Thanks for mentioning IMAX, helps to prove you don't need more than 10 megapixels no matter how large your display.And then there's the IMAX and other "immersive" experience. I remember seeing North of Superior in 1971 at the Cinesphere at Ontario Place in Toronto (the first permanent IMAX installation). It was awesome! One fellow sitting next to me almost got sick watching the bush-plane-flying-through-the-river-canyon scenes.Sitting in front of a TV without moving, if you're focused on part of it you're focused on all of it. And you are always free to move your eyes and/or head if you want to concentrate on a different part of the screen.
LF Examiner (The Independent Journal of the Large Format Motion Picture Industry) suggests that seating for immersive, should give the viewer a field of view between 60 degrees (minimum) and 120 degrees horizontally, and 40-80 degrees vertically.
Sticking to the 60 degrees horizontal and our 85" diagonal TV (about 74" horizontal), I'd need to sit really close -- about 65 inches away! At that viewing distance, good eyes can theoretically resolve about 105ppi. My 85" diagonal TV could have as much as 40mp!
IMAX digital cameras record 4K video (less than 10 megapixels), but, have a large format 65mm sensor. That way they can use a smaller aperture (without diffraction), for a larger depth of field and you are there experience.
Imax pushes 3D cinema with 38-pound 4K digital camera
As has always been the case, if you truly need more resolution you need to go to a larger sensor. APS-C maximum resolution tops out at about 20 megapixels for all practical purposes. Higher pixel densities just decrease contrast in exchange for megapixels.
