8gb enough on Mbp 13" retina

RJayP

Member
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Location
Knoxville, Tn, US
I am looking to get a 13" MacBook pro retina, I am trying to decide if 8gb of Ram is enough or should I spend the extra $200 to upgrade to 16gb? I will primarily running Lightroom CC and Photoshop CC on it while on the go. I have a 27" iMac as my main station
 
There have been several posts recently about the amount of RAM needed for computers. I think it all depends on how long you plan to keep the laptop and what you plan to do with it when you are finished. 8GB should be sufficient to run PS & LR today, but what happens in two or five years with 30 and 50 megapixel cameras on the horizon and the inevitable software changes to keep up with larger and larger files? Odds are that 8GB won't be enough, but if you plan to sell the laptop then, you should be okay. My personal example is that my iMac was really powerful seven years ago when it came with 2GB and could be upgraded to a whopping 4GB of RAM. It could handle anything that Photoshop and Lightroom could throw at it with the 10-16 megapixel files. But nowadays, even though my cameras have not changed that much, my iMac runs like a dog with Lightroom 5 or 6 and Photoshop CC, even after I upgraded it to 6GB of RAM. The software evolution to keep up with camera evolution made my computer run more and more slowly to the point where I had to buy a new one... this time upgradable to 32GB of RAM. (Hopefully it will last for seven years before becoming outmoded!)
 
There have been several posts recently about the amount of RAM needed for computers. I think it all depends on how long you plan to keep the laptop and what you plan to do with it when you are finished. 8GB should be sufficient to run PS & LR today, but what happens in two or five years with 30 and 50 megapixel cameras on the horizon and the inevitable software changes to keep up with larger and larger files? Odds are that 8GB won't be enough, but if you plan to sell the laptop then, you should be okay. My personal example is that my iMac was really powerful seven years ago when it came with 2GB and could be upgraded to a whopping 4GB of RAM. It could handle anything that Photoshop and Lightroom could throw at it with the 10-16 megapixel files. But nowadays, even though my cameras have not changed that much, my iMac runs like a dog with Lightroom 5 or 6 and Photoshop CC, even after I upgraded it to 6GB of RAM. The software evolution to keep up with camera evolution made my computer run more and more slowly to the point where I had to buy a new one... this time upgradable to 32GB of RAM. (Hopefully it will last for seven years before becoming outmoded!)
I bought my MBPr in Dec and opted for the 16gig. was able to work a deal.

added 8gigs more and Apple care for for $200 more then the model with 8gigs with no apple care

call 800 myapple they may work with you

--
"The fact is that relatively few photographers ever master their medium. Instead they allow the medium to master them and go on an endless squirrel cage chase from new lens to new paper to new developer to new gadget, never staying with one piece of equipment long enough to learn its full capacities, becoming lost in a maze of technical information that is of little or no use since they don't know what to do with it."
A Great Quote by Edward Weston...
 
Last edited:
I have the 2015 13" rMBP with 8 gig and 512 gig SSD. It runs LR like a champ ! Faster than my quad core ASUS with SATA SSD. You will have no issues with 8 gig for LR.
 
Get 16 gig. Period. Memory is a huge bottleneck and it will just get worse in coming years. The different in resale value between 8 and 16 will increase as 8 becomes increasingly marginal.
 
I have 8gb on my matchbook air but I would always recommend getting as much ram as you can afford. It winds up paying dividends in the end
 
I bought 8GB 13" MBP/r with 512GB SSD. It runs well most times with LR5 even with A7r RAW files. It should be sufficient if you mainly process individual photos. But if you want to leverage pano feature in LR6, then more memory is highly suggested as it eats memory very fast. Without sufficient memory the pano process can run deadly slow (it's slow anyway). However sometime it's a hard choice as base models (with 8GB) frequently have discount in B&H for example (where I bought all Macs) but not on beef-up models. The same as base iMac 5K that I bought with $200 discount from B&H in last Dec. But if you want VESA edition, then there will be no discount. So it's a tough choice that Apple doesn't give you flexible ideal option that you must make a decision when you placing the orders as you cannot upgrade later in either case.
 
Last edited:
I am looking to get a 13" MacBook pro retina, I am trying to decide if 8gb of Ram is enough or should I spend the extra $200 to upgrade to 16gb? I will primarily running Lightroom CC and Photoshop CC on it while on the go. I have a 27" iMac as my main station
Some have suggested that the extra $200 is worth it, not because you need it for actual use, but because it increases the value sale of the MacBook Pro at a later date. Fair enough. But, actually, for use, 8GB RAM is enough. In my experience using a MacBook Pro 2011. Never reached near the limit of RAM use. No video editing though. But another way to look at it is, if you had to choose between a

225GB SSD drive - 16GB RAM

and

512GB SSD drive - 8 GB RAM

Take the larger SSD drive and smaller RAM - IMO
 
....But another way to look at it is, if you had to choose between a
225GB SSD drive - 16GB RAM

and

512GB SSD drive - 8 GB RAM

Take the larger SSD drive and smaller RAM - IMO
Hard drives are upgradable or you can use external, or SDXC card.

RAM is not upgradable.

I would find 8 gig acceptable if I tended to run one or two applications at a time. but I leave many more applications open and tend to have quite a few browser windows open too.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top