Interesting, thanks for the comparison. I thought the noise difference between the two would be more pronounced.raw ISO6400 : imported into PS without NR but with auto white balance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting, thanks for the comparison. I thought the noise difference between the two would be more pronounced.raw ISO6400 : imported into PS without NR but with auto white balance
Rocking the FE28 now: find it as nice as the 24z and for half the price, the improvements in IQ on the 24z just aren't worth it for me (I would be the only one seeing these improvements anyway). Looks like I will be keeping my A6000 and not go the hassle of selling it for a cam that's 3 x as expensive and renders marginal IQ improvements (none of my friend and family would see / care about the difference, I bet).I will get the primes anyway, I will put up the a7ii and a6000 up for sale because I know I will eventually get the a7r2. But for now I am too unsure to sell the d750 just yet, really need to use them side by side. Of course, only having the 28-70 for the a7ii isn't exactly a fair comparison to the great 24-120/4 let alone the zeiss 24z on the a 6000.
When I used the a7II with the 55mm/1.8 to take photos at a restaurant yesterday evening, I am sure I missed several pretty good shots due to the worse autofocus.Having been able to put the A7II through its paces and comparing it to my D750 and A6000, I've come to a rather refreshing conclusion. The A7II is great but it's not as good as my D750 for faster stuff (no surprises there). I just don't feel comfortable selling the D750 right now.
BUT... I also notice that since I have the A7II, I have pretty little interest in using my A6000, even though I have very good glass for the A6000. If I keep the D750, I have a camera that's very fast focussing, has great tracking and all the lenses one can imagine. If I would get the A7R2 I might limit myself. And I still have the RX100M3 for ultimate portability.
So I think I'm going to sell my whole A6000 setup, all lenses I have for it (1670Z, 24Z, SEL50, 1650) and also sell the A7II and use that money to get the A7R2 with one or two nice primes.
That way I'll have a very good SLR with good glass and amazing tracking, *and* the A7R2 which intrigues me to no end and should shine with primes. And I have the RX100M3 if I ever need something small.
I'm thinking the whole A6K setup should get me to around € 1.900 and the A7II will easily sell for € 1.200. Which is almost enough to fund the A7R2.
When I used the a7II with the 55mm/1.8 to take photos at a restaurant yesterday evening, I am sure I missed several pretty good shots due to the worse autofocus.Having been able to put the A7II through its paces and comparing it to my D750 and A6000, I've come to a rather refreshing conclusion. The A7II is great but it's not as good as my D750 for faster stuff (no surprises there). I just don't feel comfortable selling the D750 right now.
BUT... I also notice that since I have the A7II, I have pretty little interest in using my A6000, even though I have very good glass for the A6000. If I keep the D750, I have a camera that's very fast focussing, has great tracking and all the lenses one can imagine. If I would get the A7R2 I might limit myself. And I still have the RX100M3 for ultimate portability.
So I think I'm going to sell my whole A6000 setup, all lenses I have for it (1670Z, 24Z, SEL50, 1650) and also sell the A7II and use that money to get the A7R2 with one or two nice primes.
That way I'll have a very good SLR with good glass and amazing tracking, *and* the A7R2 which intrigues me to no end and should shine with primes. And I have the RX100M3 if I ever need something small.
I'm thinking the whole A6K setup should get me to around € 1.900 and the A7II will easily sell for € 1.200. Which is almost enough to fund the A7R2.
http://www.lightfinity.net/at-a-sushi-restaurant/
But I did manage to get a few good ones. It is just more of a struggle. The size/form factor is less intimidating and makes me feel more confident using it in public than a large DSLR type, but that is a personal issue.
In my opinion the a7RII has a lot better low light focusing, particularly in the strongly backlit situations that I was in, and it has a lot more refined polish than the a7II, which is a good camera in good light, but starts to fall apart in low light.
Having never used the D750, I'm sure it's a great camera, but if you like the EVF / Live View experience, small form factor and IBIS, you should love the a7RII. What you could do is wait a few months, slowly sell off your gear, and then at the next sale of the a7RII, see how you like it.
Sharp 1670Z lens! I bought my A6000 body only. I don't own any E-mount APS-C lenses after reading negative comments in the other E-mount forum. How does your 16-70Z do in the corners?
Interesting. DPReview seemed to give an impression that the difference would be more pronounced. It is good to see a different view point.Interesting, thanks for the comparison. I thought the noise difference between the two would be more pronounced.
--
http://www.lightfinity.net
That was exactly my experience. Currently have the A6000 + 16-70. I bought a A7ii + 28-70. Did some tests and returned the A7ii. Waiting for something significantly better.I do not mind spending a bit for a nice camera. From what I have experience thus far, the a6000 pleases me more than the a7ii (mind I have a ff dslr too).