With or without?

RealPancho

Senior Member
Messages
1,315
Reaction score
644
Location
San Antonio, TX, US
Which is better, the one with or the one without the little girl?

24c7b4e306f041d08303fce457de54a4.jpg



b145ea8f260e45b780545fcc122010a8.jpg



--
Frank
 
With. The one with the girl creates a tension between the two figures that is lacking in the one with a single figure.
 
But both have no point
 
Lone guy contemplating on what to do with the object across from him. Mystery begins...
 
The little girl adds NOTHING to the picture.

Hal
 
I prefer the image with her. Her presence does add something for me, even if I'm hard-pressed to attribute i to anyhting other than better balance.
 
With, for sure.
 
I would say with the girl but without the hand cart - that seems really distracting to me
 
What sort of story do you wish to convey to your audience?
 
Without. Her motion wrecks a somber emotion photo.
 
What sort of story do you wish to convey to your audience?
You see Bob, that's kind of the problem. I'm not too sure. I'm really just interested in whichever one is more interesting. In one, you have a lone man under a bridge, seen in a (possibly) contemplative moment, while in the other, you have a lone man under a bridge......looking at a lone and possibly unsupervised little girl. To some people, the latter could have sinister implications.

So, without regard for what I want, which looks more interesting to you?
 
I would say with the girl but without the hand cart - that seems really distracting to me
I agree about the cart, but there ain't much i can do about that now. :\
 
Agreed. Without.

With disturbs the balance of adult, cart and (?) bicycle in the background.

IMHO, the addition of the little girl turns an interesting, open ended and well balanced photo into an unbalanced, pedestrian, domestic shot.

--
Regards, john from Melbourne, Australia.
.
Please do not embed images from my web site without prior permission
I consider this to be a breach of my copyright.
-- -- --
.
The Camera doth not make the Man (nor Woman) ...
Perhaps being kind to cats, dogs & children does ...
.
Galleries: http://canopuscomputing.com.au/gallery2/v/main-page/

C120644_small.jpg


Bird Control Officers on active service.
 
Last edited:
What sort of story do you wish to convey to your audience?
You see Bob, that's kind of the problem. I'm not too sure. I'm really just interested in whichever one is more interesting. In one, you have a lone man under a bridge, seen in a (possibly) contemplative moment, while in the other, you have a lone man under a bridge......looking at a lone and possibly unsupervised little girl. To some people, the latter could have sinister implications.

So, without regard for what I want, which looks more interesting to you?
 
What sort of story do you wish to convey to your audience?
You see Bob, that's kind of the problem. I'm not too sure. I'm really just interested in whichever one is more interesting. In one, you have a lone man under a bridge, seen in a (possibly) contemplative moment, while in the other, you have a lone man under a bridge......looking at a lone and possibly unsupervised little girl. To some people, the latter could have sinister implications.

So, without regard for what I want, which looks more interesting to you?
I understand. I often see a good B&W in a good color image, and process for both. Which is better? Depends on the audience I'm playing to, or my own mood of the moment. So in answer to your question, I see two different statements here, and I am not sure myself which I prefer. Neither really grabs me, but I can appreciate them for what they are, and put my own story to each one. But I think that's more out of respect for you as a peer, and your query - otherwise I don't think I'd linger over these much at all.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top