Birdingbilly
Well-known member
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 209
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes wobbling off putting wonder if this is due to the no blackout showing previous frame at 20 FPS ,also my omd em1 mk2 often shows sharp images in viewfinder in c-af only to find when examined closely they are not sharp ,Three things he said are a worry for me and may push me to wait on this until more people have reviewed it.
1) He said that during C-AF with DfD active, the viewfinder "wobbled" a lot and he could not tell if his shot was in focus. I don't find this happening with my Pen F, though I admit I usually use S-AF as the Pen's C-AF is pretty much useless.
he said 4 stops on the 75mm2) He said that he measured the IBIS as 5 to 5.5 stops with Panasonic Dual IS lenses, but only 3 stops with a non-Panasonic lens. Now I do have a few Panasonic lenses (the Leica 8-18 and 12-60) which are my go to lenses, but I use the Olympus 75-300ii for a long tele and get 4 to 5 stops on the Pen. Do I need to spend the $1700 on the Leica 100-400 to get the better IBIS?
3) He wasn't really clear on if he thinks this is better at sports/action than the E-M1ii, which has the PDAF on chip. I tend to think that the Olympus would be a bit faster, but not necessarily any more accurate, but I did not get any real idea from him.
These are all issues that I would like to figure out before making a $1700 purchase...
That should be good news.Looks like you CAN power camera with external battery.
With all features from G9 in a range finder body. Hopefully Panasonic haven’t cut the GX single digit line.
I would take what the rep says with a grain of salt. They are paid to talk up the camera, not give an unbiased opinion. I appreciate people like Gordon Laing as they are independent and tell it like it is.Great news here. I commented on his first part 1 of 3, but cited Ben Fix's discussion with a Panasonic rep. See this videoat 14:14
http://www.flickr.com/marcram
http://marcstephenramirez.blogspot.com/
+1With all features from G9 in a range finder body. Hopefully Panasonic haven’t cut the GX single digit line.
--
Blog: haozhexu.me
Instagram: instagram.com/haozhe.xu
With all features from G9 in a range finder body. Hopefully Panasonic haven’t cut the GX single digit line.
Yeah, I've come to admit this with some resignation.I wouldn't want a GX9 any smaller either. It's about the perfect size I think, and I've got fairly small hands for a bloke.But maybe things are getting a tad crowded in their lineup at this point. I really hope there's a GX9, and at this point I actually hope it doesn't get significantly smaller - ever since I realised that a large part of the reason it handles so well is actually partly an aspect of the size.With all features from G9 in a range finder body. Hopefully Panasonic haven’t cut the GX single digit line.
--
Blog: haozhexu.me
Instagram: instagram.com/haozhe.xu

I would take what the rep says with a grain of salt. They are paid to talk up the camera, not give an unbiased opinion. I appreciate people like Gordon Laing as they are independent and tell it like it is.Great news here. I commented on his first part 1 of 3, but cited Ben Fix's discussion with a Panasonic rep. See this videoat 14:14
http://www.flickr.com/marcram
http://marcstephenramirez.blogspot.com/
--
Richard M. Poniarski
Not a speaker for anyone but myself.
"Everyone is entitled to the reality of their own choice"