Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only thing missing is IBIS.Let's get this thread started. I'll probably upgrade to the A6300 in due course, but it's not an immediate trigger pull for me.
I'm not entirely sure, but it appears to be missing some compelling feature sets:
What else?
- IBIS?
- 1080p 120fps?
- Touch screen?
Agreed. It was a weakness in the NEX-3, NEX-5N, NEX-6, NEX-7 and a6000 (owned them all). I'd like to see an improvement as I do alot of shooting of low light cityscapes and got tired of manually focusing or using DMF which isn't always reliable.Low light AF for me is the biggest weakness of my A6000. All the new features I see on the A6300 are things I don't really care about.
If the low light AF were improved, I am sure it would have been mentioned.
"I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins...events, talks, speeches, training, etc"Still unsure for now but I suspect the A6300 will overheat when recording 4K for a certain amount of time. I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins.
It's still a remarkable feature though for a camera, but if you need a 4K video recorder for long periods of recording such as events, talks, speeches, training, etc, go for an actual camcorder such as the FS series, or well, maybe a Panasonic as a low budget solution. But if the A6300 does record till the memory card is full then that's really something I would consider, but I highly suspect that cause even the flagship A7rII can't do that.
This is a consumer grade camera aimed at consumers, not CNN videographers. I don't take 20 second clips of my son's sporting events and then splice them all together in post. I shoot like most consumers do, aim it at my kid and hit the record button - for however long they're playing/acting/dancing/performing etc. which is a lot longer than 15 seconds, usually several minutes at a time, over and over."I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins...events, talks, speeches, training, etc"Still unsure for now but I suspect the A6300 will overheat when recording 4K for a certain amount of time. I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins.
It's still a remarkable feature though for a camera, but if you need a 4K video recorder for long periods of recording such as events, talks, speeches, training, etc, go for an actual camcorder such as the FS series, or well, maybe a Panasonic as a low budget solution. But if the A6300 does record till the memory card is full then that's really something I would consider, but I highly suspect that cause even the flagship A7rII can't do that.
Let me get this straight - you press the video button and let a camera run for 30-40 minutes? The only videos I know that are shot that way are the security cameras at an all-night 7-11.
I think these cameras are intended to be shot for 20-30 second clips for serious editing. Video as a journalistic tool. Please watch a CNN show like Fareed Zakaria, or Squawk Box on CNN. They rarely keep a camera on a subject for more than 15 seconds.
I went looking for this spec too on the a6300 and found that it says -1EV to 20EV when using an F/2.0 lens. The a6000 says 0EV to 20EV when using an F/2.8 lens. So is the a6300 really any better if you have to use a lens that is a stop faster?Just a general reply to those who were asking - According to the Sony web site the low light focus is improved to -1 EV
Of course "it's gonna cost ya" but the right tool for the job, right? Speaking of which, the 24-70 FE may be a better buy than the 16-70, but it's not comparable in focal length covered on an APSC camera. Apples and oranges. If you wanted an orange and paid less for an apple, would it be a bargain? I would suggest not.You can have both.... but it's gonna cost ya ;-) (A7SII, A7RII)For me, it's more about the full sensor readout than 4k. If the camera does 1080p with full readout that's highly beneficial. If it bins 1080p, then just record 4k and downscale later. This will result in a major improvement in 1080p noise performance, even going up against an FF sensor that is disadvantaged by binning.The other question comes from the value of 4K just as a video resolution period. For photo editing and computer work- YES! For video on a screen you are going to be sitting >7' away from....?
I don't know if I am buying the crop thing either. You increase noise and aberrations that much more too. I think all of Sony's zooms have OSS- win win. No need to crop, just zoom and take advantage of your sensor.
Crisp 1080p is eye cuttingly sharp for video viewed normally.... I personally don't see the value of 4K video at the moment.
$1150 hurts too. Between this and the X-Pro 2 manufacturers are really doubling down on the early adopter tax.
Right now - A6300 superior for video, A7II superior for stills. Would've been nice not to have to choose.
I think Sony's body strategy is wise. Everyone wants a NEX-7 successor, but there's two problems with that. One a pro crop body is worthless without pro crop glass, and that's just not coming. 2.... you look at other pro crop bodies, and for casual shooters the value proposition is off. If I am a general user and not a sports/wildlife pro, what does a 7D2 or NX1 give me that an A7II or 6D don't? Even lens wise, FE outdoes E in some aspects. 24-70/4 is a better buy than the 16-70 IMO for example.
I think if video is a priority and you don't want to go FF you have to go with those Panasonics personally.
It depends on what you are using 4K video for. Many will not care about video, or may not want to deal with the larger file sizes, etc. But all other things being equal, you will get better image quality with far more information available for post production from 4K than from 1080. For video people, this is a significant leap in video capability over the A6000.The other question comes from the value of 4K just as a video resolution period. For photo editing and computer work- YES! For video on a screen you are going to be sitting >7' away from....?
I don't know if I am buying the crop thing either. You increase noise and aberrations that much more too. I think all of Sony's zooms have OSS- win win. No need to crop, just zoom and take advantage of your sensor.
Crisp 1080p is eye cuttingly sharp for video viewed normally.... I personally don't see the value of 4K video at the moment.
$1150 hurts too. Between this and the X-Pro 2 manufacturers are really doubling down on the early adopter tax.
Higher min. shutter speed.Let's get this thread started. I'll probably upgrade to the A6300 in due course, but it's not an immediate trigger pull for me.
I'm not entirely sure, but it appears to be missing some compelling feature sets:
What else?
- IBIS?
- 1080p 120fps?
- Touch screen?
Ergonomically
I like the fact they have added a AF/MF button, something that annoys me on the A6000
But :-
Still only the 1 dial plus rotating D-PAd - surely another dial would not go amiss
Still only 2 customization buttons - Need another 2
What has Sony got against touch screens anyway?
I shoot video of my son's soccer matches and although I stop and start in between they are definitely a lot longer than 15 seconds."I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins...events, talks, speeches, training, etc"Still unsure for now but I suspect the A6300 will overheat when recording 4K for a certain amount of time. I have heard reports that the A7rii overheats after around 30-40 mins.
It's still a remarkable feature though for a camera, but if you need a 4K video recorder for long periods of recording such as events, talks, speeches, training, etc, go for an actual camcorder such as the FS series, or well, maybe a Panasonic as a low budget solution. But if the A6300 does record till the memory card is full then that's really something I would consider, but I highly suspect that cause even the flagship A7rII can't do that.
Let me get this straight - you press the video button and let a camera run for 30-40 minutes? The only videos I know that are shot that way are the security cameras at an all-night 7-11.
I think these cameras are intended to be shot for 20-30 second clips for serious editing. Video as a journalistic tool. Please watch a CNN show like Fareed Zakaria, or Squawk Box on CNN. They rarely keep a camera on a subject for more than 15 seconds.