare shot, i want (not need) a backup card.

The second time this happened to me was on a Sony A7ii. it wasn't just put in a new card. There was some weird firmware bug where i was getting the error message that it couldn't read to the current card, then the same error to a new card. It took about 20 minutes to figure out I had to take out the card, the battery, then wait a few minutes, then try it with the new card and battery back in the camera.

I was in another state, on a special trip when this happened. I was able to recover some of the photos from the card, but the card was bad.
 
It's important if your life or livelihood depends on 100% reliability. For casual photography it is not important. A single card slot is enough.
not for me. If I'm on a rare trip or vacation and there's a rare shot, i want (not need) a backup card.
What's important to you is not what's important to me. Having photographs of a rare trip with 100% insurance is not important to me enough to have a camera with dual slots.
The second time this happened to me was on a Sony A7ii. it wasn't just put in a new card. There was some weird firmware bug where i was getting the error message that it couldn't read to the current card, then the same error to a new card. It took about 20 minutes to figure out I had to take out the card, the battery, then wait a few minutes, then try it with the new card and battery back in the camera.

I was in another state, on a special trip when this happened. I was able to recover some of the photos from the card, but the card was bad.
 
I'm just curious. For me, and I'm not a pro photographer, I think it's very important. Granted, I've never had a card failure, but they do and will fail if given enough time. Over the past 20 years, I've only had one catastrophic hard drive failure (thankfully I was backed up) but I still have redundancy built in to my computer system.

For pros, I'd think it would be an absolute necessity.

Thoughts?
As an amateur, two card slots in my camera is not important at all. Granted, I don't work all that hard for a shot. Perhaps if you depend upon selling your photos to pay the rent, it may become an issue, or to have jpegs on one and raws on the other - mostly for convenience, it might be useful. I think only once have I totally filled up a card, and as always, I had a spare. Yes, I download and format after each shoot, so it just ain't that big a deal to me. YMMV.

Peace.

John
 
So, how do you feel about it? If it's important shooting (for me)I allways use more than one body as it covers a lot more fail scenarios including a single card failure..
A second camera doesn't cover a single-card failure.
Nope, but with a bit of planning with two bodies you are not totally screwed..
Unless you are constantly alternating cameras when shooting critical moments, yes you are screwed.
People keep saying "just use 2 bodies", but inconvenience aside... it's simply not a solution in any way.
Many ways..
If the card fails in a single-slot camera, your second body doesn't suddenly have all those images you just lost.

The card in a second slot would. You could have 10 cameras but if a card fails, those images are gone.
And the single camera overheats, has bad (spare) battery or frozes in cold, c****y sensor being the most common faults. Even camera failures as shutter failure are as propable causes as memory card failures. When that single camera fails you even if it has 10 card slots what you do?
Smart photographers always have two cameras on them, each with dual card slots.
You don't mean smart photographers in general, do you? I am guessing you mean certain professional photographers. I have done just fine with one one card and two two card cameras, used separately, my whole digital life. And, before that, a one roll of film camera. I have a preference for avoiding worst case scenario thinking or, as AE Neuman always said: What, me worry? I suppose that would change if I were preparing for battle.
There is one shoot I do that I do about 150 portraits.

I could swap out the SD Card throughout the day so that if an SD card got damaged, I would only miss a portion of the shots. And I guess I could then go back to the organization and tell them that I need to do certain portraits again because of a damaged SD card.

But . . . that would add complexity to my process. And if I have to go back to the organization because of a failed SD Card, it would be a pain in the butt. When it is so easy to simply shoot to dual cards.

And . . . sometimes I do a group shot of about 150-175 people in the shot.

If the SD card failed that had that shot on it, it would be next to impossible to get all those people to come back for a make-up shot.

Since I have 2 cameras with dual SD cards, it really is such a simple thing to shoot to two cards and reduce the chance of having to go through the pain of asking people back to take their pictures again.

It is such a simple thing to do.

I don't really understand why anyone is saying that they don't see the value in cameras with dual slots. LOL. :)
Smart photographers know their own needs. Whether that is one camera with one slot or two with two. I don't know anyone who thinks two card slot cameras shouldn't exist. Or don't see the value. Just not everyone needs two cameras with two card slots for what they do.
Take care & Happy Shooting!
:)
As the saying goes, "Two is one, one is none" (often used by the Navy SEALs). It means if you only have one of something, it's as good as having none (if that one item goes down). So you need two of everything, whether it be a weapons, or cameras, or memory cards. If you have a single camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single memory card in your camera and it goes bad, you're toast. If you have a single gun and it goes bad, you're toast. You need redundancy! Two is one, one is none!

4674017-Navy-SEALs-Quote-Two-is-one-one-is-none.jpg
--
My Personal Flickr Favs . . .
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tacticdesigns/sets/72157631300869284/
[FL][RP][LS][GC][51][ML][TMPM][ExifTool]


--
 
My Olympus C-7070WZ has two slots, and I have a 512MB CF card and 1GB xD card in it. I used the camera for 14 years and never had to take out a card.

Last week I bought an Olympus E-M1 mk2 and it also has two card slots, one UHS-II SD card slot and one UHS-I SD card slot. I could have gotten one 256GB V60 UHS-II card for both video and photos, or I could have gotten a 128GB V60 UHS-II card primarily for video along with a 128GB V30 UHS-I card primarily for photos and easily switch between them with just the press of a button. Spend $238 CAD total for one card or spend $132 CAD total for two cards. It wasn't a hard decision. And there are a lot more 128GB cards to choose from compared to 256GB as well. 256GB V60 UHS-II cards are very hard to find.

I don't think the flexibility and convenience of two card slots can be completely ignored even if it is a minor thing. Surely the amount that a second slot adds to the cost of a camera is minor too. E-M5 mk3 only costs $100 CAD less than E-M1 mk2 in Canada right now. So save $100 CAD on the camera to spend $106 CAD more on storage. Does that make sense?
 
My Olympus C-7070WZ has two slots, and I have a 512MB CF card and 1GB xD card in it. I used the camera for 14 years and never had to take out a card.

Last week I bought an Olympus E-M1 mk2 and it also has two card slots, one UHS-II SD card slot and one UHS-I SD card slot. I could have gotten one 256GB V60 UHS-II card for both video and photos, or I could have gotten a 128GB V60 UHS-II card primarily for video along with a 128GB V30 UHS-I card primarily for photos and easily switch between them with just the press of a button. Spend $238 CAD total for one card or spend $132 CAD total for two cards. It wasn't a hard decision. And there are a lot more 128GB cards to choose from compared to 256GB as well. 256GB V60 UHS-II cards are very hard to find.

I don't think the flexibility and convenience of two card slots can be completely ignored even if it is a minor thing. Surely the amount that a second slot adds to the cost of a camera is minor too. E-M5 mk3 only costs $100 CAD less than E-M1 mk2 in Canada right now. So save $100 CAD on the camera to spend $106 CAD more on storage. Does that make sense?
Second card should not add too much cost except different model has different chip. CPU/chip control the slot. Price different just marketing decision.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top