jets are dogs to fly , try something a bit more agileI already did...it's below.you know im going to post a video to end this whole debate once and for all dont you
try a fast runner or even a quick 3d plane and track that better still a mod 3.5 turn 1/10 touring car that can hit 100k in 30 meters from a standing startjets are dogs to fly , try something a bit more agileI already did...it's below.you know im going to post a video to end this whole debate once and for all dont you
Don
nope and i have no intention of doing sohave you flown a racing drone ?panning test, this was taken with a Nikon 1 V2 a few years ago, nothing is cropped and is probably 10/15fps, i had no problem keeping up with a jet aircraft and filling the frame, i can do this with OVF and EVF but i don't shoot bursts anymore, i don't multiple shots of the same thing.
a gif i made of the images, if you can't do this with an EVF it's your technique
Don
We don't need a video to see that you posted a link then argued against what it says when someone quoted from it, loli will post a video soon then we will all see what really happensSo you post a link, someone quotes from it, and you argue that your link is wrong. Lol..no it doesnt just record your monitor and look at the rear lcd and the monitor at the same time. and you will see their is practically NOOOOOOO lag"Please note that this measures the shutter lag in the most general sense, including the viewfinder and (most importantly) you".....https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
You have to see how funny that is.
And whatever speed you claim to have achieved when photographing your timer, this is not EVF lag, no matter how many times you say it.
I think the problem is... you constantly argue against DSLRs (due to your misguided, insecure elitism) even when you have no clue what the topic is.
a lot of people argue for either side, both are more than useable to get great results so i don't see what the problem is, i have preferences but i do use both types of viewfinderWe don't need a video to see that you posted a link then argued against what it says when someone quoted from it, loli will post a video soon then we will all see what really happensSo you post a link, someone quotes from it, and you argue that your link is wrong. Lol..no it doesnt just record your monitor and look at the rear lcd and the monitor at the same time. and you will see their is practically NOOOOOOO lag"Please note that this measures the shutter lag in the most general sense, including the viewfinder and (most importantly) you".....https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
You have to see how funny that is.
And whatever speed you claim to have achieved when photographing your timer, this is not EVF lag, no matter how many times you say it.
I think the problem is... you constantly argue against DSLRs (due to your misguided, insecure elitism) even when you have no clue what the topic is.
And how is a video is going to disprove EVF lag ?!
I know how important the whole mirrorless vs DSLR thing is to you, since you invest your life arguing about it, but c'mon dude. Think!
sorry i forgot you own sloooow cameras."Please note that this measures the shutter lag in the most general sense, including the viewfinder and (most importantly) you".....https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
Don
i have one at 1.90sorry i forgot you own sloooow cameras."Please note that this measures the shutter lag in the most general sense, including the viewfinder and (most importantly) you".....https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
Don
I was a bit trigger happy . Tomorrow I’m going to shoot a 60 frame video wth my em52 with my em12 shooting the screen and see what the actual evf lag is. wish I didn’t have to work so much I’m missing out on all the fun and experiments. A mate shoots birds with a v15 pf300 he loves it and his images are first class. He prefers it over his d500 with a 300 vr2 2.8.now your full of it, because i fly as well and the mod cars flog any plane from a standing start. if evf was that much of a problem how do they fly competition drones ?
I'm confused ...
lost me to, and look how crap the auto focus was. i think he needs to use a pro mirror-less. a blind man could have focused better.
I have three planes that can reach 60mph in between 1 and 2 seconds from a standing start. One of them is even a float plane.
Notably, they crash a lot and also notably they pay a ton of attention to lag in the system.
Yeah, and the lag-free sequence has far superior tracking with the plane virtually dead center the entire time, while the video has the planes all over the frame.
For the second time in a week I've found myself referring to the famous statement attributed to Thomas Cardinal Wolsey, "Be very, very careful what you put in that head, because you will never, ever get it out."For the thousandth time, shutter lag is not related to EVF lag.https://www.zoul.cz/shutter-lag/ my finger to image capture was .17 em12 by the way their is virtually no evf lag. lets see how good you dslr users are
Don
Geeze, I could have taught a brain-damaged rat this simple fact by now.
don
