Nikon Users - what annoys you about your cameras?

It depends on the model first and secondly the Customer Service you receive if you have a problem with any product. I had a Nikon D600 with the oil spot/dust issue. I contacted Nikon shortly thereafter when the camera was recently introduced. Nikon refused to admit they had a problem and still to this day after who knows how many Class Action Lawsuits. I contacted them again after the flood gates opened and more people were complaining of the oils spots/dust. I asked if they were now going to recall the product and they said no. They stated "They were dealing with it on a case by case basis."

I believe that the lawyers in the Class Action Lawsuits threw their clients under the bus by settling for "Free Sensor cleanings for life." Then Nikon would make you send in your camera to Nikon for repairs. After the repairs, many people still experienced the oil spots. Then you got to send your camera in again and maybe they would make further repairs or replace it with a D610 after China ordered Nikon to stop selling the D600. I didn't get the D610 as I was fortunate to be able to return my camera to Costco (They are the best). People who got the early 610 releases were complaining of the oil spot/dust issue.

My point is that Nikon did not care whatsoever that people spent a large amount of money, mine was $3600.00, to run a business. Having people return their camera to Nikon for a "minimum of 14 days", without a loaner program. So as a customer for over 35 years of Nikon products, you are out $3600.00, have a camera with a design default that was not fixable and then requiring you to send it only to Nikon. Local authorized re-sellers were not allowed to repair or even clean the sensor. You had no camera to run your business and you get back a camera that the oil spots come back. So you get to start over.

Nikon was aware of the problem but refused to do anything about it at their customers expense. If they just would have recalled the camera in the beginning when they were fully aware of the problem, I for one would not be so upset. They refused to wait and see how many would complain. Even when it seemed everyone who purchased this camera had the problem, they still refused to admit they had a problem. Even with all the Class Action Lawsuits, they refused to admit they had a problem and the lawyers involved accepted a settlement allowing Nikon still not to have to admit they had a problem and the consumers were still not taken care of correctly. They got the "Repair or Replacement Program."

I will not buy another Nikon nor would I ever recommend anyone to buy any Nikon product. Their Customer Service is deplorable and their Quality Control is non existent. Then they are aware of a problem and are too arrogant to admit it and don't make a global resolution but "Handle it on a case by case basis" leaving customers with out a dependable camera and forcing them to send it to Nikon only and be without their investment numerous times before replacing it with a good camera. This in my opinion is preposterous and I sincerly hopre that people will stop buying anything that Nikon makes. Otherwise, those that do buy Nikon products will get this same type of "resolution" when there is a problem.
You do know Canon never fixed or admitted to the focus problems of their top of the line camera a few years back. No company is going to eat millions unless a class action forces them. Same applies to the auto industry
 
I am trying to root out everything that might bother me before I take the plunge and get rid of my Canon. Thanks!
Overall, Nikon still seem to have the "Nikon knows best" attitude that only they are qualified to make decisions regarding optimization of images, often leaving the users feeling like "back-seat drivers" with limited influence.

They still haven't given users the option of turning off the camera's processing of RAW data (hot-pixel suppression and various types of scaling).

AF system options are also quite limited, as are Nikon's explanations of AF algorithm details. For example, users should have more control over priorities used by the camera to resolve 3D ambiguities.

--

Qualities possessed by God in infinite proportion: Love, Grace, Power, Righteousness, Wisdom, . . .
Qualities possessed by humans in infinite proportion: Ignorance.
- Marianne
 
Welcome to the brave new world of : "Let's just ship it" - same with Sony and the "buzzing issue" on the quite expensive compared to size RX100 M2. Lots of people have the issue, repeatedly, but as far as I know Sony treats this on a case by case basis. They did repair my camera within a week. Nice. Lauadble. Even nicer not to have the issue in the first place. My Sony R1 had a well-known centering issue but the thing worked best stopped down anyway so I mainly shot @ F8 - F11. Apart from that the r1 was a brilliant design - aparently never to be repeated or improved upon.

I like Nikon for improving their designs systematically. They have the best landscape camera bodies and a fantastic 70-200mm F4 (not weathersealed though), great TC1.7x, affordable old lenses and 3rd party lenses and "all" - whether FF or DX can fit on FF and DX bodies and the "1" with an adapter. Samyang and newer zeiss lenses work with electronic diaphragm and integrates into AF (green light) and the matrix metering system. Sigma has great alternatives in their "A" series.

I hate Nikon's menu system. I gave up making a hdr image last week-end on vacation - I had set a memory bank to "B-HDR" - and it worked when I did that - a year ago. Now I selected "B-HDR" and I could not make it work - I had to google the solution @ home. Trolls will appear from everywhere telling me I am plain stupid - but I represent a segment of buyers ( the stupid ones ) that Nikon could cater to by making their menu system user friendly and introduce a "save" function the same way "save" works on any computer or phone.

An example: to execute the HDR you will have to enter the same number of images in 2 different places : find either the interval timer or self timer function plus in the HDR function on the top lcd panel. DUH?? This is contrary to good interface design regardless of how much we love our Nikon gear :-)

Update :

I just found this video:

If the self timer is set to just 2 images the D800 will shoot all the 3, 5, 7, 9 images in a bracketed HDR series! weird but useful.

--

Smile and the world smiles back!
 
Last edited:
What annoys me is.......... I bought a Nikon camera, joined DPReview and now someone is asking me what annoys me about my Nikon.
 
With the D800/D810/Df my only complaint, and its a big one, is the lack of interchangable focus screens.

On the cheap/light bodies like the D3x00 and D5x00, the lack of a lock for the multi-selector makes the cameras almost unusable handheld. I am constantly inadvertantly changing the focus point with the abductor muscle between the thumb and wrist on the shutter release hand. A major ergonomic fail.

One complaint over the entire digital camera line is the quality/usability of their software.
 
my d5100's shutter mechanism failed at only 10.955 shots .

don't think about d5100 :)
 
Thanks this is all great and so minor really compared to my Canon gripes:

1. Impossible to see black AF point in dark conditions.
Nikon AF points are red in dark condition.
2. Auto ISO minimum shutter speed is 1/250 (not good for me as I shoot action on aut0 ISO and want it to 1/2000)
Not sure about other models but the D750 allows 1/2000
3. Spot metering applies to centre point only

There are however things I love. Can I do something similar on the Nikon to this?

1. I have my DoF button, which is nest to lens mount on right hand side of camera, set to a hold to change between AFS and AFC. So for example I am shooting the dog with AFS then as soon as it starts moving I just hold the DoF button and I am on AFC mode. Then I release and I am back into AFS, which is my preferred default position. Really handy.
I'd try back button focus.

You stay in AFC mode and you just take your thumb off of the AF-ON button to get single functionality.

If you want to change from AFC to AFS for real though you can press the button in the Middle of the AF controller (bottom of camera, left of mount) and rotate the command dial to move betwen AFC AFS and AFA.

Press the same button and use the sub command dial and it iterates through the various number so sensor points e.g. auto, single, d9 d21, d51, 3d, Gp.

These settings are displayed in the viewfinder so you can make these changes while shooting.
The switch around the button, changes from manual to AF mode.
2. Exposure comp - I just use rear wheel. Can I do this on Nikon? I know it doesn't have a wheel, but can it be done so front dial does aperture, rear dial does exposure comp?
The rear dial is called the command dial and the front one the sub command dial.

The roles of the command dial and sub command dial and be reversed in the custom settings (pencil) menu.

God know why it is a pencil. Nikon designers may know too. I have no clue.
3. Easily changing ISO by pressing centre button of rear wheel and using front dial. Does that button in the middle of the Nikon joystick allow this?
You press the ISO button and turn the command dial.
 
Thanks this is all great and so minor really compared to my Canon gripes:

1. Impossible to see black AF point in dark conditions.
Nikon AF points are red in dark condition.
2. Auto ISO minimum shutter speed is 1/250 (not good for me as I shoot action on aut0 ISO and want it to 1/2000)
Not sure about other models but the D750 allows 1/2000
3. Spot metering applies to centre point only

There are however things I love. Can I do something similar on the Nikon to this?

1. I have my DoF button, which is nest to lens mount on right hand side of camera, set to a hold to change between AFS and AFC. So for example I am shooting the dog with AFS then as soon as it starts moving I just hold the DoF button and I am on AFC mode. Then I release and I am back into AFS, which is my preferred default position. Really handy.
I'd try back button focus.

You stay in AFC mode and you just take your thumb off of the AF-ON button to get single functionality.

If you want to change from AFC to AFS for real though you can press the button in the Middle of the AF controller (bottom of camera, left of mount) and rotate the command dial to move betwen AFC AFS and AFA.

Press the same button and use the sub command dial and it iterates through the various number so sensor points e.g. auto, single, d9 d21, d51, 3d, Gp.
These settings are displayed in the viewfinder so you can make these changes while shooting.
The switch around the button, changes from manual to AF mode.
2. Exposure comp - I just use rear wheel. Can I do this on Nikon? I know it doesn't have a wheel, but can it be done so front dial does aperture, rear dial does exposure comp?
The rear dial is called the command dial and the front one the sub command dial.

The roles of the command dial and sub command dial and be reversed in the custom settings (pencil) menu.

God know why it is a pencil. Nikon designers may know too. I have no clue.
3. Easily changing ISO by pressing centre button of rear wheel and using front dial. Does that button in the middle of the Nikon joystick allow this?
You press the ISO button and turn the command dial.
Landscape photography:

I usually use Aperture priority mode with auto shutter speed. The wheel on the back adjusts iso, the wheel on the front adjusts F no. and the plus/minus button on top plus wheel adjusts exposure compensation. I have assigned AF to the rear button and removed "AF on half press" - half-press now only activates vibration reduction. I am very happy with this setup - it is simple and fast to use. I have a brief preview that does not delay shooting sequences - I quicly glance at the histogram to check if I am in the right ballpark exposure-wise.

My main grief when I sit and pixel peep during post is that I THINK that I can handhold my 35mm zeiss at slower shutter speeds than I can really manage. I am a bit spoiled by the Sony R1 I guess - no mirror, no shutter, just a near silent click of the diaphragm opening and closing. 100% electronic shutter. It destroys hand-held panoramas.

This would be the way to go with live-view: open shutter - scan chip for 1 exposure - close shutter.

Nah - possibly dangerous: - somebody may point it at the sun and fry the chip.

Oh - so if a the threshold for a point-source of light is exceeded: close shutter automatically :-)
 
Landscape photography:

I usually use Aperture priority mode with auto shutter speed. The wheel on the back adjusts iso, the wheel on the front adjusts F no. and the plus/minus button on top plus wheel adjusts exposure compensation. I have assigned AF to the rear button and removed "AF on half press" - half-press now only activates vibration reduction. I am very happy with this setup - it is simple and fast to use. I have a brief preview that does not delay shooting sequences - I quicly glance at the histogram to check if I am in the right ballpark exposure-wise.

My main grief when I sit and pixel peep during post is that I THINK that I can handhold my 35mm zeiss at slower shutter speeds than I can really manage. I am a bit spoiled by the Sony R1 I guess - no mirror, no shutter, just a near silent click of the diaphragm opening and closing. 100% electronic shutter. It destroys hand-held panoramas.
I agree about the R1 being a very good landscape camera; the shutter is superb. By combining HDR sequences and 2D panning [on a tripod w/ pano head], outstanding landscapes are possible. I do not understand your last sentence?
This would be the way to go with live-view: open shutter - scan chip for 1 exposure - close shutter.

Nah - possibly dangerous: - somebody may point it at the sun and fry the chip.
With my R1 I have often included the sun in my exposures w/o damage:

3054851




The lens has fantastic control of flare!
 
I am trying to root out everything that might bother me before I take the plunge and get rid of my Canon. Thanks!
There are certainly things that one might put on a wish list of features for future cameras. But seriously, nothing "annoys" me about Nikon cameras.

That's probably because I have ONLY ever used Nikon DSLR bodies. I didn't get used to some other brand and then switch to Nikon only to be annoyed by some missing feature that I was used to in the other brand.

I have never used my D100, D200, D3, D4, D800, or D810 and been annoyed about the way something worked.
 
Peeling grip rubber and totally unintuitive placement of ISO control (although with the latest bodies, you can assign it to the movie record button, giving you single-handed access).

That's it for me. I'm happier with my D800 than I've been with any cameras since the 5D. I'd consider the D810 for its better AF, but I shoot people and couldn't live with the moire/moire risk. D750 may very well be my next camera body purchase.

I am trying to root out everything that might bother me before I take the plunge and get rid of my Canon. Thanks!
 
I am trying to root out everything that might bother me before I take the plunge and get rid of my Canon. Thanks!
Nikon raw buffer size
 
The biggest annoyance with mine is between the eye piece and the ground!
 
Because of this, one day I might re-join Fuji. Lurking and tested already several times, also XT-1, but Fuji is not yet there where I want them to be to switch...

Probably (I hope) the Nikon FX mirrorless will be there before Fuji catches up about AF, lens choice and more...
 
I have a D700 and a D800. People automatically assume I'm some sort of pro and ask me to take a photo of them with their point and shoot. I never get asked when I'm using my m4/3 gear.
 
Using liveview at night needs some improvement .
 
I am trying to root out everything that might bother me before I take the plunge and get rid of my Canon. Thanks!
I wish they were lighter so I don't want to throw them every time I hike uphill. Looking at the detailed images always makes me laugh about that though :)
 
Whenever you change a setting on a D800 the settings bank you chose is changed; this is awful and it annoys me constantly. And they're split up in two, shooting and custom settings, for no good reason.

Some of the newer cameras have the U1/U2 positions on the dial. This is better, but I would have preferred one button and then scroll through the possible banks with the wheel - and then you could have 10 or 20 banks, why not.

And Nikon, now that we're at it, why not make it possible to copy one bank to another, and add a check box to exclude a bank from the scrolling list so that during shooting you can limit yourself to 2 or 3 banks that are relevant for the shooting you do right then.

And tapping the button twice quickly will move you to the next bank, and you will see the name of the bank in the viewfinder so that you can keep your eye on the viewfinder.

But no, this little firmware trick is too much for Nikon. Or is it?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top