Reading mode: Light Dark

EM5 MK2 High ISO Banding P20 and PL25

Go to last post
Paul Auclair said:
one comment/reply was that the fella always uses e-shutter EXCEPT for with flash.

i'm no expert but.... i think that fella is not right?

a typical flash fires at real high speed (except to FP-TTL where it fires in bursts) so there would be no frequency related issues like the OPs with the artificial light sources previously discussed on this thread.
Click to expand...
The best way to think of an electronic shutter is a virtual slit that travels from top to bottom. The slit starts when the camera clears a row in the sensor and ends when it reads the data. The virtual slit always takes a fixes amount of time to move across the sensor being limited by how fast it can read the data. With my GX-7 this takes about 1/15 of a second, it looks like the new EM-5 II is quicker at about 1/25. To achieve faster shutter speed than 1/25 you have a slit that covers less than the full frame.

So unless you can live with a very slow flash sync speed of 1/25 or longer you cannot use a flash with the electronic shutter or you would get a bright band in an otherwise dark frame. Since the GX7 would require 1/15 or longer the flash is disabled when the electronic shutter is enabled so you do not have a choice. A flash sync that slow would be unusable most of the time so disabling the flash was probably a good choice. Even if the EM-5 II allows flash with the electronic shutter you will not want to use that combination except under special circumstances.
 
Chas2 said:
...
Chas2 said:
Chas2 said:
My understanding is that this banding occurs using e-shutter with CFL or halogens, but not basic incandescents. Because the lights are cycling at 60hz, the time between two zeros of the wave is 1/120s. That means you need shutter speeds slower than that to capture at least one full cycle.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
...
Chas2 said:
For CFLs, whose cycle is even more pronounced than halogens, shooting at slower than 1/120s should be general practice whether using e-shutter or mechanical shutter.
Click to expand...
Strongly disagree with halogens. Halogen lighting is the same as incandescent lighting, no effect. Halogen is a type of incandescent bulb.

Depending on the control mode, LED can have this banding effect, as well a fluorescent lighting and some neon lighting...at least at the last bar I was at using an e-shutter.
Click to expand...
Maybe the same banding happens with normal incandescents as well, I don't have any around to test. But to demonstrate the banding with halogens, here are two shots I just took of the halogen lamp in my office. Only other light source is the window behind me.


Mechanical Shutter


Electronic Shutter
 

Attachments

  • 3149913.jpg
    3149913.jpg
    384.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 3149914.jpg
    3149914.jpg
    386 KB · Views: 0
texinwien said:
I will be interested to learn whether the E-M5 II sensor is also prone to the special banding issues that have been shown to occur (inconsistently) in combination with the Panasonic 20mm.
Click to expand...
I tested my (bandy!) 20mm on a EM5II up to ISO6400. I could not see any banding. Hence one of the reasons I suspect its the EM1 sensor and not the EM5 sensor.

However this was JPG only, and its possible the NR was taking any banding out. The files did seem, er ... rather clean!
 
Big Ga said:
I tested my (bandy!) 20mm on a EM5II up to ISO6400. I could not see any banding. Hence one of the reasons I suspect its the EM1 sensor and not the EM5 sensor.
Click to expand...
An updated Sony sensor could be updated in numerous ways, including fixing this issue. Or not actually a fix, but a technology change for other reasons that simply isn't susceptible in the same way.

I definitely wouldn't use this as a reason for arguing that the new M5 uses an M1 (Panasonic) sensor.

"Setsuya Kataoka says that E-M5 Mark II has a new sensor compared to the E-M5. The new sensor will enable a silent electronic shutter."
 
Last edited:
Ok a little off topic but have you tried to use an off camera flash with the electronic shutter yet? If so where you capable of forcing the camera to exceed the flash sync speed? If you could try it out I would love to know.
 
I was trying to figure this out this morning - showing a coworker the Flash units I picked up,m and couldn't enable flash on the EM5-mkii at all. FInally switched from e-shutter to anti-shock and then flash was re-enabled. Unless I have some other setting that conflicts, it appears the E-M5 Mark ii does not allow flash when e-shutter is used.
 
rclatter said:
I was trying to figure this out this morning - showing a coworker the Flash units I picked up,m and couldn't enable flash on the EM5-mkii at all. FInally switched from e-shutter to anti-shock and then flash was re-enabled. Unless I have some other setting that conflicts, it appears the E-M5 Mark ii does not allow flash when e-shutter is used.
Click to expand...
thats weird. A few reviews pointed out that olympus said a 1/20 sync with e shutter. Maybe they removed it from the production model.
 
There could be something else I was missing, or a setting I would need to have set.

I was trying to use a manual flash (no ttl) not the bundled one.

When I get time I'll investigate further.

The way the Oly menus are there is quite possibly some other setting I have set which caused it to be grayed out. The quick fix was to switch from silent mode to anti-shock mode.
 
texinwien said:
Ulfric M Douglas said:
texinwien said:
As Big Ga already indicated, what you've shared here is not the kind of banding that is specific to the combination of the Panasonic 20mm and the Sony sensor used in the E-M5, E-M10, E-P5, E-PL5, E-PL6 and GH3 (I think that's a complete and correct list of m43 cameras that use that specific Sony sensor).
Click to expand...
Nowhere near complete, but correct as far as you got.
Click to expand...
I see that I forgot the E-PM2. Not sure about the E-PL7.

Any others I missed?
Click to expand...
I think that's it for right now. I have an e-pL7 and believe it to be the Sony sensor but haven't checked with a tapemeasure yet.
 
TN Args said:
Big Ga said:
I tested my (bandy!) 20mm on a EM5II up to ISO6400. I could not see any banding. Hence one of the reasons I suspect its the EM1 sensor and not the EM5 sensor.
Click to expand...
An updated Sony sensor could be updated in numerous ways, including fixing this issue. Or not actually a fix, but a technology change for other reasons that simply isn't susceptible in the same way.
Click to expand...
Possibly. But they've pumped out model after model with Sony sensors in the past and all of them band.
TN Args said:
I definitely wouldn't use this as a reason for arguing that the new M5 uses an M1 (Panasonic) sensor.
Click to expand...
Who's arguing? you maybe.
TN Args said:
"Setsuya Kataoka says that E-M5 Mark II has a new sensor compared to the E-M5. The new sensor will enable a silent electronic shutter."
Click to expand...
Well I definitely wouldn't use this as a reason for arguing anything. The original EM5 sensor was capable of silent electronic shuttering. Olympus just chose not to fully implement it at the time!
 
Big Ga said:
TN Args said:
Big Ga said:
I tested my (bandy!) 20mm on a EM5II up to ISO6400. I could not see any banding. Hence one of the reasons I suspect its the EM1 sensor and not the EM5 sensor.
Click to expand...
An updated Sony sensor could be updated in numerous ways, including fixing this issue. Or not actually a fix, but a technology change for other reasons that simply isn't susceptible in the same way.
Click to expand...
Possibly. But they've pumped out model after model with Sony sensors in the past and all of them band.
Big Ga said:
I definitely wouldn't use this as a reason for arguing that the new M5 uses an M1 (Panasonic) sensor.
Click to expand...
Who's arguing? you maybe.
Big Ga said:
"Setsuya Kataoka says that E-M5 Mark II has a new sensor compared to the E-M5. The new sensor will enable a silent electronic shutter."
Click to expand...
Well I definitely wouldn't use this as a reason for arguing anything. The original EM5 sensor was capable of silent electronic shuttering. Olympus just chose not to fully implement it at the time!
Click to expand...
Take it up with Satsuma if you think he's wrong!

P.S. don't over-react to my using the word 'arguing'. You seem to have a negative bias around the word that I don't attach to it. I used it in the dictionary sense of 'arguing one's case'. It means nothing more than putting one side of a logical discussion, and is a perfectly respectable activity. I mean nothing negative.

--
Arg
 
Last edited:
rclatter said:
I was trying to figure this out this morning - showing a coworker the Flash units I picked up,m and couldn't enable flash on the EM5-mkii at all. FInally switched from e-shutter to anti-shock and then flash was re-enabled. Unless I have some other setting that conflicts, it appears the E-M5 Mark ii does not allow flash when e-shutter is used.
Click to expand...
If it is like my GX7, there are two modes of e-shutter engagement. One is called Silent Mode -- it should really be called Stealth Mode because it disables everything that makes it easy to tell a shot is being fired off: mechanical shutter, flash, AF assist light.... The other is called Electronic Shutter and does nothing more than turn off the mechanical shutter. Maybe the Oly is the same?
 
TN Args said:
rclatter said:
I was trying to figure this out this morning - showing a coworker the Flash units I picked up,m and couldn't enable flash on the EM5-mkii at all. FInally switched from e-shutter to anti-shock and then flash was re-enabled. Unless I have some other setting that conflicts, it appears the E-M5 Mark ii does not allow flash when e-shutter is used.
Click to expand...
If it is like my GX7, there are two modes of e-shutter engagement. One is called Silent Mode -- it should really be called Stealth Mode because it disables everything that makes it easy to tell a shot is being fired off: mechanical shutter, flash, AF assist light.... The other is called Electronic Shutter and does nothing more than turn off the mechanical shutter. Maybe the Oly is the same?
Click to expand...
Engaging e-shutter mode on the GX7 does NOT do 'nothing more than turn off the mechanical shutter', because it also disables any flash triggering.
 
Mingjai said:
Chas2 said:
...
Mingjai said:
Mingjai said:
My understanding is that this banding occurs using e-shutter with CFL or halogens, but not basic incandescents. Because the lights are cycling at 60hz, the time between two zeros of the wave is 1/120s. That means you need shutter speeds slower than that to capture at least one full cycle.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
...
Mingjai said:
For CFLs, whose cycle is even more pronounced than halogens, shooting at slower than 1/120s should be general practice whether using e-shutter or mechanical shutter.
Click to expand...
Strongly disagree with halogens. Halogen lighting is the same as incandescent lighting, no effect. Halogen is a type of incandescent bulb.

Depending on the control mode, LED can have this banding effect, as well a fluorescent lighting and some neon lighting...at least at the last bar I was at using an e-shutter.
Click to expand...
Maybe the same banding happens with normal incandescents as well, I don't have any around to test. But to demonstrate the banding with halogens, here are two shots I just took of the halogen lamp in my office. Only other light source is the window behind me.


Mechanical Shutter


Electronic Shutter
Click to expand...
Highly interesting! Never seen it with incandescent lighting before! I will have to experiment.

Is the light above on any kind of dimmer? What is the AC source? 120v 60Hz?

It just so happens I have both old style magnetic and newer electronic dimmers for halogens, and incandescents. Might as well try it on my LEDs also!
 
Big Ga said:
TN Args said:
rclatter said:
I was trying to figure this out this morning - showing a coworker the Flash units I picked up,m and couldn't enable flash on the EM5-mkii at all. FInally switched from e-shutter to anti-shock and then flash was re-enabled. Unless I have some other setting that conflicts, it appears the E-M5 Mark ii does not allow flash when e-shutter is used.
Click to expand...
If it is like my GX7, there are two modes of e-shutter engagement. One is called Silent Mode -- it should really be called Stealth Mode because it disables everything that makes it easy to tell a shot is being fired off: mechanical shutter, flash, AF assist light.... The other is called Electronic Shutter and does nothing more than turn off the mechanical shutter. Maybe the Oly is the same?
Click to expand...
Engaging e-shutter mode on the GX7 does NOT do 'nothing more than turn off the mechanical shutter', because it also disables any flash triggering.
Click to expand...
My mistake. But point being it's worth checking if the Oly has more than one e-shutter mode and what they do.
--
Arg
 
Chas2 said:
Mingjai said:
Chas2 said:
...
Chas2 said:
Chas2 said:
My understanding is that this banding occurs using e-shutter with CFL or halogens, but not basic incandescents. Because the lights are cycling at 60hz, the time between two zeros of the wave is 1/120s. That means you need shutter speeds slower than that to capture at least one full cycle.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
...
Chas2 said:
For CFLs, whose cycle is even more pronounced than halogens, shooting at slower than 1/120s should be general practice whether using e-shutter or mechanical shutter.
Click to expand...
Strongly disagree with halogens. Halogen lighting is the same as incandescent lighting, no effect. Halogen is a type of incandescent bulb.

Depending on the control mode, LED can have this banding effect, as well a fluorescent lighting and some neon lighting...at least at the last bar I was at using an e-shutter.
Click to expand...
Maybe the same banding happens with normal incandescents as well, I don't have any around to test. But to demonstrate the banding with halogens, here are two shots I just took of the halogen lamp in my office. Only other light source is the window behind me.


Mechanical Shutter


Electronic Shutter
Click to expand...
Highly interesting! Never seen it with incandescent lighting before! I will have to experiment.

Is the light above on any kind of dimmer? What is the AC source? 120v 60Hz?

It just so happens I have both old style magnetic and newer electronic dimmers for halogens, and incandescents. Might as well try it on my LEDs also!
Click to expand...
Standard US AC source, 120V@60hz. No dimmer of any sort. I get the same effect with all my halogens at home, whether they are in standard A bulbs or in PAR38 floods.

I believe the explanation is in the dpreview thread I referenced a few posts up.
 
For everyone wondering about FLASH and shutters. A mechanical shutter needs to be fully open to be able to fire a flash, this is called the flash sync speed and we all understand this. An electronic first curtain is compatible with flash as it is also fully open and then the flash can fire, this is like the 0s AS on Oly. A full electronic shutter is at this point of technical development never fully open, it reads in horizontal bands one after the other so the very short flash will only illuminate one band and is unusable.

The solution is a global electronic shutter which reads the full sensor in one time (they are trying but not there yet). The GM1/5 shutters have a slower sync speed not because of the electronic first curtain, but because of the slower mechanical shutter (which is not using a spring as other shutters but a stepping motor).
 
Big Ga said:
I have a feeling the EM5II has the GH4/EM1 sensor base, not the same one as in the EM5 as has been bandied about here.
Click to expand...
What gives you that feeling?
 
secretworld said:
For everyone wondering about FLASH and shutters. A mechanical shutter needs to be fully open to be able to fire a flash, this is called the flash sync speed and we all understand this. An electronic first curtain is compatible with flash as it is also fully open and then the flash can fire, this is like the 0s AS on Oly. A full electronic shutter is at this point of technical development never fully open, it reads in horizontal bands one after the other so the very short flash will only illuminate one band and is unusable.
Click to expand...
Hi Vincent,

An electronic shutter of the kind we currently have can be "fully open" (open across the entire frame simultaneously) too. It's just that the exposure time must be longer than the time it takes to scan the entire sensor. Currently, this means 1/25 s or slower depending on exactly which camera we are talking about.

secretworld said:
The solution is a global electronic shutter which reads the full sensor in one time (they are trying but not there yet). The GM1/5 shutters have a slower sync speed not because of the electronic first curtain, but because of the slower mechanical shutter (which is not using a spring as other shutters but a stepping motor).

--
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/6757037874/albums/desktop
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

lokatz
Noise reduction: Is it worth it? How much improvement?
2 3
Replies
44
Views
45
Breakfastographer
B
Greg7579
ISO Invariance - Continued - Did the Demo 5 Times in Various Light
3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
84
Greg7579
Greg7579
B
Confirmation question on AUTO-ISO + Flash EM1.2
Replies
13
Views
14
ptys
P
J
Why I am keeping my RF...
Replies
14
Views
15
emdundronald
E
S
I bought a G9! Shooting a music video with it and EM5.III - advice needed
Replies
3
Views
4
kalisti
kalisti

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top