Using a variable ND Filter on the 16-55

verheyph

Leading Member
Messages
827
Solutions
1
Reaction score
731
Location
Brussels, BE
Hello,

I'm testing long exposure with my 16-55 on a XT3 This is what I get when rotating the filter (quite pricey) at is maximum (-8). It seems to be a kind of "irregular reverse vignetting). Could anyone understand what's going on ?

Thanks

fa4e0d227bbe4322956e70b765aec2f2.jpg

--
Cheers - Philippe
 
Last edited:
Solution
Use of a variable ND should really only be used for video or when you only need to cut down a stop or two of light. Long exposure should utilize a regular ND filter. Depending on how long you're going, somewhere between 3-8 stops. A variable ND filter is essentially just two polarized filters together so when you use them anywhere past half their tolerance you start to get that X. I should note that there are some new variable ND's that have figured out how to lessen or eliminate this but they are several hundred dollars.
Hello,

I'm testing long exposure with my 16-55 on a XT3 This is what I get when rotating the filter (quite pricey) at is maximum (-8). It seems to be a kind of "reverse vignetting). Could anyone understand what's going on ?

Thanks

fa4e0d227bbe4322956e70b765aec2f2.jpg
Normal, google it!
 
That's typical for v.ND's when tuned towards the extreme end of density.
 
Use of a variable ND should really only be used for video or when you only need to cut down a stop or two of light. Long exposure should utilize a regular ND filter. Depending on how long you're going, somewhere between 3-8 stops. A variable ND filter is essentially just two polarized filters together so when you use them anywhere past half their tolerance you start to get that X. I should note that there are some new variable ND's that have figured out how to lessen or eliminate this but they are several hundred dollars.
 
Solution

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top