Wave forest
Forum Enthusiast
- Messages
- 356
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 169
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OP, nice photo!
Post-processing, yes; if you look at the histogram for your original pic, it doesn't even touch the right side - that means underexposed [for a daytime image.] There are areas in that image that are dark enough to appear empty black, when in fact there is color and detail there that just hasn't been made visible, hence range, as in dynamic range; the amount of detail your camera captured in very dark and very bright areas of your composition but isn't represented in the final image because exposure is too high or low. After bumping up exposure and making sure the histogram touches both sides, the full detail and contrast/color your camera is capable of was revealed.I need some education that I wasn't able to follow your conversation. Are you talking about post-processing? It is a OOC JPEG and I trimmed away the messy surroundings. The blurred background came from the big aperture an closeness to the subject.
Post-processing, yes; if you look at the histogram for your original pic, it doesn't even touch the right side - that means underexposed [for a daytime image.] There are areas in that image that are dark enough to appear empty black, when in fact there is color and detail there that just hasn't been made visible, hence range, as in dynamic range; the amount of detail your camera captured in very dark and very bright areas of your composition but isn't represented in the final image because exposure is too high or low. After bumping up exposure and making sure the histogram touches both sides, the full detail and contrast/color your camera is capable of was revealed.I need some education that I wasn't able to follow your conversation. Are you talking about post-processing? It is a OOC JPEG and I trimmed away the messy surroundings. The blurred background came from the big aperture an closeness to the subject.
From what I see here by others, I encourage you to eventually try and learn good Post Processing software. If you like it, you will probably learn to shoot RAW, and gain enough skill to both improve and customize to preference your images.Do you have any good, free and easy-to-use post-processing software to recommend? I travel a lot and only do minimum PP with Windows 10 Photo Editor. Never read histogram.
The histogram tells you what will and won't be exposed before you take the picture; a rather important tool if you want something more accurate than "eyeballing it" to expose your pics.Do you have any good, free and easy-to-use post-processing software to recommend? I travel a lot and only do minimum PP with Windows 10 Photo Editor. Never read histogram.
The histogram tells you what will and won't be exposed before you take the picture; a rather important tool if you want something more accurate than "eyeballing it" to expose your pics.Do you have any good, free and easy-to-use post-processing software to recommend? I travel a lot and only do minimum PP with Windows 10 Photo Editor. Never read histogram.
The full software suite used by the pros, Adobe Lightroom/Photoshop, is ten bucks a month.
Good shot! Slight underexposure partially due to the -0.3 EV setting. Decent blurring of the background and the darkness of the background helps. You ask about software to post process your photos. I recommend Photoshop Elements. Version 14 can now be had for around $50.

Good shot! Slight underexposure partially due to the -0.3 EV setting. Decent blurring of the background and the darkness of the background helps. You ask about software to post process your photos. I recommend Photoshop Elements. Version 14 can now be had for around $50.
I downloaded your original and SoCalWill's original and also used Photoshop Element with Auto Smart Fix on Your original. I took screenshots of the histograms of each. and in Elements I made circular selections of the blossom in each photo and then took screenshots of the histogram of each selection. Every thing was put together on the composite below.
Let's look at the original on the left. The histogram of the entire photo indicates extreme underexposure however the histogram of the blossom and part of the bee indicates moderate underexposure. If you treasure the background which you were trying to blur out then you need greater exposure. I find the original quite acceptable for display on a screen although it would probably need lightening for a print.
The center photo using Auto Smart Fix also is under exposed overall. The histogram for the blossom (you should look at an enlarged version to see the selected area) now extends all the way to the right and indicates that the blossom has been lightened. The background is lighter but still controlled. I consider the very good for screen viewing.
SoCalWill's photo on the left overall has a nicely centered histogram extending from left to right. The blossom has been lightened considerably. I consider this a bit too bright for screen use and also feel that the background is now intruding as far a screen use is concerned, but I suspect it would be the best of the three for a print.
You really should have a program for post processing especially if you plan to print. Gimp is supposed to be a good open source alternative to Photoshop. It is free. I downloaded it and began downloading the instruction manual. This manual would put a Sony PDF manual to shame. At least 16 chapters, each with numerous subchapters each of which needed to be downloaded separately. I have a satellite internet connection and in 8 hours I managed to download 3 chapters. I decided that I couldn't afford to save any more money and ordered Photoshop elements and a book to go with the program.
--
bottom=bottomdollar
www.bottomdollar.us
www.cdhs.us
www.alaskawildflowers.us