Reading mode: Light Dark

My first Studio with V1

Go to last post
G

Gabriel Canas

Member
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Location
Guadalajara, MX
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
 
How about that. I believe this is the first time we've heard of the V1 being used for professional work int he studio. Are these going to be used for clothing catalogs?

Your English is fine.

You may want to give some thought to either more light or brighter exposure, but you're doing fine.
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
 
You have some nice pics there. But save yourself so much post work and get a decent backdrop and use some light on it so you don't get shadows. Nothing wrong with fixing it later I suppose but why not just do it right the first time.
 
Generally very nice. I did notice the seam in the background running down the middle of the frame. You said you have been editing those. You may want to consider a roll of white seamless paper:
http://www03.bhphotovideo.com/sitem/sku=45468&is=REG

It comes in 9 foot rolls and looks very good in pictures. Especially if you can light the background separately from the models. I noticed you were using at least two lights. A third light would let you light the background, or alternatively, using the second light to light the background and a foamcore reflector as the fill for the models. Worth a try anyway. A lit background will look much better than an unlit background unless that is the style you are going for.

Be careful with those low angle shots, the top of the background and beyond shows up in some of the images. Always tough to keep looking for the end of the background showing in the frame, but it saves editing it out later which can save time if you are on a deadline.

And it looks like something behind the background is showing through the fabric slightly. You may need to cover whatever that is with extra white fabric so it does not show through.

But you are on your way, this kind of practical experience will make your next shoot that much higher in quality and satisfaction. Keep at it, it is looking good. The details and exposure and focus look great.

--
Shay

My Sony F707 & F717 Gallery: http://www.shaystephens.com/portfolio.asp
My F717 Observations: http://www.shaystephens.com/f717.asp
 
hmmm... generally ok... models look great for sure... posing
is adequate...background seam is showing through?...floor
fabric rippling effect is ok but the hard shadows or not...
ok if this is your first or second try at it... well you asked for
criticism and you got it... everything I've said is what I
honestly feel about the pix... good luck to you.

models are very nice, did I say that? =))
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
 
Yes was for clothing catalogs, was so good my print ( heidelberg Speedmaster 74 DI ) , I never thought I can use a small camera to do that , always I used 35 mm or 6x9 film . My client was surprise too.
I shoot in to three steps option ( - normal + ) to control more or less light .
I will post the final shoot later on.

Thanks for your opinion
Ulysses said:
Your English is fine.

You may want to give some thought to either more light or brighter
exposure, but you're doing fine.
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
Click to expand...
 
thank you for your advice
Shay Stephens said:
Generally very nice. I did notice the seam in the background
running down the middle of the frame. You said you have been
editing those. You may want to consider a roll of white seamless
paper:
http://www03.bhphotovideo.com/sitem/sku=45468&is=REG
It comes in 9 foot rolls and looks very good in pictures.
Especially if you can light the background separately from the
models. I noticed you were using at least two lights. A third
light would let you light the background, or alternatively, using
the second light to light the background and a foamcore reflector
as the fill for the models. Worth a try anyway. A lit background
will look much better than an unlit background unless that is the
style you are going for.

Be careful with those low angle shots, the top of the background
and beyond shows up in some of the images. Always tough to keep
looking for the end of the background showing in the frame, but it
saves editing it out later which can save time if you are on a
deadline.

And it looks like something behind the background is showing
through the fabric slightly. You may need to cover whatever that
is with extra white fabric so it does not show through.

But you are on your way, this kind of practical experience will
make your next shoot that much higher in quality and satisfaction.
Keep at it, it is looking good. The details and exposure and focus
look great.

--
Shay

My Sony F707 & F717 Gallery: http://www.shaystephens.com/portfolio.asp
My F717 Observations: http://www.shaystephens.com/f717.asp
Click to expand...
 
My final job done V1 fotos with photoshop 7:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria-final

16 pictures letter side , 72 dpis, jpg max quality.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
 
V1 seems to be a strange choice for a studio camera. E20 or 717 would be much better. I think it's better to invest in something like 10D for a studio work, but it's only my opinion.

Look at the skin tone on this one: dsc00196.JPG - its amlost yellow.
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
 
Very nice. The finished product looks great!
Gabriel Canas said:
http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria-final

16 pictures letter side , 72 dpis, jpg max quality.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Shay

My Sony F707 & F717 Gallery: http://www.shaystephens.com/portfolio.asp
My F717 Observations: http://www.shaystephens.com/f717.asp
 
Well done Gabriel and congratulations!

Richard_
 
Gabriel Canas said:
http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria-final

16 pictures letter side , 72 dpis, jpg max quality.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Cliff. Johnston

Gabriel,

A good job well done.

That's the nice thing about this Sony forum - we have some really helpful contributors. I've seen some of the trolls elsewhere - UGH!

Keep up the good work. Hope to see more.

Cliff.
 
The point is that he did a studio job. And he didn't need to spend high-end bucks to get high-end results. Matter of fact, the only significant suggestions given to him so far involve lighting, not the camera.

The skin tone of the shots is not quite as important to him as he processes the pictures in post. With the F717, this is a challenge anyway, since you don't have RAW and you can't create a custom white balance for flash.

HOWEVER, your point is well taken, and it is quite applicable for Gabriel with the V1. Why so? Because the V1 can do a custom white balance WITH THE FLASH. I believe it can also do so with studio strobes (though I need to test for that). Therefore, I would strongly suggest to Gabriel that for his next shoot, he try to compensate here by using the V1's custom white balance. It could save a few extra steps in postprocessing.
Oleg K said:
V1 seems to be a strange choice for a studio camera. E20 or 717
would be much better. I think it's better to invest in something
like 10D for a studio work, but it's only my opinion.

Look at the skin tone on this one: dsc00196.JPG - its amlost yellow.
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
 
The final products look great. Love to see pro-consumer cam like Sony doing commercial work.
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
--
Lance
 
Another option is to shoot one frame with a gray card or other test target so you can make a custom color correction in post processing that can be applied to all the images in the same series.
Ulysses said:
The skin tone of the shots is not quite as important to him as he
processes the pictures in post. With the F717, this is a challenge
anyway, since you don't have RAW and you can't create a custom
white balance for flash.

HOWEVER, your point is well taken, and it is quite applicable for
Gabriel with the V1. Why so? Because the V1 can do a custom white
balance WITH THE FLASH. I believe it can also do so with studio
strobes (though I need to test for that). Therefore, I would
strongly suggest to Gabriel that for his next shoot, he try to
compensate here by using the V1's custom white balance. It could
save a few extra steps in postprocessing.
Oleg K said:
V1 seems to be a strange choice for a studio camera. E20 or 717
would be much better. I think it's better to invest in something
like 10D for a studio work, but it's only my opinion.

Look at the skin tone on this one: dsc00196.JPG - its amlost yellow.
Click to expand...
--

Ulysses
Click to expand...
--
Shay

My Sony F707 & F717 Gallery: http://www.shaystephens.com/portfolio.asp
My F717 Observations: http://www.shaystephens.com/f717.asp
 
I bought this V1 camera for home and for my jobs , why spent too much when I can get all in one camera ?

Thats right , Nikon or Canon professional digital cameras are the best , but when you can pay. In think in future I will get one of those , in might time I will use V1 , great camera.

Other way , I didn't have too much experience with light , thanks to Shay Stephens advice ( http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=569630 ) I going to improve my studio photos.

Oslo I shoot in indoor light , not very good idea , but with manual white balance ( pringled ) I will resolve this problem in future ( this I learn in this forum ( http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=5615027 ) thanks a lot .

Look the final shoot for : dsc00196.JPG http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria-final/source/calgary_copy.htm

V1 or 717 ? well , in mexico cost a lot more 717 than V1 , for quality I think is the same , more or less . I need to sacrifice some good things ( professional cameras ) to get my job working.

V1 is not like professional camera , but you can use it like it.

Thank you any way for your opinion Oleg , always is good listening .
Oleg K said:
Look at the skin tone on this one: dsc00196.JPG - its amlost yellow.
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Superb!

As it appears in someone's signature here "It's not as much about the camera as it is the photographer"... You've proven that!

Well done! Stever
Gabriel Canas said:
http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria-final

16 pictures letter side , 72 dpis, jpg max quality.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gabriel Canas said:
My first Studio with V1:

http://www.dolphinpro.net/lenceria

indoor white Balance
Spot indoor light
full resolution ( 5 Mpx )
( for web was compress to jpg medium quality and less resolution )

Photos with out retouching ( in the web ) , I made some changes
later on in photoshop ( background change , etc.. ).

Any opinion ?

Always is nice heart others opinions :-)

( sorry about my poor english )
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
...they don't qualify as 'galleries' but http://www.fotki.com/pukrat
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top