Why was my challenge entry disqualified ("Fortune teller")?

justpictures1

Member
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi

I got a letter from dpreview saying that my pciture for the challenge "Fortune Teller" had finished 18th. Yet, to my surprise, when looking at the challenge results, I saw that my entry had been "disqualified" after the end of the voting process. I suspect the reason was that the picture showed a fortune teller's business, not the person. However, the Merriam-Webster online-dictionary says:

Butcher:

1 a
: someone who cuts and sells meat in a shop

b : someone who kills animals and prepares their meat to be eaten

2 : a shop that sells meat
  • The town was small but had a grocery store and a butcher (store/shop).
(Bold type mine). Now a) an American dictionary of that calibre should be considered authoritative enough and b) what applies to "butcher" should also apply to "fortune teller", shouldn't it. Otherwise, what should a non-native-speaker of English be able to rely on?

Thank you, DPR-challenge-Team, for an explanation for the disqualification.

For all other people: you can have a look at my entry in my gallery:


justpictures1
 
There is no DPR-Challenge-team.

It is the Challenge host to whom you must address your grievances. Send him/her a private message.

Your analogy does not work. Try looking at the definition of Fortune Teller in an English dictionary.
--
Charlie
 
Forgive me for answering for him, but "Submit an image of a Fortune Teller" means he wanted a photo of the person who tells fortunes. Not the place they do it in.

I hope this helps.
Hi

I got a letter from dpreview saying that my pciture for the challenge "Fortune Teller" had finished 18th. Yet, to my surprise, when looking at the challenge results, I saw that my entry had been "disqualified" after the end of the voting process. I suspect the reason was that the picture showed a fortune teller's business, not the person. However, the Merriam-Webster online-dictionary says:

Butcher:

1 a
: someone who cuts and sells meat in a shop

b : someone who kills animals and prepares their meat to be eaten

2 : a shop that sells meat
  • The town was small but had a grocery store and a butcher (store/shop).
(Bold type mine). Now a) an American dictionary of that calibre should be considered authoritative enough and b) what applies to "butcher" should also apply to "fortune teller", shouldn't it. Otherwise, what should a non-native-speaker of English be able to rely on?

Thank you, DPR-challenge-Team, for an explanation for the disqualification.

For all other people: you can have a look at my entry in my gallery:

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/302610406

justpictures1
 
Forgive me for answering for him, but "Submit an image of a Fortune Teller" means he wanted a photo of the person who tells fortunes. Not the place they do it in.
Then why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? There's not a "person" in those pictures.

Larry G.
 
Forgive me for answering for him, but "Submit an image of a Fortune Teller" means he wanted a photo of the person who tells fortunes. Not the place they do it in.
Then why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? There's not a "person" in those pictures.

Larry G.
I wasn't the host, so I wasn't the one applying rules. Sorry, I don't know.
 
Forgive me for answering for him, but "Submit an image of a Fortune Teller" means he wanted a photo of the person who tells fortunes. Not the place they do it in.
Then why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? There's not a "person" in those pictures.

Larry G.
Perhaps because the rules did not specify a LIVE fortune teller?
 
Thank you for all your clarifications, whether they support my view or not.

I think it was a somewhat unfortunate decision of the host of the challgenge not to check the submissions regularly and to wait instead with the disqualification until after the end of the challenge with the participants having been infored as to their rankings. But he seems to have decided not to respond to our questions.

justpictures1
 
Forgive me for answering for him, but "Submit an image of a Fortune Teller" means he wanted a photo of the person who tells fortunes. Not the place they do it in.
Then why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? There's not a "person" in those pictures.

Larry G.
Perhaps because the rules did not specify a LIVE fortune teller?
Agree. There are machines which feature a mechanized person who is still telling a fortune. It's just not the same as a picture of a building. Buildings do not tell fortunes.
 
Thank you for all your clarifications, whether they support my view or not.

I think it was a somewhat unfortunate decision of the host of the challgenge not to check the submissions regularly and to wait instead with the disqualification until after the end of the challenge with the participants having been infored as to their rankings. But he seems to have decided not to respond to our questions.

justpictures1
I don't think there was much point responding. A reasonable interpretation of the rules brings the same end result, a person (or mechanical person) telling fortunes is not the same as a photo of a building.

How about a challenge stating 'Submit a photo of a plumber'. Would a picture of a shop with a sign on it be a plumber?
 
I was traveling for a couple of weeks and had very limited access to the Internet. And when I did, a hand surgery didn't motivate me to respond timely. Thanks.
 
It would be in your best interest to email the challenge host directly and ask for specifics on why your entry was disqualified. With that aside, always be careful you are closely following challenge rules. The photo may not have fit the subject of the challenge. I do believe challenge hosts should say on top of disqualifying challenge entries that don't fit their criteria during the submission phase.

--Sarah
 
Thank you for all your clarifications, whether they support my view or not.

I think it was a somewhat unfortunate decision of the host of the challgenge not to check the submissions regularly and to wait instead with the disqualification until after the end of the challenge with the participants having been infored as to their rankings. But he seems to have decided not to respond to our questions.

justpictures1
I don't think there was much point responding. A reasonable interpretation of the rules brings the same end result, a person (or mechanical person) telling fortunes is not the same as a photo of a building.

How about a challenge stating 'Submit a photo of a plumber'. Would a picture of a shop with a sign on it be a plumber?
Not necessarily. First off, only a farfetched interpretation of a machine can make it into a person. While it would take a person to occupy the building to complete the telling of one’s fortune, it likewise takes a person to program and maintain the machine to offer the same service. I would say that the person element is clearly missing in both situations.

Larry G.
 
The challenge was to "submit an image of a Fortune Teller".

That is it, nothing else. It does not say human, alive or otherwise.

It is your interpretation that the Fortune Teller had to be a person.
 
The challenge was to "submit an image of a Fortune Teller".

That is it, nothing else. It does not say human, alive or otherwise.

It is your interpretation that the Fortune Teller had to be a person.
Initially I was responding to an earlier post from Bikinchris who suggested “Submit an image of a Fortune Teller” means he wanted a photo of the person who tells the fortunes. I then asked why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? They did not contain a "person" in those pictures.

In regards to the fortune telling machines, I can make an argument that the person who maintains them and provides the fortunes is the actual fortune teller. Here are a couple of rhetorical questions. Can you say that a crystal ball or a set of tarot cards by themselves are fortune tellers? I’d say they are objects used by fortune tellers no different than a fortune telling machine. Or how about if you baked a batch of fortune cookies. Who's the fortune teller, you who wrote and inserted the fortunes into the cookies or the cookies themselves? To me the cookies have absolutely no ability the tell one's fortune - they are just cookies.

There are robotic surgical systems that are capable of performing complex surgical procedures. I doubt that there are any patients who refer to them as their surgeon.

Thanks for the discussion,

Larry G.
 
The challenge was to "submit an image of a Fortune Teller".

That is it, nothing else. It does not say human, alive or otherwise.

It is your interpretation that the Fortune Teller had to be a person.
Initially I was responding to an earlier post from Bikinchris who suggested “Submit an image of a Fortune Teller” means he wanted a photo of the person who tells the fortunes. I then asked why wasn't 7, 10, 11 & 15 disqualified? They did not contain a "person" in those pictures.

In regards to the fortune telling machines, I can make an argument that the person who maintains them and provides the fortunes is the actual fortune teller. Here are a couple of rhetorical questions. Can you say that a crystal ball or a set of tarot cards by themselves are fortune tellers? I’d say they are objects used by fortune tellers no different than a fortune telling machine. Or how about if you baked a batch of fortune cookies. Who's the fortune teller, you who wrote and inserted the fortunes into the cookies or the cookies themselves? To me the cookies have absolutely no ability the tell one's fortune - they are just cookies.

There are robotic surgical systems that are capable of performing complex surgical procedures. I doubt that there are any patients who refer to them as their surgeon.

Thanks for the discussion,

Larry G.
And this kind of discussion makes hosting challenges far less fun. Either you write tons of rules no one wants to read to discourage people trying to find loopholes, or your the "bad guy" who disqualifies people who act like they don't understand.

I especially like the people who keep entering a photo that doesn't fit the challenge even after you have disqualified it several times.
 
And this kind of discussion makes hosting challenges far less fun. Either you write tons of rules no one wants to read to discourage people trying to find loopholes, or your the "bad guy" who disqualifies people who act like they don't understand.
Exactly the thought I had earlier today.
 
The challenge was to "submit an image of a Fortune Teller".

That is it, nothing else. It does not say human, alive or otherwise.

It is your interpretation that the Fortune Teller had to be a person.
I agree with you. The mechanized fortune teller still provides a fortune to the customer. And some of those mechanical fortune tellers make for a very good photo op as they really play up the traditional seers' dress and jewelry. A building is not a fortune teller.

pup.jpg


gypsy-voice-fortune-teller.jpg


fortune-teller-4-600x398.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hi

I got a letter from dpreview saying that my pciture for the challenge "Fortune Teller" had finished 18th. Yet, to my surprise, when looking at the challenge results, I saw that my entry had been "disqualified" after the end of the voting process. I suspect the reason was that the picture showed a fortune teller's business, not the person. However, the Merriam-Webster online-dictionary says:

Butcher:

1 a
: someone who cuts and sells meat in a shop

b : someone who kills animals and prepares their meat to be eaten

2 : a shop that sells meat
  • The town was small but had a grocery store and a butcher (store/shop).
(Bold type mine). Now a) an American dictionary of that calibre should be considered authoritative enough and b) what applies to "butcher" should also apply to "fortune teller", shouldn't it. Otherwise, what should a non-native-speaker of English be able to rely on?
Perhaps they should have left your entry in. It would likely and justifiably finished at or near the very bottom though, being the loosest possible interpretation of a 'fortune teller'.

In some countries, an automobile is referred to as a 'motor' but I doubt people are actually sitting on the back of a running engine atop some wheels when they drive down the road.
Thank you, DPR-challenge-Team, for an explanation for the disqualification.

For all other people: you can have a look at my entry in my gallery:

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/302610406

justpictures1
 
The challenge was to "submit an image of a Fortune Teller".

That is it, nothing else. It does not say human, alive or otherwise.

It is your interpretation that the Fortune Teller had to be a person.
I agree with you. The mechanized fortune teller still provides a fortune to the customer. And some of those mechanical fortune tellers make for a very good photo op as they really play up the traditional seers' dress and jewelry. A building is not a fortune teller.

pup.jpg


gypsy-voice-fortune-teller.jpg


fortune-teller-4-600x398.jpg
I can't help wondering if a picture of a Chinese fortune cookie would be disqualified? 😊

I'd be OK with the ruling either way, but like the mechanical fortune tellers, it also tells a fortune.

Anyway, let me say that I enjoyed the challenge, especially the winning picture, and also enjoyed the picture that we are discussing that was disqualified, although I agree with the disqualification.
--
- Bill
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top