This is not out if ignorance. The text on the lens has been removed :-D
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you believe the image was meant to depict a Nikon camera?This is not out if ignorance. The text on the lens has been removed :-D
Too many Nikon fora. I couldn't choose which one to pickI hope you posted this in one of the Nikon forums, just for a giggle![]()
This is amusing, of course, but I'm actually more than a bit surprised that the ad agency who created this poster would be so sloppy, or cavalier, about using a current camera made by one of their client's competitors in the ad. That's guaranteed to make your client really unhappy when it's eventually brought to their attention, as it inevitably will be.This is not out if ignorance. The text on the lens has been removed :-D
I do not belive the intention was to make the ad suggest it is depicting a NIkon camera. Quite to the contrary. They wanted to show a camera other than Nikon. Suggesting that the makers of other brands of cameras also use Nikon spectacle glasses.This is amusing, of course, but I'm actually more than a bit surprised that the ad agency who created this poster would be so sloppy, or cavalier, about using a current camera made by one of their client's competitors in the ad. That's guaranteed to make your client really unhappy when it's eventually brought to their attention, as it inevitably will be.This is not out if ignorance. The text on the lens has been removed :-D
Of course, someone in Nikon Europe's (or Nikon U.K.'s) opthalmic division approved the ad, so they will be in for a big sh&tstorm, too. But if you're the agency, you're 100% responsible for not making mistakes like this.
I just don't see how that could be the case. This is an ad for Nikon spectacle lenses, to be used in opticians' shops. How could they expect normal people shopping for glasses or passing on the street to know that an unlabeled niche camera partially cut off by the framing is actually a Fuji? Doesn't make any sense. That would be the most obscure ad message I've ever seen.I do not belive the intention was to make the ad suggest it is depicting a NIkon camera. Quite to the contrary. They wanted to show a camera other than Nikon. Suggesting that the makers of other brands of cameras also use Nikon spectacle glasses.
That's ok, we are all different.I just don't see how that could be the case.I do not belive the intention was to make the ad suggest it is depicting a NIkon camera. Quite to the contrary. They wanted to show a camera other than Nikon. Suggesting that the makers of other brands of cameras also use Nikon spectacle glasses.
No it doesn't.This is an ad for Nikon spectacle lenses, to be used in opticians' shops. How could they expect normal people shopping for glasses or passing on the street to know that an unlabeled niche camera partially cut off by the framing is actually a Fuji? Doesn't make any sense.
I think it's pretty persuasive to suggest that people of other companies engaged in the optics business wear Nikon branded spectacles.That would be the most obscure ad message I've ever seen.
I also don't see how anybody in the ad business would think that a message implying that employees of other camera companies use Nikon eyeglass lenses would have any persuasive strength at all. Who would care? Again, way, way, way too obscure.
As above.I'm not exactly sure what this ad is trying to say, actually.
If they wanted to suggest they were depicting a Nikon camera they would have done so with the Nikon brand name being all over it.It's really weak advertising messaging, to say the least. But it seems to me most likely that the idea behind this ad was to suggest Nikon's heritage as a camera company and try to leverage that brand reputation by tying it to Nikon's eyeglass lens products.
Obviously this ad works differently for different people. I looked at it for 2 seconds and thought the message was clear. I thought it was pretty clever, and never understood what the fuss was about.Unfortunately, they messed it all up pretty badly.
That's ok, we are all different.I just don't see how that could be the case.I do not belive the intention was to make the ad suggest it is depicting a NIkon camera. Quite to the contrary. They wanted to show a camera other than Nikon. Suggesting that the makers of other brands of cameras also use Nikon spectacle glasses.
No it doesn't.This is an ad for Nikon spectacle lenses, to be used in opticians' shops. How could they expect normal people shopping for glasses or passing on the street to know that an unlabeled niche camera partially cut off by the framing is actually a Fuji? Doesn't make any sense.
People looking at the ad are not expected to know it's a Fuji camera. It's a camera other than Nikon. If the creators wanted to suggest it was a Nikon camera they would have shown one.
I think it's pretty persuasive to suggest that people of other companies engaged in the optics business wear Nikon branded spectacles.That would be the most obscure ad message I've ever seen.
I also don't see how anybody in the ad business would think that a message implying that employees of other camera companies use Nikon eyeglass lenses would have any persuasive strength at all. Who would care? Again, way, way, way too obscure.
As above.I'm not exactly sure what this ad is trying to say, actually.
If they wanted to suggest they were depicting a Nikon camera they would have done so with the Nikon brand name being all over it.It's really weak advertising messaging, to say the least. But it seems to me most likely that the idea behind this ad was to suggest Nikon's heritage as a camera company and try to leverage that brand reputation by tying it to Nikon's eyeglass lens products.
Obviously this ad works differently for different people. I looked at it for 2 seconds and thought the message was clear. I thought it was pretty clever, and never understood what the fuss was about.Unfortunately, they messed it all up pretty badly.
It never occurred to me that camera was intended to be a Nikon camera.
That's ok, we are all different.I just don't see how that could be the case.I do not belive the intention was to make the ad suggest it is depicting a NIkon camera. Quite to the contrary. They wanted to show a camera other than Nikon. Suggesting that the makers of other brands of cameras also use Nikon spectacle glasses.
No it doesn't.This is an ad for Nikon spectacle lenses, to be used in opticians' shops. How could they expect normal people shopping for glasses or passing on the street to know that an unlabeled niche camera partially cut off by the framing is actually a Fuji? Doesn't make any sense.
People looking at the ad are not expected to know it's a Fuji camera. It's a camera other than Nikon. If the creators wanted to suggest it was a Nikon camera they would have shown one.
I think it's pretty persuasive to suggest that people of other companies engaged in the optics business wear Nikon branded spectacles.That would be the most obscure ad message I've ever seen.
I also don't see how anybody in the ad business would think that a message implying that employees of other camera companies use Nikon eyeglass lenses would have any persuasive strength at all. Who would care? Again, way, way, way too obscure.
As above.I'm not exactly sure what this ad is trying to say, actually.
If they wanted to suggest they were depicting a Nikon camera they would have done so with the Nikon brand name being all over it.It's really weak advertising messaging, to say the least. But it seems to me most likely that the idea behind this ad was to suggest Nikon's heritage as a camera company and try to leverage that brand reputation by tying it to Nikon's eyeglass lens products.
Obviously this ad works differently for different people. I looked at it for 2 seconds and thought the message was clear. I thought it was pretty clever, and never understood what the fuss was about.Unfortunately, they messed it all up pretty badly.
It never occurred to me that camera was intended to be a Nikon camera.
IMO: The Nikon logo is for the spectacles it advertises. The heritage is anybody's.heritage : anything that has been transmitted from the past or handed down by tradition.
Thats what the Nikon logo next to the camera was to show. The ad company just used a stock photo . thinking it was a Nikon. Mixups happen. IMO
LOL! Are they even Nikon glasses? :-DFunny. Looks like the ad agency just used a stock photo: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-286248527/stock-photo-camera-glasses-and-notepad-on-wood.html
On second thought, this ad may have very little to do with Nikon.LOL! Are they even Nikon glasses? :-DFunny. Looks like the ad agency just used a stock photo: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-286248527/stock-photo-camera-glasses-and-notepad-on-wood.html
I'm one of them. I have 2 Fujis, the X-M1 & the X-T10 and my eyeglass lenses are Nikon.It implicitly suggests that even Fuji camera people wear Nikon spectacle glasses.
Which by they way may well be true for some of them.