Jonneymendoza2
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,099
- Reaction score
- 575
A troll that owns a load of canon glass and bodies?
Im not blinded my a brand i shoot with and i am fully aware of its shortcoming.
get off your high horse and open your eyes.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Im not blinded my a brand i shoot with and i am fully aware of its shortcoming.
get off your high horse and open your eyes.
Jonneymendoza2
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,099
- Reaction score
- 575
There are many scenarios for a landscaper to shoot high ISO.
Jesus. some of you guys will defend everything canon laps infront of you. They could have released the 5dsr wityh just ISO 100 and you would still say exact same thing.
If this is how most of the canon shooters act then no wonder why Canon dont try harder in each iteration of there bodies.
R
rrccad
Guest
there's very few instances of needing to shoot past 6400 for landscape.
and if you did .. DR isn't a problem.
the only relevant lacking area of DR with with 5Ds is really under ISO 400 or so.
Last edited:
Jonathan Brady
Veteran Member
Hey... I criticize Canon as much (probably more) than most people. Unlike some though, I don't criticize because I'm in love with another brand. To me, a criticism or complaint should only be levied when you think someone (or company, or whatever) can do better, and isn't. I've been in various customer service oriented roles my entire life and I always view a complaint as a compliment. It's a customer saying "not only would I like you to do better, I think you CAN do better".
The ISO 6400 limit is a minor annoyance at best (for me) - anything higher would be pushed in camera anyway, and I can do that just as easily myself with the RAW.
I guess if you shoot high ISO jpegs all the time it could be a major inconvenience , but to me it's just a dumb arbitrary thing that Canon put in that rates a "oh well" at best.
R
rrccad
Guest
more info:
sensor is 30.4MP (now that seems legit)
4K is 4:2:2 at 500mbps MJPEG (same as the 1DC and 1Dx Mark II)
FPS is 7fps ( a bit of a letdown I was thinking 8-10)
so known specs:
Nothing yet about the "unique feature"
sensor is 30.4MP (now that seems legit)
4K is 4:2:2 at 500mbps MJPEG (same as the 1DC and 1Dx Mark II)
FPS is 7fps ( a bit of a letdown I was thinking 8-10)
so known specs:
- 30.4mp
- 7fps
- Compact Flash/SD Card Slots (No CFast)
- Built-in Wifi
- 24/30fps @ 4K
- 60fps @ 1080
- 120fps @ 720
- 4:2:2
- 8bit 500mbps MJPEG
- USB 3
- Cable release port moved to the front of the camera where the “Mark XX” badge was.
- A lot more touchscreen functionality than the EOS-1D X Mark II
- Other ergonomic changes, such as a new “locking switch” on the rear of the camera.
Nothing yet about the "unique feature"
Last edited:
Jonneymendoza2
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,099
- Reaction score
- 575
Umm i would have liked it to be faster. Maybe I should get the 1dx mk2
R
rrccad
Guest
same.
however .. it's amusing.. it will be the fastest full frame non pro (1 series or 5x series) camera from nikon or canon.
and I'm disappointed.
Jonneymendoza2
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,099
- Reaction score
- 575
Yup agreed. I think they did that on purpose for obvious reasons. Don't cannibalise the 1dxmk2
R
rrccad
Guest
I honestly doubt it.. I have yet to see where canon actually cares.
I suspect more for battery life.
both the 1DX and the 5Ds aren't really known for battery performance.
R
rrccad
Guest
DPAF sensor was confirmed by CW..
CR also now has a larger photo:
*UPDATED* Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Specifications & Image - Canon Rumors
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works. Latest updates to this post are in bold. A different source has added new specifications. We're pretty confident in their validity. Below is the latest we've been told about the upcoming Canon...
www.canonrumors.com
forensics..
Loading…
fotoforensics.com
Last edited:
Jonneymendoza2
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,099
- Reaction score
- 575
The 1dx is known to have the best battery life. it has double the battery capacity.
I think that if the fps was close to 10fps, it would affect the sales of the 1dx2.
R
rrccad
Guest
the 1Dx Mark II certainly does not when compared to the competition.
1,210 shots CIPA rating is pretty bad considering the size of the battery.
so what if it affects the sales of the 1Dx Mark II .. i doubt canon makes any less profit margin on the 1Dx versus the 5d series.
there has been no credible statements from canon or anywhere that canon considers that a problem.
Last edited:
PhotoKhan
Forum Pro
R
rrccad
Guest
it is less than I wanted, but perhaps they wanted to improve on the 5Ds's 700 CIPA rating.
PhotoKhan
Forum Pro
It's not a question of what we wanted it's just that they closely tag competition and the D750 makes 6.5 fps at 24Mp and its 2 years old.
It is also just a single fps from the 5DMKIII whereas, with this one the jump was 2.1 fps from version II.
It just does not make sense...
PK
--
“Loose praise may feed my ego but constructive criticism advances my skills”
************************************************************
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.humbertoborgesfotografia.com/
http://www.pbase.com/photokhan
(PBase Supporter)
-------------------------------------------------
Last edited:
Jonathan Brady
Veteran Member
Sharlin
Leading Member
- Messages
- 745
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 633
Yep, indeed. 8fps would have been realistic if the resolution had been 24Mpix. Maaaaybe even 28Mpix. But at 30Mpix 7fps is a sensible number from the bandwidth and buffer size point of view.It makes complete sense to me!
I've been saying for at least a month if not two that 7 frames per second is where this camera would come in, in my opinion. It's half of the framerate of the 1dx Mark II just like the 5D Mark 3 is half the framerate of the 1dx. In terms of specifications and usability it is an increase over the previous model and increases the usability of the camera in various situations without infringing too closely upon other lines. I conceded that 8 frames per second was possible but I literally laughed out loud at the people who suggested 9 frames per second and the people suggesting 10 frames per second I thought were absolutely out of their minds.
R
rrccad
Guest
well going by bandwith no.Yep, indeed. 8fps would have been realistic if the resolution had been 24Mpix. Maaaaybe even 28Mpix. But at 30Mpix 7fps is a sensible number from the bandwidth and buffer size point of view.It makes complete sense to me!
I've been saying for at least a month if not two that 7 frames per second is where this camera would come in, in my opinion. It's half of the framerate of the 1dx Mark II just like the 5D Mark 3 is half the framerate of the 1dx. In terms of specifications and usability it is an increase over the previous model and increases the usability of the camera in various situations without infringing too closely upon other lines. I conceded that 8 frames per second was possible but I literally laughed out loud at the people who suggested 9 frames per second and the people suggesting 10 frames per second I thought were absolutely out of their minds.
5ds is 250MP/sec = 8.33 fps and that's with DiGiC 5+'s
unless canon is now 16 bit raw
Last edited:
Rick Knepper
Forum Pro
This shouldn't be the case, however, it looks like it could be. Since I've been in sales and marketing nearly my entire adult life, I'd say this about any company releasing a product that does not match or beat the competition in key categories or doesn't smoke the price of the competitor's offering.