Reading mode: Light Dark

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II specs

Go to last post
expro said:
I have used both on safari and I would choose 1dx every time just for AF.

not sure why your friends have such good 7d2s but in my case it was very clear to me.

just saying this to give a balanced view and not revert to that old 'heh it's four times the price' stuff.
Click to expand...
There was an interview of Canon engineer by a Japanese publication soon after 7DII was released (can't find the link anymore). He was specifically asked about 1D X and 7DII AF. According to the engineer 1D X's AF was 'overall' better. He also commented about number of AF points. According to him, a higher number (beyond a certain number) won't be necessarily better (unless you have superfast processing power).

From my experience there wasn't any tangible difference between 7DII (I don't own anymore) and 5DIII in AF tracking.
 
Member said:
larry said:
I am shocked-SHOCKED that all the nikon trolls are so disappointed with this camera.

61 AF points at f8-fantastic.

16 frames per second with dual-pixel AF-fantastic.

Canon long primes-fantastic.

Canon continues to own 2/3rds of the pro market-same-old, same-old.
Click to expand...
4k at 60fps is pretty special too. no one's doing that.

now with DPAF and what they are calling "AI AF accuracy and motion tracking was improved Servo AF III" I wonder if that's that hybrid patent that uses both PDAF sensors and DPAF senors.

more specs are coming out:

20.2MP CMOS Sensor

Dynamic range improvement

Dual pixel CMOS AF

Dual DIGIC6 + processor

ISO100-51200 (extended with 409600)

Continuous shooting 14 frames / sec.

Live View mode at 16 frames / sec – high-speed continuous shooting new mirror drive system to allow the (at 16 frames / sec.)

Continuous shooting possible number is 170 frames in RAW -. In JPEG Unlimited

61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type

AF is -3EV correspondence

With lighting AF point red (I hope this means solid red AF point in servo)

AI AF accuracy and motion tracking was improved Servo AF III + – 360000 dot metering sensor.

EOS iSA. EOS itr

Viewfinder magnification 0.76 times. 100% field of view

Videos 4K 60fps.

Full HD120fps.

4K video can be recorded with the internal CFast2.0 Media

Movie Servo AF – LCD monitor 3.2 inches, 1.62 million dot. Touch panel.

Camera digital lens Optimizer (DLO).

Lens aberration correction.

Diffraction correction

CFast2.0 and compact flash of dual card slot

GPS built-in – 2-axis electronic level

USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal

W-FI option (WFT-E8A)

Size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6 mm

DLO in camera?? :o

that would be freaking incredible - all your lens corrections done before you even write out the RAW file? hmm.
Click to expand...
I am not a Nikon troll yet the second and last part of tech specs are definitely more interesting than the earlier ones.
--
All the best from northern Italy, Dino.
I'm on the NIK side of photography.
 
AF tracking on 1dx is significantly better than 5d3 - well for me! And I must have shot tens of thousands of comparisons over the last few years... 75000 keepers!

Also I must be weird as I definitely do not want more AF points than current 1dx.

I find extremely easy to use and very accurate.

that's my experience.
 
tvstaff said:
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
Click to expand...
kind of a weird comment - how can you tell anything outside of Mp's that don't meet your needs?
 
Last edited:
Member said:
tvstaff said:
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
Click to expand...
kind of a weird comment - how can you tell anything outside of Mp's that don't meet your needs?
Click to expand...
Please tell me what I need. I've been speaking for 2yrs and what I get is no more than a popcorn machine. If these are the specs.... I won't be buying the 3 bodies I planned to. What was Ford's son's name ? ;)
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
 
Alastair Norcross said:
Don Lacy said:
Alastair Norcross said:
Don Lacy said:
lightmatters said:
jffielde said:
Wow, that is a weak showing so far. The only thing we had rumored before was a barely detectable resolution increase, and now not even that. I'm surprised they'd even create a Mark II that's so little improved over the excellent 1Dx. Maybe they'll deliver on a serious improvement to the 11.8 stops of DR.
Click to expand...
Agree. I still don't understand why Canon is not using 7D Mark II AF system on 1D X Mark II. Is it supposed to be better?
Click to expand...
Your kidding right.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Don't understand all the complaints in this thread. The spec basically look like what I expected. Slightly better AF, a tad faster, a few more mps, slightly better dr and a welcome update of its video features (including AF)

The new Nikon is similar.

Still people feel, uhum, cheated in some kind of weird way.

Strange times.
 
Last edited:
Fog Maker said:
Don't understand all the complaints in this thread. The spec basically look like what I expected. Slightly better AF, a tad faster, a few more mps, slightly better dr and a welcome update of its video features (including AF)

The new Nikon is similar.

Still people feel, uhum, cheated in some kind of weird way.

Strange times.
Click to expand...
I guess some people are photographers. Go figure. They spent $7,000 on their 1DX and figure they should spend another $5,000 to upgrade their 1DX?

I'm so underwhelmed as a photographer. I only wish Cannon had put the resources and innovation into photography vs videographics.

Most people wont get this. They won't even get the concept. How amazing a sports photographer who expected the 1DX to devoted to photography vs video.

Two types of cards??? Does anyone at Canon know anything about workflow or shooting sports in the field. Are they insane, stupid, don't care or indifferent?

All this for video? As a pro if we shoot video we have video cameras that cost $100k up. Canon wants to merge enthusiast amature and pro equipment? WTH are they thinking.

I'm dissapointed and insulted if the specs in this thread are true. I was prepared to spend another 7 to 100 on an upgrade to the 1DX and it seems like we got mush.
 
I have also shot both quite a bit and while I like the 1Dx quite a bit I really didn’t find the difference between the performance of the two to be enough to make me lay down the cash for the 1Dx. For my style of shooting I just wasn’t seeing much benefit from the higher end body over the 7D2. I have no doubts that tons of people do see enough benefit for the cost but I really do find it a little shocking that people claim that there is a major difference between the AF of the two cameras. Sure there are differences but wow, I never saw that night and day difference that some seem to be suggesting exists. Of course this is the Internet. By the way I am a big Canon fan.

Greg
 
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"

Or switch to Nikon. You get lesser video features but better DR, high iso noise at higher cost.
tvstaff said:
tvstaff said:
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=

canon_eos1dx_markii_f001.jpg
Click to expand...
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...


--
Macro and Bird Photography
www.danielslim.com

Daniel Lim's Nature, Wildlife, Macro and Bird Photography

Bird, Wildlife, Macro, Extreme Macro, Landscape and Nature Photography by Daniel Swee Lim
www.danielslim.com www.danielslim.com
 
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"
Click to expand...
The price of the 1D4 when it came out was $4999. So are you saying that the price of the 1DX II will be closer to $4999 than the more frequently rumored $5999? Because that would be significant.
 
I don't do rumor... and Stay late Sunday night.
Thoughts R Us said:
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"
Click to expand...
The price of the 1D4 when it came out was $4999. So are you saying that the price of the 1DX II will be closer to $4999 than the more frequently rumored $5999? Because that would be significant.
Click to expand...
 
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"

Or switch to Nikon. You get lesser video features but better DR, high iso noise at higher cost.
tvstaff said:
Daniel L said:
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=

canon_eos1dx_markii_f001.jpg
Click to expand...
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...
--
Macro and Bird Photography
http://www.danielslim.com
Click to expand...
I guess the difference is. I expected to pay 7 to up to $10,000 to get the 1DX MKII I wanted and needed from Canon.

I wanted a PRO Camera devoted to sports photography. What they seem to have done it try and make a lot of people happy by not meeting the unusually high expectations of a segment of their market that is utilized by professional sports photographers.

We get paid for our work because we capture horribly lit, fast moving objects that are fraught with blacks and shadows in mixed lighting in the worst weather conditions at time.

My oil spewing mirror box on my 1DX works well when it's not at CPS being replaced.... You would think after everything we've been through that Canon would have put those that supported the PRO line the most would have had more consideration.

If these specs are true... Canon has really underperformed.

Perhaps in a few years they will see what they have done.... If I had another option that would utilize a sizable investment in Canon glass... they would get my business.

I still don't believe these are the spec. They just seem so pedestrian.



--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
 
tvstaff said:
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"

Or switch to Nikon. You get lesser video features but better DR, high iso noise at higher cost.
tvstaff said:
tvstaff said:
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=
Click to expand...
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...
--
Macro and Bird Photography
http://www.danielslim.com
Click to expand...
I guess the difference is. I expected to pay 7 to up to $10,000 to get the 1DX MKII I wanted and needed from Canon.

I wanted a PRO Camera devoted to sports photography. What they seem to have done it try and make a lot of people happy by not meeting the unusually high expectations of a segment of their market that is utilized by professional sports photographers.

We get paid for our work because we capture horribly lit, fast moving objects that are fraught with blacks and shadows in mixed lighting in the worst weather conditions at time.

My oil spewing mirror box on my 1DX works well when it's not at CPS being replaced.... You would think after everything we've been through that Canon would have put those that supported the PRO line the most would have had more consideration.

If these specs are true... Canon has really underperformed.

Perhaps in a few years they will see what they have done.... If I had another option that would utilize a sizable investment in Canon glass... they would get my business.

I still don't believe these are the spec. They just seem so pedestrian.

--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...
Pardon my ignorance, as I am not a pro...just someone who really loves photography as a hobby.

But isn't even the current 1DX a wonderful pro camera made for high speed action photography? Can it not do everything you describe? Everything I've ever read about it from people who've used it is glowingly positive. Whenever I look at a game on TV, most of what I see the sports journalists using are Canon 1DX's.

You make it seem like the 1DX can't do the job, but it sure seems like it does. I looked on your site and your pictures seem quite impressive, so the 1DX seems to do the job well for you too.

Now granted, if you had a problem with oil on the mirror box, that's a separate issue of QC...and others have noted that...although, again, most users have not had a problem, from what I have read.

So sure this camera could have been made with even more features for more money...but that's true of any product. Even a $1 million Ferrari could have been made to be a $1.5 million car with additional features.

But I would think that this camera would be a fine tool for the type of photography you do...now granted, for you it might not go far enough in its feature set..but it will still do an amazing job.
 
I feel you. On the other hands, thousands others like me won't be able to get the 1D because of huge price jump. I stop upgrading at 1D4 because the increase was too much. Now, the wait is well wort it, i can get cheaper 1DX with 120fps full HD. One feature i've been waiting for ages - smoother slow mode in post-processing.
tvstaff said:
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"

Or switch to Nikon. You get lesser video features but better DR, high iso noise at higher cost.
tvstaff said:
tvstaff said:
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=

canon_eos1dx_markii_f001.jpg
Click to expand...
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...
--
Macro and Bird Photography
http://www.danielslim.com
Click to expand...
I guess the difference is. I expected to pay 7 to up to $10,000 to get the 1DX MKII I wanted and needed from Canon.

I wanted a PRO Camera devoted to sports photography. What they seem to have done it try and make a lot of people happy by not meeting the unusually high expectations of a segment of their market that is utilized by professional sports photographers.

We get paid for our work because we capture horribly lit, fast moving objects that are fraught with blacks and shadows in mixed lighting in the worst weather conditions at time.

My oil spewing mirror box on my 1DX works well when it's not at CPS being replaced.... You would think after everything we've been through that Canon would have put those that supported the PRO line the most would have had more consideration.

If these specs are true... Canon has really underperformed.

Perhaps in a few years they will see what they have done.... If I had another option that would utilize a sizable investment in Canon glass... they would get my business.

I still don't believe these are the spec. They just seem so pedestrian.

--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...


--
Macro and Bird Photography
www.danielslim.com

Daniel Lim's Nature, Wildlife, Macro and Bird Photography

Bird, Wildlife, Macro, Extreme Macro, Landscape and Nature Photography by Daniel Swee Lim
www.danielslim.com www.danielslim.com
 
Thoughts R Us said:
tvstaff said:
Daniel L said:
People read into rumor site, believe in the made up nonsense and crazy spec they thought every manufacturer should provide. Now, that's stupid.

DSLR is in HUGE decline, they are losing ground to young smartphone audiences by large margin. I don't expect any breathtaking technology invest in high end models. This is as good as it gets, but the "price" would be much attractive than previous model, much better D5.

May be they think its more feasible to cut the features with competitive price to stay afloat. Many of us wouldn't be able to pay $7-8k for the best 1D has to offer. But i don't mind paying close to "1D4" retail price for 1DX II. "hint hint"

Or switch to Nikon. You get lesser video features but better DR, high iso noise at higher cost.
tvstaff said:
Thoughts R Us said:
Source in Japanese and the text is the output of Google translator.

The specs are not impressive comparing to Nikon D5 :-|

From the direction of the reader, we have to provide information about the sharp images and specs of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II.
  • Canon announce soon EOS-1D X Mark II. As of specs of next EOS-1D X Mark II that is currently known.
    - 20.2MP CMOS sensor. Dynamic range improvement
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF
    - 61-point AF system, which range is expanded. 41-point cross-type. All of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - With lighting AF point red
    - F8 even 61 points all of the distance measuring point can be selected
    - AI AF accuracy and motion tracking has improved Servo AF III +
    - Dual DIGIC6 + processor
    - New mirror drive system that enables high-speed continuous shooting
    - Video 4K 60fps. Possible internal recording at CFast2.0T media
    - Continuous shooting up to 16 frames / sec (live view mode)
    - Dual pixel CMOS AF, enables smooth AF with 4K video
    - GPS built-in
    - USB3.0 terminal, HDMI terminal
    - Dust and water specification
    - Wi-Fi option (WFT-E8)
    - The size of 158mm x 167.6mm x 82.6mm
    - Weight 1340g
EOS-1D X Mark II is, I seem to be equipped with a 4K video of rumor as 60fps. AF is, does not change what the distance measurement points, the range is expanded, It is quite fascinating to all of the distance measuring point is enabled in the F8.

In appearance stand out climax of penta upper portion, but whether this would be GPS. After that, it is where the frame speed and ISO range of continuous shooting in the normal mode is a concern.

Source: _https://translate.google.com/transl...-8&u=http://www.digicame-info.com/&edit-text=
Click to expand...
All this stupid. all I'm seeing are reasons not to buy the next 1DX MKII. These specs must have been posted by Nikon. Canon is not this stupid. No company would purposely look to lose their pro photo customers.
--
Feel Always Humble - "FAH" - You'll Learn More
http://www.kissmykite.com
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
It's like this every release...
 
tvstaff said:
tvstaff said:
Don't understand all the complaints in this thread. The spec basically look like what I expected. Slightly better AF, a tad faster, a few more mps, slightly better dr and a welcome update of its video features (including AF)

The new Nikon is similar.

Still people feel, uhum, cheated in some kind of weird way.

Strange times.
Click to expand...
I guess some people are photographers. Go figure. They spent $7,000 on their 1DX and figure they should spend another $5,000 to upgrade their 1DX?

I'm so underwhelmed as a photographer. I only wish Cannon had put the resources and innovation into photography vs videographics.

Most people wont get this. They won't even get the concept. How amazing a sports photographer who expected the 1DX to devoted to photography vs video.

Two types of cards??? Does anyone at Canon know anything about workflow or shooting sports in the field. Are they insane, stupid, don't care or indifferent?

All this for video? As a pro if we shoot video we have video cameras that cost $100k up. Canon wants to merge enthusiast amature and pro equipment? WTH are they thinking.

I'm dissapointed and insulted if the specs in this thread are true. I was prepared to spend another 7 to 100 on an upgrade to the 1DX and it seems like we got mush.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Maoby
Kodak DCS 460 (1995) / Canon EOS-1D Mark II N (2005)
Replies
1
Views
592
Maoby
Maoby
MJ_Photo38
Olympus E-M1 mark II : I'm shocked
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
9K
SeeingSomeThingsMissingMany
SeeingSomeThingsMissingMany
Maoby
Canon EOS-1D Mark lV, the latest APS-H
Replies
19
Views
350
Maoby
Maoby
S
Official Canon EOS R1 Images and Specifications
Replies
3
Views
2K
BirdShooter7
B
jschoonj
S1R II: official images and full press text
5 6 7
Replies
125
Views
17K
John Vickers
John Vickers

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top